In the aftermath of the world Trade Center bombing of
February 26, 1993, the FBI concocted misleading scientific reports and pressured
two leading scientists to perjure their testimony in order to support its
prosecution of the men accused of the bombing.
The process was described by senior FBI explosives expert Dr. Frederic
Whitehurst during his testimony at the trial on August 14, 1995.
Sewage pipes in the skyscraper broke during the explosion. depositing 80
gallons of sewage throughout the wreckage. The Treasury Department's Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) asked Dr. Whitehurst to analyze some of this
sewage, thinking it was an explosive substance. "Transcript. pg. 16333".
Dr. Whitehurst concluded that there was no sound scientific basis for the
government's public claim that a urea nitrate bomb had been the source of the
explosion. When he refused to recant or to doctor his reports to support the
urea nitrate bomb theory, the FBI used an unqualified
lab technician to testify that the so-called urea nitrate found at the scene
was consistent with a urea nitrate bomb.
Dr. Whitehurst submitted two blind test samples to the lab technician.
Whitehurst had prepared one sample by urinating into a laboratory flask. The
other was a sample of commercial grade fertilizer prepared by FBI Agent
Burmeister. The lab technician found that both samples tested positive for urea
nitrate, the explosive component of the infamous fertilizer bomb.
In other words, Dr. Whitehurst proved that the lab technician, like the ATF,
couldn't tell a bomb from sewage.
The following pages are taken from the transcript of the New York trial for
the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. The extracts begin at page 16315
in the original transcript, and continue consecutively through to page 16354.
Many people who distrust the mainstream media have turned to alternate
news sources, some of which are Internet based. Unfortunately, many of these
alternate sources of news simply promote an alternate series of lies. These
alternate lies are of course dressed up as "exposÚs." But you can easily tell
the phonies from the real thing. The information in the Waco Holocaust
Electronic Museum is an acid test.
Remember, since ancient times, inquiries into questionable deaths have
started with the bodies of the victims. If your news source won't give you an
honest and full account of the forensic information on Waco, or if it does not
have a link to the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum ... your alternate news has
failed a fundamental acid test.
Published by Public Action, Inc., a news and news analysis
service. All commercial rights are reserved. A full statement of terms and
conditions for copying and redistribution is available in the Museum Library.
"Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum," "SkyWriter," and the sky writing logo are
trademarks of Public Action, Inc. To receive occasional dispatches on Waco
issues, write to
Curator@Public-Action.com and put SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.