There is Endless information available on the Autopsy performed on President Kennedy.

What is Most bothersome is the fact that all reports from the ALL Medical personnel at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas does NOT support the the Final Autopsy Report from Bethesda Hospital in Washington D C. performed by Dr's. Humes, Boswell & Fincke.

Humes & Boswell were Hospital Administrators and never performed an autopsy in their medical careers.

Dr. Pierre Fincke was an Army Dr. who DID have autopsy experience but, was "Subservient" to Humes & Boswell.

Even the Secondary medical personnel at BOTH Hospitals gave information Contrary to Humes & Boswell's Final Reports.

Unfortunatly ALL medical personnel at Both Hospitals were Sworn to secrecy.

ALL Parkland medical personnel were threatened with losing their medical careers if they spoke out publicly.

Not one of them ever told what they observed that day until Dr. Charles Crenshaw reached Retirement & wrote a book called "Conspiracy of Silence".  (recommended reading)

http://www.lasthurrahbookshop.com/

ALL medical personnel at Bethesda Hospital were "Ordered" not to disclose Anything they observed on 11/22-23/63.

Once medical personnel at Bethesda testified in Open sessions at the HSCA, they were Finally Free to discuss everything they had observed during the autopsy.

ALL of that testimony can be obtained at the same web site. (click on CD/DVD's) 

http://www.lasthurrahbookshop.com/ 

Finally; The movie JFK by Oliver Stone caused such an Uproar with the American people that President Bush Sr. was Forced to give birth to the ARRB. (Assassination Records review Board)

The ARRB Hired Dr. Doug Horne to study/Evaluate all of the Autopsy material.

Dr. Doug Horne's report is posted below.

May 15, 2006 Press Conference:


Prepared Remarks by Douglas P. Horne,


Former Chief Analyst for Military Records, Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB)


I served on the staff of the Assassination Records Review Board for just over three years, from August 1995 through September 1998. During that period of time the Review Board granted permission for the staff to take the depositions of 10 persons involved in the autopsy on President Kennedy: as a result, today any American citizen can go to the "Archives II" facility in College Park, Maryland and obtain copies of the transcripts of the sworn testimony of the 3 autopsy pathologists; both of the official Navy photographers; both Navy x-ray technicians; a Navy photographer's mate who developed some of the post-mortem photography; and both of the FBI agents who witnessed the autopsy.


The Review Board's charter was simply to locate and declassify
assassination records, and to ensure they were placed in the new "JFK Records Collection" in the National Archives, where they would be freely available to the public. Although Congress did not want the ARRB to reinvestigate the assassination of President Kennedy, or to draw conclusions about the assassination, the staff did hope to make a contribution to future 'clarification' of the medical evidence in the assassination by conducting these neutral, non-adversarial, fact-finding depositions. All of our deposition transcripts, as well as our written reports of numerous interviews we conducted with medical witnesses, are now a part of that same collection of records open to the public. Because of the Review Board's strictly neutral role in this process, all of these
materials were placed in the JFK Collection without comment.


I have been studying these records for 10 years now. The reason I am here today is because contained within our deposition transcripts and interview reports is unequivocal evidence that there was a U.S. government cover-up of the medical evidence in the Kennedy assassination, yet most members of the public know nothing about this. Let me sound a cautionary note here:
no single statement of any witness stands alone. Before it can be properly evaluated, the recollections of each witness must be compared to all of his own previous testimony, and to that of other witnesses-before the Warren Commission, the House Select Committee on Assassinations, and even with independent researchers-as well as all available documentary evidence.


Having said this, after considerable study of all of these records, I am firmly convinced that there is serious fraud in the medical evidence of the Kennedy assassination in three areas:


(1) The autopsy report in evidence today, Warren Commission Exhibit # 387, is the third version prepared of that report; it is not the sole version, as was claimed for years by those who wrote it and signed it.


(2) The brain photographs in the National Archives that are purported to be photographs of President Kennedy's brain are not what they are represented to be; they are not pictures of his brain, but rather are photographs of someone else's brain. Normally, in cases of death due to injury to the brain, the brain is examined one or two weeks following the autopsy on the body, and photographs are taken of the pattern of damage.

Following President Kennedy's autopsy, there were two subsequent brain examinations, not one: the first examination was of the President's brain, and those photographs were never introduced into the official record; the second examination was of a fraudulent specimen, whose photographs were subsequently introduced into the official record. The pattern of damage
displayed in these 'official' brain photographs has nothing whatsoever to do with the assassination in Dallas, and in fact was undoubtedly used to shore up the official conclusion that President Kennedy was killed by a shot from above and behind.


(3) There is something seriously wrong with the autopsy photographs of the body of President Kennedy. It definitely is President Kennedy in the photographs, but the images showing the damage to the President's head do not show the pattern of damage observed by either the medical professionals at Parkland hospital in Dallas, or by numerous witnesses at the military autopsy at Bethesda Naval hospital. These disparities are real and are significant, but the reasons remain unclear. There are only
three possible explanations for this, and I will discuss these
possibilities today.


The Autopsy Report


The evidence that a draft autopsy report-as well as a first signed
version-existed prior to the report in evidence today is both easy to
understand, and undeniable.


The First Draft


On November 24, 1963 the chief pathologist at President Kennedy's autopsy, Dr. James J. Humes, signed a typed statement he had prepared that read as follows:


"I, James J. Humes, certify that I have destroyed by burning certain
preliminary draft notes relating to Naval Medical School Autopsy Report A63-272 and have officially transmitted all other papers related to this report to higher authority." [Author's emphasis]


On two occasions before the HSCA, in March of 1977 and in September of 1978, Dr. Humes maintained that he had destroyed notes. He repeated this claim in an interview published by the Journal of the American Medical Association in May of 1992. The reasons given in each case were that the notes were destroyed because they had on them the blood of the President, which Dr. Humes deemed unseemly.


The ARRB General Counsel, Jeremy Gunn, had reason to suspect that an early draft of the autopsy report had also been destroyed, based upon an analysis of inconsistencies between Dr. Humes' previous testimony about when he wrote the draft report, and existing records documenting its transmission to higher authority. After extremely thorough and persistent questioning by the Review Board's General Counsel in February of 1996, Dr. Humes admitted, under oath, that both notes from the autopsy, and a first
draft of the autopsy report (which had been prepared well after the
autopsy's conclusion and had no blood on it), had been destroyed in his fireplace.


The First Signed Version


A simple study of the receipt trail for the transmission of the autopsy report reveals that the first signed report is missing as well.


On April 26, 1965 the Secret Service transferred the autopsy photographs and x-rays, and certain vital documents and biological materials to the custody of the Kennedy family at the request of Robert F. Kennedy. That receipt lists, among other things:


"Complete autopsy protocol of President Kennedy (orig, & 7 cc's)-Original signed by Dr. Humes, pathologist."


Evelyn's Lincoln, secretary to the late President Kennedy, signed for
receipt of all of the items the same day.


Incredibly, on October 2, 1967 the head of the Secret Service signed a letter transferring the original of CE 387, the autopsy report placed in evidence by the Warren Commission, to the National Archives; the National Archives signed a receipt for CE 387 the next day, October 3, 1967.


Warren Commission Chief Counsel J. Lee Rankin, in a declassified
transcript of a January 27, 1964 Executive Session of the Commission, discusses details of the content of "the autopsy report" which are not consistent with the details of the report in evidence today, CE 387, thus confirming that the first signed version contained different conclusions.


The dilemma presented here can best be summarized by the following rhetorical question: How could the U.S. Secret Service transfer the original JFK autopsy protocol to the National Archives (or to anyone else, for that matter) on October 2, 1967 when they had previously given it to the Kennedy family on April 26, 1965? The answer, of course, is that there were two separate reports. The first smooth, or signed version, was given
to the Kennedy family at the specific request of Robert Kennedy, and has disappeared. The second signed version is in the National Archives today.


Conclusion


The destruction of both the first draft and the first signed version of the autopsy report are clear evidence of the ongoing malleability of the autopsy report's specific conclusions during the initial 2 weeks following the conclusion of the post mortem examination. Furthermore, it is clear that when Dr. Humes testified under oath to the Review Board that there was only one autopsy report, and that he only signed one autopsy report, he committed perjury.


[For those interested in obtaining copies of the relevant documents in the receipt trail, or in studying the likely content of the first two versions of the autopsy protocol, I will make copies of the relevant research memo available at the end of the press conference.]


Two Brain Examinations


My most remarkable finding while on the Review Board staff, and a totally unexpected one, was that instead of one supplemental brain examination being conducted following the conclusion of President Kennedy's autopsy, as was expected, two different examinations were conducted, about a week apart from each other. A thorough timeline analysis of available
documents, and of the testimony of autopsy witnesses taken by the ARRB, revealed that the remains of President Kennedy's badly damaged brain were examined on Monday morning, November 25, 1963 prior to the state funeral, and that shortly thereafter the brain was turned over to RADM Burkley, Military Physician to the President; a second brain examination, of a
fraudulent specimen, was conducted sometime between November 29th and December 2nd, 1963-and it is the photographs from this second examination that are in the National Archives today.


Pertinent Facts Regarding the Two Examinations are as follows:


First Brain Exam, Monday, November 25th, 1963


Attendees: Dr. Humes, Dr. Boswell, and Navy civilian photographer John Stringer.


Events: John Stringer testified to the ARRB that he used both Ektachrome E3 color positive transparency film, and B & W Portrait Pan negative film; both were 4 by 5 inch format films exposed using duplex film holders; he only shot superior views of the intact specimen-no inferior views; the pathologists sectioned the brain, as is normal for death by gunshot wound,
with transverse or "coronal" incisions-sometimes called "bread loaf" incisions-in order to trace the track of the bullet or bullets; and after each section of tissue was cut from the brain, Stringer photographed that section on a light box to show the damage.


Second Brain Exam, Between November 29th and December 2nd, 1963


Attendees: Dr. Humes, Dr. Boswell, Dr. Finck, and an unknown Navy photographer.


Events: Per the testimony of all 3 pathologists, the brain was not
sectioned, as should have been normal procedure for any gunshot wound to the head-that is, transverse or coronal sections were not made. The brain looked different than it did at the autopsy on November 22nd, and Dr. Finck wrote about this in a report to his military superior on February 1, 1965. The color slides of the brain specimen in the National Archives were exposed on "Ansco" film, not Ektachrome E3 film; and the B & W negatives are also on "Ansco" film, and originated in a film pack (or magazine), not
duplex holders. The brain photos in the Archives show both superior and inferior views, contrary to what John Stringer remembers shooting, and there are no photographs of sections among the Archives brain photographs, which is inconsistent with Stringer's sworn testimony about what he photographed.


Further indications that the brain photographs in the Archives are not President Kennedy's brain are as follows:


Two ARRB medical witnesses, former FBI agent Frank O'Neill and Gawler's funeral home mortician Tom Robinson, both recalled vividly that the major area of tissue missing from President Kennedy's brain was in the rear of the brain. The brain photos in the Archives do not show any tissue missing in the rear of the brain, only in the top.


When former FBI agent Frank O'Neill viewed the Archives brain photographs during his deposition, he said that the photos he was viewing could not be President Kennedy's brain because when he viewed the removed brain at the autopsy, the damage was so great that more than half of it was gone-missing. He described the brain photos in the Archives as depicting a 'virtually intact' brain.


Finally, the weight of the brain recorded in the supplemental autopsy report was 1500 grams, which exceeds the average weight of a normal, undamaged male brain. This is entirely inconsistent with a brain which was over half missing when observed at autopsy.


Conclusions


The conduct of a second brain examination on a fraudulent specimen, and the introduction of photographs of that specimen into the official record, was designed to do two things:


(1) eliminate evidence of a fatal shot from the front, which was evident on the brain removed at autopsy and examined on Monday, November 25th, 1963; and


(2) place into the record photographs of a brain with damage generally consistent with having been shot from above and behind.


Until I discovered that the photographs in the Archives could not be of President Kennedy's brain, the brain photos had been used by 3 separate investigative bodies-the Clark Panel, the Rockefeller Commission, and the House Select Committee on Assassinations-to support the Warren Commission's findings that President Kennedy was shot from above and behind, and to discount the expert observations from Parkland hospital in Dallas that President Kennedy had an exit wound in the back of his head.


In my opinion, the brain photographs in the National Archives, along with Dr. Mantik's Optical Densitometry analysis of the head x-rays, are two irrefutable examples of fraud in this case, and call into question the official conclusions of all prior investigations.


[For those who wish detailed verification of this hypothesis, the 32-page research paper on this subject that I completed in 1998 will be made
available at the end of this press conference.]


The Head Wound in the Autopsy Photographs


I would like to conclude with some brief closing remarks about the autopsy photographs at the National Archives.


The images of the President's head wound are inconsistent with both the Parkland hospital observations, and the Bethesda autopsy observations of almost every witness present in the morgue, as follows:


Parkland Hospital


The blowout, or exit wound in the right rear of the head seen in Dallas is not present in the autopsy images, which show the back of the head to be intact except for a very small puncture interpreted by the HSCA as a wound of entry. Furthermore, the autopsy photographs of the head show extensive damage to the top of the head, and to the right side of the head, which was not seen in Dallas during the 40 minutes that the President was observed in trauma room one at Parkland hospital.


Bethesda Naval Hospital


Most witnesses from the autopsy also recall a very large wound at the back of the head, which, as stated above, is not shown in the autopsy photographs. The additional damage many autopsy witnesses recall at the top of the head, and on the right side, is present in the photographs-but not the damage they remember at the rear. One prominent witness, Dr. Ebersole (the radiologist at the autopsy), testified under oath to the HSCA Forensic Pathology Panel in 1978 that the large head wound in the autopsy photos is more lateral and more superior than he remembered, and
said that he recalled the back of the head being missing at the autopsy.


Three Possible Explanations


There are 3 possible explanations for these inconsistencies:


(1) Photographic forgery-i.e., "special effects"-to make the rear of the head look intact when it was not;


(2) Major manipulation of loose, and previously reflected scalp from elsewhere on the head by the pathologists, so as to make it appear that the back of the head was intact when it was not; or


(3) Partial reconstruction of the head by the morticians, at the direction of the pathologists, followed by photography that created the false impression that there was no exit defect in the back of the head.


Many JFK researchers have long suspected photographic forgery, but extreme caution is warranted here because all analyses of the autopsy photographs done to date have used "bootleg" materials, and not the original materials in the Archives. The "bootleg" photographs do represent the actual views of the body in the Archives collection, but they are badly degraded, suffer from contrast buildup, and are photographic prints-whereas any true
scientific study of these images for authenticity should use the color positive transparencies and B & W negatives in the Archives as subjects, not multi-generational prints of uncertain provenance.


I personally examined magnified and enhanced images of the Archives autopsy photographs at the Kodak lab in Rochester, New York in November of 1997, and I saw no obvious evidence of photographic forgery; but I am the first person to admit that I am not an expert in photographic special effects techniques circa 1963.


I am of the opinion that it is likely that the back of the head appears intact in the autopsy photographs either because the loose scalp was manipulated for photographic purposes, or because the photos in question were taken after a partial reconstruction by the morticians. I was steered toward this opinion by the ARRB testimony of the two FBI agents who witnessed the autopsy. Both men found the images of the intact back-of-the-head troubling, and inconsistent with the posterior head wound they vividly remembered. Frank O'Neill opined under oath that the images
of the back-of-the-head appeared "doctored," by which he meant that the head had been put back together by the doctors. James Sibert testified that the head looked "reconstructed" in these images-he actually used the word "reconstructed" at his deposition.


No final conclusions can yet be drawn about exactly why a large defect in the rear of the head is not shown in the autopsy photographs, when one was seen by so many witnesses. It is sufficient to say that something is terribly wrong here, and that it is an area that requires more study with the original materials. Thank you for your attention.


I also have some interesting declassified FBI documents for anyone that is interested.



 Contact Information  tomnln@cox.net