informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...
Breaking News Browse by Category Analysis Highlights Multimedia Latest Comments Archives RSS Feed Syndication About Contact
Multimedia
An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand EverythingThe Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes OffOperation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jul 08 2009, 6:51 PM
Category: Brave New World
Source: 60 Minutes
Print
Related: Vaccination Myths and Truths (and why you do NOT have to take the shot)
CBS " 60 MINUTES" documentary on the swine flu epidemics of 1976 in the U.S. It went on air only once and was never shown again. Please look at this, it talks by itself. Related: Are you ready to roll up your sleeve? Below is the full transcript of the 1979 broadcast from the CBS investigative news program 60 Minutes on government propaganda around the 1976 swine flu scare. The program was aired on Sunday, November 4, 1979. Only one person was killed by the actual flu, while hundreds filed claims of death of their loved ones from the massive vaccine campaign which was mounted. The Swine Flu Epidemic of 1976 inspired the vaccination of 40 Million people a little known fact was that those vaccinations caused devastating side effects to over 4000 victims. The frightening revelations about this event are the similarities with today. Watch this video, download it, shows it to your friends and family. WE paid for these vaccines through our tax dollars. We must hold them accountable. CBS '60 Minutes' Transcript MIKE WALLACE: The flu season is upon us. Which type will we worry about this year, and what kind of shots will we be told to take? Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the U.S. government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation, and Washington decided that every man, woman and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nation-wide outbreak, a pandemic. Well 46 million of us obediently took the shot, and now 4,000 Americans are claiming damages from Uncle Sam amounting to three and a half billion dollars because of what happened when they took that shot. By far the greatest number of the claims - two thirds of them are for neurological damage, or even death, allegedly triggered by the flu shot. We pick up the story back in 1976, when the threat posed by the swine flu virus seemed very real indeed. PRESIDENT GERALD FORD; This virus was the cause of a pandemic in 1918 and 1919 that resulted in over half a million deaths in the United States, as well as 20 million deaths around the world. WALLACE: Thus the U.S. government's publicity machine was cranked into action to urge all America to protect itself against the swine flu menace. (Excerpt from TV commercial urging everyone to get a swine flu shot.) One of those who did roll up her sleeve was Judy Roberts. She was perfectly healthy, an active woman, when, in November of 1976, she took her shot. Two weeks later, she says, she began to feel a numbness starting up her legs. JUDY ROBERTS: And I joked about it at that time. I said I'll be numb to the knees by Friday if this keeps up. By the following week, I was totally paralyzed. WALLACE: So completely paralyzed, in fact, that they had to operate on her to enable her to breathe. And for six months, Judy Roberts was a quadriplegic. The diagnosis: A neurological disorder called "Guillain-Barre Syndrome" - GBS for short. These neurological diseases are little understood. They affect people in different ways. As you can see in these home movies taken by a friend, Judy Roberts' paralysis confined her mostly to a wheelchair for over a year. But this disease can even kill. Indeed, there are 300 claims now pending from the families of GBS victims who died, allegedly as a result of the swine flu shot. In other GBS victims, the crippling effects diminish and all but disappear. But for Judy Roberts, progress back to good health has been painful and partial. Now, I notice that your smile, Judy, is a little bit constricted. ROBERTS: Yes, it is. WALLACE: Is it different from what it used to be? ROBERTS: Very different, I have a – a greatly decreased mobility in my lips. And I can't drink through a straw on the right-band side. I can't blow out birthday candles. I don't whistle any more, for which my husband is grateful. WALLACE: It may be a little difficult for you to answer this question, but have you recovered as much as you are going to recover? ROBERTS: Yes. This - this is it. WALLACE: So you will now have a legacy of braces on your legs for the rest of your life? ROBERTS: Yes. The weakness in my hands will stay and the leg braces will stay. WALLACE: So Judy Roberts and her husband have filed a claim against the U.S. government. They're asking $12 million, though they don't expect to get nearly that much. Judy, why did you take the flu shot? ROBERTS: I'd never taken any other flu shots, but I felt like this was going to be a major epidemic, and the only way to prevent a major epidemic of a - a really deadly variety of flu was for every body to be immunized. WALLACE: Where did this so called "deadly variety of flu", where did it first hit back in 1976? It began right here at Fort Dix in New Jersey in January of that year, when a number of recruits began to complain of respiratory ailments, something like the common cold. An Army doctor here sent samples of their throat cultures to the New Jersey Public Health Lab to find our just what kind of bug was going around here. One of those samples was from a Private David Lewis, who had left his sick bed to go on a forced march. Private Lewis had collapsed on that march, and his sergeant had revived him by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. But the sergeant showed no signs of illness. A few days later, Private Lewis died. ROBERTS: If this disease is so potentially fatal that it's going to kill a young, healthy man, a middle-aged schoolteacher doesn't have a prayer. WALLACE: The New Jersey lab identified most of those solders' throat cultures as the normal kind of flu virus going around that year, but they could not make out what kind of virus was in the culture from the dead soldier, and from four others who were sick. So they sent those cultures to the Federal Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia, for further study. A few days later they got the verdict: swine flu. But that much-publicized outbreak of swine flu at Fort Dix involved only Private Lewis, who died, and those four other soldiers, who recovered completely without the swine flu shot. ROBERTS: If I had known at that time that the boy had been in a sick bed, got up, went out on a forced march and then collapsed and died, I would never have taken the shot. DR DAVID SENCER: The rationale for our recommendation was not on the basis of the death of a - a single individual, but it was on the basis that when we do see a change in the characteristics of the influenza virus, it is a massive public-health problem in the country. WALLACE: Dr David Sencer, then head of the CDS - the Center of Disease Control in Atlanta - is now in private industry. He devised the swine flu program and he pushed it. WALLACE: You began to give flu shots to the American people in October of '76? DR SENCER: October 1st. WALLACE: By that time, how many cases of swine flu around the world had been reported? DR SENCER: There had been several reported, but none confirmed. There had been cases in Australia that were reported by the press, by the news media. There were cases in - WALLACE: None confirmed? Did you ever uncover any other outbreaks of swine flu anywhere in the world? DR SENCER: No WALLACE: Now, nearly everyone was to receive a shot in a public health facility where a doctor might not be present, therefore it was up to the CDC to come up with some kind of official consent form giving the public all the information it needed about the swine flu shot. This form stated that the swine flu vaccine had been tested. What it didn't say was that after those tests were completed, the scientists developed another vaccine and that it was the one given to most of the 46 million who took the shot. That vaccine was called "X-53a". Was X-53a ever field tested? DR SENCER: I-I can't say. I would have to - WALLACE: It wasn't DR SENCER: I don't know WALLACE: Well, I would think that you're in charge of the program DR SENCER: 1 would have to check the records. I haven't looked at this in some time. WALLACE: The information form the consent form was also supposed to warn people about any risk of serious complications following the shot. But did it? ROBERTS: No, I had never heard of any reactions other than a sore arm, fever, this sort of thing. WALLACE: Judy Roberts' husband, Gene, also took the shot. GENE ROBERTS: Yes, I looked at that document, I signed it. Nothing on there said I was going to have a heart attack, or I can get Guillain Barre, which I'd never heard of. WALLACE: What if people from the government, from the Center for Disease Control, what if they had indeed, known about it, what would be your feeling? JUDY ROBERTS: They should have told us. WALLACE: Did anyone ever come to you and say, "You know something, fellows, there's the possibility of neurological damage if you get into a mass immunization program?" DR SENCER: No WALLACE: No one ever did? DR SENCER: No WALLACE: Do you know Michael Hattwick? DR SENCER: Yes, uh-hmm. WALLACE: Dr Michael Hattwick directed the surveillance team for the swine flu program at the CDC. His job was to find out what possible complications could arise from taking the shot and to report his findings to those in charge. Did you know ahead of time, Dr Hattwick that there had been case reports of neurological disorders, neurological illness, apparently associated with the injection of influenza vaccine? DR MICHAEL HATTWICK: Absolutely WALLACE: You did? DR HATIWICK: Yes WALLACE: How did you know that? DR Hattwick: By review of the literature. WALLACE: So you told your superiors - the men in charge of the swine flu immunization program - about the possibility of neurological disorders? DR RATTWICK: Absolutely WALLACE: What would you say if I told you that your superiors say that you never told them about the possibility of neurological complications? DR HAJTWICK: That's nonsense. I can't believe that they would say that they did not know that there were neurological illnesses associated with influenza vaccination. That simply is not true. We did know that. DR SENCER: I have said that Dr Hattwick had never told me of his feelings on this subject. WALLACE: Then he's lying? DR SENCER: I guess you would have to make that assumption. WALLACE: Then why does this report from your own agency, dated July 1976, list neurological complications as a possibility? DR SENCER: I think the consensus of the scientific community was that the evidence relating neurologic disorders to influenza immunization was such that they did not feel that this association was a real one. WALLACE: You didn't feel it was necessary to tell the American people that information DR SENCER: I think that over the - the years we have tried to inform the American people as - as fully as possible. WALLACE: As part of informing Americans about the swine flu threat, Dr Sencer's CDC also helped create the advertising to get the public to take the shot. Let me read to your from one of your own agency's memos planning the campaign to urge Americans to take the shot. "The swine flu vaccine has been taken by many important persons," he wrote. "Example: President Ford, Henry Kissinger, Elton John, Muhammad Ah, Mary Tyler Moore, Rudolf Nureyev, Walter Cronkite, Ralph Nader, Edward Kennedy" -etcetera, etcetera, True? DR SENCER: I'm not familiar with that particular piece of paper, but I do know that, at least of that group, President Ford did take the vaccination. WALLACE: Did you talk to these people beforehand to find out if they planned to take the shot? DR SENCER: I did not, no. WALLACE: Did anybody? DR SENC ER: I do not know. WALLACE: Did you get permission to use their names in your campaign? DR SENCER: I do not know. WALLACE: Mary, did you take a swine flu shot? MARY TYLER MOORE: No, I did not. WALLACE: Did you give them permission to use your name saying that you had or were going to? MOORE: Absolutely not. Never did. WALLACE: Did you ask your own doctor about taking the swine flu shot? MOORE: Yes, and at the time he thought it might be a good idea. But I resisted it, because I was leery of having the symptoms that sometimes go with that kind of inoculation. WALLACE: So you didn't? MOORE: No, I didn't. WALLACE: Have you spoken to your doctor since? MOORE: Yes. WALLACE: And? MOORE: He's delighted that I didn't take that shot. WALLACE: You're in charge. Somebody's in charge. DR SENCER: There are - WALLACE: This is your advertising strategy that I have a copy of here. DR SENCER: Who's it signed by? WALLACE: This one is unsigned. But you--you'll acknowledge that it was your baby so to speak? DR SENCER: It could have been from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. It could be from CDC. I don't know. I'll be happy to take responsibility for it. WALLACE: It's been three years now since you fell ill by GBS right? ROBERTS: Right. WALLACE: Has the federal government, in your estimation, played fair with you about your claim? ROBERTS: No, I don't think so. It seems to be dragging on and on and on, and really no end in sight that I can see at this point. JOSEPH CALIFANO: With respect to the cases of Guillain Barre... WALLACE: Former Secretary of HEW Joseph Caifano, too was disturbed that there was no end in sight. So a year and a half ago, he proposed that Uncle Sam would cut the bureaucratic red tape for victims suffering from GBS and would pay up quickly. CALIFANO: We shouldn't hold them to an impossible or too difficult standard of proving that they were hurt. Even if we pay a few people a few thousand dollars that might not have deserved it, I think justice requires that we promptly pay those people who do deserve it. WALLACE: Who's making the decision to be so hard-nosed about settling? CALIFANO: Well, I assume the Justice Department is. WALLACE: Griffin Bell, before he left? CALIFANO: Well, the Justice Department agreed to the statement I made. It was cleared word for word with the lawyers in the Justice Department by my HEW lawyers. CALIFANO: That-that statement said that we should pay Guillain Barre claims without regard to whether the federal government was negligent, if they - if they resulted from the swine flu shot. GENE ROBERTS: I think the government knows its wrong. JUDY ROBERTS: If it drags out long enough, that people will just give up, let it go. GENE ROBERTS: I—I am a little more adamant in my thoughts than my wife is, because I asked - told Judy to take the shot. She wasn't going to take it, and she never had had shots. And I'm mad with my government because they knew the fact, but they didn't realize those facts because they - if they had released them, the people wouldn't have taken it. And they can come out tomorrow and tell me there's going to be an epidemic, and they can drop off like flies to - next to me, I will not take another shot that my government tells me to take. WALLACE: Meantime, Judy Roberts and some 4,000 others like her are still waiting for their day in court.
SHARE:
Email This
Latest Brave New World - Forced Medicine: The Philosophy Behind Fluoridation - Former Marine claims military vaccines gave him brain damage - Our Masters See Us As Cattle -- Or Guinea Pigs - Veteran Class Certified in Drug 'Guinea Pig' Case - NJ Attempts to Strip Parental Rights with Vaccine Anti-Exemption Bill - UC Professor Eyes Permanent Sterilant To Cull US Population - Portland, Oregon to spend $5 million to poison its residents with toxic fluoride - Did Merck's Gardasil Vaccine Kill a 3 Year-Old Toddler?
Comments 1 - 8 of 8
Add Comment
Page 1 of 1
Anonymous
Posted: Jul 09 2009, 4:19 AM
Link
8558
Well there you have it. It's very clear that the government were well informed and deliberately kept it to themselves. We cannot trust that the new swine flu vac' is safe. it is being rushed through manufactoring, without (as far as I can research) being tested. If it is being tested, there wouldnt be enough time to see the long term affects as the flu shot is nearly upon us. They say that the existing flu shot will not be able to counteract this recent outbreak and have developed a new vaccine. How can they know if the new vaccine will be efficient? What history tells us is, that it would be stupid to trust what the (deathwish) governments say and suspect them for what they don't say. Joining the dots, I myself can only reach one conclusion, I will take my chance of catching the real flu and combatting it myself. If I die, well that would have been of my own choosing. What is very clear is that their main goal is population reduction, thats all they ever talk about, and this could or could not be the means. 50/50 KEEP YA SLEEVES ROLLED DOWN. Refuse the vaccine en-masse something doesn't look right here.
winterelixir
Posted: Jul 09 2009, 6:24 PM
The FDA and the CDC commit mass murders daily. The government knows this, it's done purposely. Most people don't understand this, they're brainwashed to think these things that are recommended to us are "good" for us. Puuulleasee.
Posted: Jul 12 2009, 10:15 AM
24125
Look up Eugenics Georgia guide stones Agenda 21 Check out what these people ACTUALLY support : Rockefeller, Kissinger, Ted Turner, Gates http://euro-med.dk/?p=9390 Then you will know and understand what really is going on.. WAKE UP SHEEPLE
Posted: Dec 08 2009, 7:37 PM
17369
This quote is very interesting... "Only one person was killed by the actual flu, while hundreds filed claims of death of their loved ones from the massive vaccine campaign which was mounted." Unlike the swine flu of 1976, thousands have now died from the 2009 swine flu, and zero have died from the vaccine.
Chris
Posted: Dec 08 2009, 7:42 PM
This is even more interesting: http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27733 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27973 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=28152 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27981 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27946 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27800 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27732
Joel
Posted: Dec 18 2009, 7:50 PM
2468
Love the FFVIImusic in the background. Epic!
Reader With Mind
Posted: Dec 04 2011, 4:04 PM
7064
Any vaccine can have side effects. broken pieces of virus proteins have been known to cause random autoimmune reactions for a long time. Many of which are neurological. But this vaccine has only 4000 in 40,000,000 an amazingly low incidence which just is seems more unlikely. The Whooping cough part of the standard DPT injection has a known reaction rate of 1 in 4000 which is 2.5 times higher and is given in every hospital when you come in for stitches and is REQUIRED to attend any US school. That is TENS of Thousands of seriously debilitated people who should rate more attention in the media than the few cases from swine flu vaccine. The fact that the governments are not cheering their extremely low reaction rate for swine flu makes you wonder just how successful they are in Suppressing doctors reporting of reactions.
Posted: Jun 16 2012, 8:03 PM
249
So 4000 people out of 46 million have complications that may be due to vaccination. That's 8.65x10^-4%, or .0865%. Pretty low incidence rate, and lest we forget post hoc fallacies of logic. Yawn
Name
Comment * No HTML
Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
Search
Advanced Search
Login
Username: Password: Remember Me
Forgot Password? Register
Bottom of Form
Most Popular
Jury Rejects Police Story and Awards Chicago Man $1 Million for Beating - 10/01Government 'Shut Down' Doesn't Prevent Opening of $2 Billion NSA Spy Center - 10/02The Standing Army Marches On - 10/01Foot cream kills HIV by tricking cells to commit suicide - 09/25Shoot First, Ask Questions Later: Cop Fired For Shooting At Man During Traffic Stop - 10/02Adam Kokesh's defense fund stolen while in jail, operation sabotaged - 10/01Two More Drug War Deaths - 10/01Luke Rudkowski Talks to Piers Morgan about Conspiracies - 10/01
Highlights
Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
Top