SEE CURTAIN RODS FOUND IN THE TSBD BELOW FROM DALLAS POLICE WEBSITE ! ! !

Curtain rods

The City Of Dallas Archive has opened its doors allowing the research community and public as a
whole access to the JFK related documents from the Dallas Police and County Sheriff's
Department. They claim over eleven thousand documents are found in twenty plus boxes. Each box
contains folders of documents. I copied their master index in mid-April. Below is the first
four items from box number eight. Read closely the top item.

Start Quote

Box 8, Folder 1

1. CSS Form (Crime Scene Section), by an unknown author. Form requesting fingerprint check on
curtain rods. (The attached fingerprint cards were removed for conservation and preservation by
the archivist.) To view these cards see photograph albums, (Original), 03/15/64. 00002361 2
pages 08 01 001 2361-001.gif 2361-002.gif

Box 8, Folder 2

1. DMARC Form, by Cindy C. Smolovik. Form used to indicate items from this folder were
permanently relocated to box 12, (Original), 03/31/92. 00002365 1 page 08 02 001 2365-001.gif

2. Letter, by Melvin Diggs. Letter requesting the clothes of Lee Harvey Oswald be sent to the
National Archives Washington D. C., (Photocopy), 01/20/67. 00002366 2 pages 08 02 002
2366-001.gif 2366-002.gif

3. Fingerprint Record, by an unknown author. Photocopy of fingerprint and hand print cards for
Lee Harvey Oswald, (Photocopy), 11/23/63. 00002374 6 pages 08 02 003 1944 2374-001.gif
2374-002.gif 2374-003.gif 2374-004.gif 2374-005.gif 2374-006.gif

End Quote

Had these curtain rods come from the TSBD and had Oswald's finger prints been found on them, the
Government's case went out the window. This document, therefore, becomes a major find.

Note the numbers found at the end of this document. The 08 01 001 indicates this document was
found in Box 8, Folder 1, Item 1. Follow this numbering system to the next three documents.
The next document, the first found in Box 8, Folder 2 is numbered 08 02 001. Following this
number system, the next item is 08 02 002 and the following is 08 02 003.

But, looking for this 'curtain rod' document, 08 01 001, is now fruitless. A new and up-dated
index shows the first four item in Box 8 to be:

Start Quote

Box 8, Folder 1

1. DMARC Form, by Cindy C. Smolovik. Form used to indicate items from this folder were
permanently relocated to box 12, (Original), 03/31/92. 00002365 1 page 08 02 001
2365-001.gif

2. Letter, by Melvin Diggs. Letter requesting the clothes of Lee Harvey Oswald be sent to the
National Archives Washington D. C., (Photocopy), 01/20/67. 00002366 2 pages 08 02
002 2366-001.gif 2366-002.gif

3. Fingerprint Record, by an unknown author. Photocopy of fingerprint and hand print cards for
Lee Harvey Oswald, (Photocopy), 11/23/63. 00002374 6 pages 08 02 003 1944
2374-001.gif 2374-002.gif 2374-003.gif 2374-004.gif 2374-005.gif 2374-006.gif

4. Information Report, by an unknown author. Warren Commission documents from the FBI,
(Microfilm Copy), date unknown. 00002380 1 page 08 02 004 2380-001.gif

End Quote

Item number one is now the second document from this box. The curtain rod document, 08 01 001,
has vanished. Each item in Box 8 has been moved up one folder to compensate for the removal of
Folder 1.

But, in the governmental haste at damage control and half-assed attempt at destroying the
evidence, these clowns forgot to renumber the documents remaining in Box 8. Note how each
document is now mis-numbered.

The City of Dallas Archive promised to open its records for researchers. We asked for curtain
rods and was slipped the wienie. Thank you City of Dallas for being honest with us......you
proved the conspiratorial cover-up continues.

MP

LHO- CURTAIN RODS

jfk1963

jfkennedy1963

Skip to content

§                                 Home

§                                 About

§                                 Articles

§                                 Contact

← Frazier changes his story

Another person claims Curtain Rods!!!

Posted on December 13, 2013by Jfkennedy1963

I know I may be a little late to this discussion about someone else claiming curtain rods, but I feel the need to share it with everyone who is not familiar. As I was looking through some of the FBI files on the case I found another person that claims he was told by Oswald that he had curtain rods. My journey to this discovery came as I was looking through old telephone records of the home of Michael Paine. In the notes that the FBI had, was a memo that stated a man named Robert Yates voluntarily came into the office on November 26th, 1963. In his statement he claimed that he picked up a hitchhiker in the Oak Cliff section of Dallas on Beckley Street on either November 20th or 21st (Note that Oswald’s rooming house was located on Beckley Street). The man according to the witness had a package with him as he was standing on the side of the road. When Mr. Yates offered him a ride in his pickup truck, he told the man that he could put the package in the bed of the truck. The man stated that he wanted to hold on to him, because they were “curtain rods”.

The witness stated that once he saw the television coverage of the assassination he immediately recognized the man as Lee Harvey Oswald. How could Oswald be in two places at the same time? As the statements given by employees of the Texas School Book Depository mentioned, Oswald was at work on these two days leading up to the assassination. The witness said that he picked this Oswald up at around 10:30am and he was certain it was the Oswald on the television. The witness went on to further say that during the ride, that Oswald was asking him questions about “if someone could shoot the president”, “ever been to the carousel club”, “you think this rifle in this picture can kill him”. Even questions about the motorcade route of the president were talked about in this less then 15 minute drive into Dallas. The hitchhiker wanted to be dropped off at the intersection of Houston and Elm ( Texas School Book Depository) These kinds of questions raised some suspicion in the witness because when he arrived back to work that day, he mentioned his encounter with the hitchhiker to another co-worker. This witness was never brought before the Warren Commission and was completely left out of the final report. The FBI did not find that Mr. Robert Yates to be telling a lie, because they interviewed the other co-workers who claimed that he did mention to them about the hitchhiker story when he came back to work that day.

So how can there be two Oswald’s doing things at the same time on November 20th or 21st. My guess is that this witness Mr. Yates did not know Lee Harvey Oswald at the time, and that he did not want any fame from this. In the FBI memo, it states that the witness does not want publicity from it. The Warren Commission found this to go against the things they had already thought happened, and they did not want any part of it as well. We know from witness testimony at the Texas School Book Depository ( TSBD), that many of them take lunch at 12:00 but that they do not punch out for their break. Could Oswald have left the building unnoticed and caught a ride to his rooming house to retrieve a different gun to be used in the assassination? Then caught a ride back into the city before his lunch break would be over. Remember, it is only a 15 minute ride to the rooming house. We also know that someone has already brought a rifle into the building a few days before and that everyone was glancing over it. If Oswald was to bring a package in then, nobody would notice.

The real question should be, if he was able to get a gun into the building on either the 20th or 21st, why would he need to bring another package on the 22nd. The story that Buell Frazier mentions is the one that the Warren Commission is so readily wanting to accept instead of Mr. Yates’s story. Could it be that Frazier’s link to getting Oswald the job, and the every Monday car rides seemed so much better. Or are they trying to hide the fact that there was two rifles found that day, and the gun they wanted to find was right where they thought it would be and the other rifle used went missing. I’m not saying that Oswald pulled the trigger, but I do believe that there was involvement on his part, and to figure out what it was is another mystery to uncover. Two Dallas Police Officers make a mention about finding another rifle and not the one that had been shown to the world. They have made statements about finding this other gun but yet again, this gets overlooked. But that discussion will be for another day and time to examine.

Sources:

F.B.I, (1963). (DL 44-1639). Retrieved from website: http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/FBI Records Files/105-82555/105-82555 Section 023/105-23b.pdf

Share this:

§                     Twitter1

§                     Facebook10

§                     Google

§                     StumbleUpon

§                     More

§                      

§Email

§Reddit

§ 

§Tumblr

§ 

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Frazier changes his story
In "1963"

Questions Still Linger On...
In "1963"

Job Hunting..
In "1963"

This entry was posted in 1963, assassination, Conspiracy, HIstory, jfk, Kennedy Assassination, Oswald, Uncategorized and tagged Conspiracy, Dallas, jfk, john f kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald, oswald, Texas School Book Depository, Warren Commission. Bookmark the permalink.

← Frazier changes his story

7 Responses to Another person claims Curtain Rods!!!

1.                              conspiracycritic7 says:

December 13, 2013 at 11:06 am

I don’t believe Buell Frazier’s story at all, I believe he was an essential piece in setting up Oswald…. http://conspiracycritic7.wordpress.com/2013/11/25/nailing-buells-jewels-to-the-wall/

Reply

2.                              Jfkennedy1963 says:

December 13, 2013 at 4:15 pm

The story that he tells has never added up. In many of his interviews he stated that him and Oswald barely spoke in the car. But yet he somehow knows about different aspects of Oswald’s life including living in Russia. Guess that wasn’t important to Buell since we were in the middle of the Cold War at the time.

Reply

§                                                         conspiracycritic7 says:

December 13, 2013 at 5:02 pm

Jack Dougherty saw Oswald enter the building that morning carrying NOTHING….Frazier dropped him off at the door and he went and parked his car and walked alone to work. This is supported by other workers testimony to the HSCA….If anyone took a rifle into the building that morning it had to be Frazier…Oswald denied the curtain rod story…He didn’t mention taking curtain rods to Ruth Paine or Marina…He also was seen at a shooting range with Oswald prior to the shooting…Frazier was a short hair away from being charged as an accomplice and I think he gave them what they wanted.

Reply

§                                                                                 Jfkennedy1963 says:

December 13, 2013 at 5:07 pm

Exactly, people forget about the sightings at the rifle range and the fact that Frazier himself owned a rifle that was taken by Dallas Police. A confession was there for him to sign but he refused. Not sure if he refused or when Fritz handed him the confession, that federal agents told Fritz to take that off the table because they just wanted Oswald. Frazier seems to be to be influenced by others, and with his connections to Ruby he was able to get that gun planted on the sixth floor.

Reply

§                                                                                                         conspiracycritic7 says:

December 13, 2013 at 5:13 pm

Agreed! I also ran across some testimony stating that Frazier brought Oswald to work everyday…not just when he went to Irving…and have you noticed he is not available to researchers and only does interviews about every five years reciting the same old tired story? The museum interview revealed a little more, but the interviewer was lobbing softballs for Buell and not asking the right questions….

Reply

§                                                                                                                                 Jfkennedy1963 says:

December 13, 2013 at 5:18 pm

I actually viewed the interview on the computer when I was in the reading room at the sixth floor museum. As I was watching it, Gary Mack the curator was at the table next to me with another researcher. While I was watching the interview I could not help but notice all of the nervous habits Frazier had. The worst was he kept pulling at his ear every time the talk was about Oswald. I wanted to ask Mr. Mack some questions while I was in there but I was told I would have to set up an appointment with him. WTH. He was right there.

§                                                                                                                                 conspiracycritic7 says:

December 13, 2013 at 5:24 pm

Yeah…they certainly don’t make it easy! Since we don’t have the results of Frazier’s lie detector test, I would say he probably failed miserably as he did with the voice stress analysis in the 70′s…He’s definitely a liar…The question is how deep was his role? All he could’ve been told to do was befriend Oswald and get his gun into the building on a certain date. After they had gone shooting, all Wesley had to do was offer to keep Oswalds gun in his trunk for safekeeping….

THESE EXHIBITS COME FROM THE DALLAS POLICE WEBSITE>>>

http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/42/4202-001.gif


> http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/42/4202-002.gif


> http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/42/4202-003.gif


> http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/42/4202-004.gif