Here's an exchange between Yo(Momma)Harvey & myself>>>
> > > > Marina was indeed threatened with Deportaion>>>
>
> > Marina's testimony Volume I page 79.
> > Robert's testimony Volume I page 410.
>
>
> > > FALSE...but then again, this is Rossley. He just got out of his
> > > coffin.- Hide quoted text -
SAME disagreement with YEUHD;
"yeuhd" <walloon@mailbag.com>
wrote in message
news:a2c0155a-6b52-4385-be9f-a473e633ee79@n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 2, 4:40 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net>
wrote:
> "yeuhd" <wall...@mailbag.com>
wrote in message
>
> news:eb5ec867-b8d5-4f48-a530-8f7c805044af@v29g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 29, 11:21 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net>
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Marina was under Threat of Deportation.
>
> Marina was under no such threat of deportation whatsoever. An agent
> from the INS even came to her shortly after the assassination to
> assure her of that.
>
> yeuhd;
> Will you concede defeat if I post testimony from Marina And, Robert Oswald
> on threats of Deportation?
yeuhd wrote;
Too late. I've already proved you were wrong.
I write;
Are you THAT afraid of your own evidence/testimony?
I will scan page 79 from volume I with Marina's testimony.
I will scan page 410 from volume I with Robert Oswald's testimony.
I will place both pages on my website so others can see exactly what you
are.
ps;
How do you like how I made you look bad with the citations that the Mexico
City Oswald was only 5 ft. 3 inches tall?
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
Here are my Citations;
Volume I page 79.
Volume I page 410.
NOW, we can add JLeyden to this list of Liars>>>
"The SUBJECT" was>>>>
Marina was threatened with Deportation.
YOU changed the subject by inserting the WC Cover-up AFTER she testified on
deportation.
The WC had NO Power to Deport/Stop Deportation.
Please tell us How many Deportation Orders the WC "RECINDED"?
http://whokilledjfk.net/deport_marina.htm
<JLeyden900@aol.com> wrote in
message
news:347a82f3-23ec-4907-8bdc-1e3eb223857e@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 29, 11:40�pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net>
wrote:
> WHY don't you show us where the /Warren Commission recommended that those
> officials be Prosecuted for Forcing a wife to testify against her
> husband?
>
> WHY don't you show us where the /Warren Commission recommended those
> officials be Prosecuted for "Threatened" to Deport Marina?
WHY do you keep changing the subject, Tom. The issue here is simple
enough for you (and Ben) to understand. You run a dishonest website.
You promise evidence/testimony but you tailor that evidence/testimony
to meet your preconceptions -- about Marina facing deportation if she
doesn't liet o the WC, for example. Ah, doesn't make any difference
since no one pays any attention to you anyway -- well, except Ben
(when he's not in Jujdo class).
JGL
THAT WEBSITE IS PUTTING MY MONEY WHERE MY MOUTH IS
LEYDEN....WHERE'S YOURS YOU NICKEL/DIMER?
YOU BELONG IN A WOOD CHIPPER !
> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>
> BOTTOM POST;
>
> <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in
message
>
> news:32b4bc2f-7b74-4459-96b4-b548adc20383@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 29, 11:19 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net>
wrote:
>
> > JLeyden is Embarrassed by the evidence/testimony from the WC's 26
> > volumes
> > posted on my website.http://whokilledjfk.net/
>
> > Did JLeyden expect the Warren Commission ADMIT that the FBI committed
a
> > Felony by threatening Marina with deportion?
>
> > Ask JLeyden WHY they didn't abide by the law stating that a wife can
NOT
> > be �forced to testify against her husband?
>
> > Ask JLeyden why he CRIES when I RETALIATE to his personal insults
> > against
> > me? �ETC...ETC...ETC
>
> See this is why the JFK assassination discussion (it's not even a
> debate anymore) has dragged on for more than 44 years. �The issue
here
> is very simple but Tom won't confront it. �Tom deliberately excluded
> from his web site an important portion of Marina's WC testimony that
> contradicted his assertion that Marina only gave incriminating
> testimony against her husband because she was threatened with
> deportation. �In this section that Tom decide not to mention (Vo,l,
p.
> 80) for obvious reasons, WC Chief Counsel Lee Rankin assured her that
> she was not in danger of deportation even if she refused to testify
> before the WC. �She also said she had previously received similar
> assurances from an INS official. So much for Tom's bogus website. Go
> there only if you've got time to waste.
>
> JGL
>
> WHY don't you show us where the /Warren Commission recommended that those
> officials be Prosecuted
> for Forcing a wife to testify against her husband?
>
> WHY don't you show us where the /Warren Commission recommended those
> officials be Prosecuted
> for "Threatened" to Deport Marina?
>
>
>
> > BOTTOM POST;
>
> > <JLeyden...@aol.com>
wrote in message
>
>
>news:3306139a-bf9c-425a-be72-a92ab03fdd45@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> > Tom Rossley (a/k/a Tomnln) is know for urging NG posters to go to his
> > website and posting links to help them get there. But potential
> > visitors there should be aware that they don't always get the straight
> > poop, so to speak. In a prime example, I was caught up in an almost
> > endless discussion on ACJ with Tomnln and his buddies (great bunch and
> > serves me right for going there) to the effect that Marina Oswald
> > gave incriminating testimony against her husband only because she was
> > threatened with deportation. He refused to post a link (guess he
> > doesn't like me) but I found it in the Google archives. To support
> > his case, Tomnln displays p.79, WC Vol. 1 on his website in which
> > Marina testifies that FBI agents tried a little intimidation during
> > questioning when she was in protective custody by saying "If I
wanted
> > to live in this country, I would have to help in this matter."
>
> > But turn the page to p.80, which Tomnln failed to post for reasons
> > that will become evident, and you find an immediate reaction by WC
> > Chief Counsel Lee Rankin who told her: "You understand you do not
have
> > to tell the Commission in order to stay in the country, don't
you?"
YOU SHOULD POST PAGE 80 YOU CHEAP BASTARD !
> > After Marina answered "yes," Rankin added, "You are not
under any
> > compulsion to tell the Commission here in order to stay in the
> > country."
>
> > Marina then responded to a question about her appearance at the
> > hearing by saying, "This is my voluntary wish, and no one forced
me to
> > do this." She also said she had met with an INS official and was
> > assured her "I have every right to live in this country"
since she had
> > not been convicted of any crime.
>
> > So Tomnln has not been straight with us or himself and anyone using
> > his website are advised to use extreme caution.
>
> > JGL
> > JLeyden is Embarrassed by the evidence/testimony from the WC's 26
> > volumes
> > posted on my website.http://whokilledjfk.net/
>
> > Did JLeyden expect the Warren Commission ADMIT that the FBI committed
a
> > Felony by threatening Marina with deportion?
>
> > Ask JLeyden WHY they didn't abide by the law stating that a wife can
NOT
> > be
> > forced to testify against her husband?
>
> > Ask JLeyden why he CRIES when I RETALIATE to his personal insults
> > against
> > me?
>
> > Ask JLeyden if Marina STILL believes the Warren Commission's
> > "Conclusions"?
> > Marina made public statement that "I was Manipulated".
>
> > Ask JLeyden WHY the WC "Suspended" the Rules of Evidence?
>
> > Ask JLeyden WHY the WC Disallowed the "Adversary Procedure"?
>
> > Ask JLeyden WHY the WC Refused Marguerite Oswald's request for an
> > Attorney
> > to represent her son?
>
> > THAT's why JLeyden Runs from other Felonies committed by the
authorities
> > by
> > playing "Fast/Loose" with evidence/testimony>>>
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> > JLeyden Supports Felons.
YEUHD ALSO TOOK A BATH ON THIS ONE>>>
"yeuhd" <walloon@mailbag.com>
wrote in message
news:7169675b-2882-4e3b-ba0b-584a2287146e@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 31, 11:38 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net>
wrote:
> > Oswald carried a long, narrow package into the Depository Building on
> > the
> > morning of November 22, 1963. He claimed to co-worker WesFrazier, who
>
> Fraziersaid it was short.
>
YEUHD wrote;
Please quote from Wesley Frazier's affidavit or testimony where he
says the bag was "short".
I write;
"TWO FEET LONG"
It doesn't appear that you have done much study on this subject yeuhd.
-
Here's the quote you asked for>>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMFbOTmT2Gw
Contact Information tomnln@cox.net