The Conspiracy to Assassinate President Kennedy was covered
up by Elements of Government and, National News Media.
This page is reserved to illustrate the News Media's
participation in that cover-up.
Start with the question of HOW can a private Business BUY
Evidence in the Crime of the
On Saturday morning Life Magazine Bought the Zapruder Film, paying $150,000 for
that Zapruder Film.
WHY would Life Magazine Refuse to produce that film to an
Authorized District Attorney (Jim Garrison) when that film is needed in a Trial
of accused conspirator Clay Shaw?
WHY would that film request Require a Subpoena?
WHY would that Subpoena be fought by Life Magazine all the
way to the United states Supreme Court?
HOW can that Private Business then REFUSE to show that Film
to the American Public?
HOW can that Private Business then LIE about the contents of
After owning the "Z" Film for 2 weeks, in the
December 6, issue on page 52F here's what Life said about the film we were Never
going to see.
Notice that the throat wound was STILL an Wound of Entrance.
Notice how Life Lied about how JFK had an Entrance in the
throat by Lying.
The united States Supreme court ruled in favor of Jim
Once Garrison got the film, bootleg copies showed up all over
the Research Community.
The First time the "Z" Film was ever shown on
National TV is in 1975 when Geraldo Rivera hosted a TV Show called
Rivera had 2 guests named Bob Groden and, Dick
Gregory. Once they Showed the "Z" film on National
TV the "cat was outta the bag" so to speak. That's when Life
Magazine sold the film back to the Zapruder family for $1.00 after paying
$150.000 for it.
Anothe Life Magazine employee is Richard Billings. Read what
Loran Eugene Hall said about Billings when questioned by the HSCA. (below)
HOW can the New York Times publish a Full Page Laudatory
Editorial Edifying the 26 Volumes only 1 day after they were released?
There isn't a Human on earth who read 10 million words in 1
day let alone evaluate/remember them.
HOW can Dan Rather get away with the Lies he told about the
Zapruder Film? (see Dan Rather Lies Page under Zapruder Film Page)
differential between Dallas and, Christchurch, New Zealand is seventeen (17)
How did New Zealand know Oswald had
lived in Russia before it was known in Dallas? ? ? ?
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
defenders of the Warren Report are ABSOLUTELY correct….
would take an enormous amount of people conspiring to effect a conspiracy of
thismagnitude. Surely, some of them
would leak the truth sooner or later."
there were an enormous amount of people engaged in the conspiracy. SomeACTIVELY. (Knowingly) Some PASSIVELY. (Unknowingly) Some were
"DUPED" intoparticipating in
Parkland Drs. in
. (Conspiracy of Silence)
Presidents Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush and Clinton (Conspiracy of Silence)
Drs. in D.C. Humes, Boswell & Finke. (Lying about JFK's wounds.)
Commission members. (Intentionally issuing a false Report.
ACTIVE:Some Warren Commission staff members. (Looking the other way duringthecommission of a felony.)
AND THE FBI. Witholding evidence, & information, Tampering withwitnesses and evidence.
ACTIVE:CIA.Tampering with evidence, Lying & Witholding evidence.
ACTIVE:LBJ, (With one stroke of a pen the evidence was locked away for 75
MAKES OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT SO GREAT IS THAT IT CONSISTS OF THREE (3)
SEPERATE BRANCHES; EXECUTIVE, JUDICIAL & LEGISLATIVE.
other words our Government has a CHECKS & BALANCES system built into it.
(Sort of an insurance policy against corruption)
sort of like when one of these branches screws up the other branches are there
to insure that the faux pas will see the light of day. (Something similar to the
way Watergate worked.)
believe that on the preceding pages I showed that ALL THREE Branches dropped the
ball on the Kennedy Assassination.
1. EXECUTIVE- LBJ for conspiring to hide the truth by locking away the
evidence for 75years with one stroke of
2. JUDICIAL- Chief Justice of the Supreme Court conspiring to issue a
FALSE report.Acting Attorney General
Nicholas Katzenbach ORDERING the end result before theinvestigation even started. FBI, State of
and Dallas Law Enforcementparticipating
in a FRAME-UP and a COVER-UP. Not to mention the collusion in themurder of one FBI informant (Oswald) by another FBI informant (Ruby).
LEGISLATIVE-Two Commission Members, Russell & Cooper coming from the Senateand Two Commission Members Boggs & Ford coming from the House of
Reps. Alongwith a Former Dir. of CIA
Dulles and a Former head of The World Bank McCloy.Collectively conspired to issue a FALSE Report.
BUT NOT TO WORRY! BECAUSE OF OUR "CONSTITUTION" THERE HAS
ALWAYS BEEN AN UNOFFICIAL FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT KNOWN AS THE PRESS.
In the unlikely event that the three branches of Government would
collectively enter into a conspiracy to commit a crime or even willingly become
an accessory after the fact by conspiring to COVER_UP a crime. We could always
rely on the unofficial fourth branch of government, THE PRESS! (In these times
"The Press" is defined as The Print Media and The Electronic Media.
i.e. Radio & Television.)
In addition to what I wrote above about TIME-LIFE Inc., I suggest you go
to the library for a copy of "The Montreal Star" 9/12/77 for an
article reprinted from the New York Times about the NEXT issue of ROLLING STONE
Magazine. It contains an article by reporter Carl Bernstein (of Watergate fame).
Bernstein tells of a working relationship between the CIA and some 400
journalists of the New York Times, CBS and a dozen other news organizations
can also check out remarks of former CBS reporter Sig Mickelson to the effect
that CBS reporters had the approval of CBS head William Paley in the 50's. The
approval to work with the CIA for the purpose of disseminating MIS-INFORMATION
to the American public. (Cronkite/Rather worked for CBS!)
MAGAZINE Issue of July 11, 1975 has a great article by Jerry Policoff entitled
"The Media and the Murder of John F. Kennedy".
to whett your appetite I'll give you a small quote. This is from a letter to J.
Lee Rankin, Chief Counsel to the Warren Commission. It's dated May 21, 1964.
Daniel, Ass't Managing Editor, N.Y. Times.
"...It happens to be to our interest, as well as to the interest of
the Commission and of the country, to obtain as wide a distribution of this
document as we can. ..."
YOU GETTING THE PICTURE HERE FOLKS? THE DATE OF: MAY 21, 1964 IS FOUR (4) MONTHS
BEFORE THE COMMISSION COMPLETED IT'S WORK AND RELEASED THE REPORT! (Lone
Assassin, NO Conspiracy!)
information on the collusion between the media and the Government can be found
's book; A CITIZEN'S DISSENT.
greater understanding of the way the media works in concert with the government
(CIA) is through the eyes of an "INSIDER" _Daniel Schoor, in his book
CLEARING THE AIR".
I understand that after more than a decade of recession the average Joe
doesn't know why we're having the crime problem that exists today. He isn't
aware of the changes this Country has gonethrough
since 1963 because he doesn't have the time to research it. He just knows
there's TOO much crime and want's it stopped.
Politicians, Law Enforcement leaders and the Professionals of this Country
(Medical & Lawyers) KNOW WELL that when the LEADERSHIP breaks Law and the
LEADERSHIP covers it up, they CAN"T very well expect the masses to follow
Law that those same LEADERS just proved no longer exists.
closing I want to thank authors such as Schiller, Ford, Belin, Posner, Roberts,
, Bishop, Curry, Epstein, Hartogs,
, Mayo and Sparrow.
until the time that they wrote their books to either support the Warren Report
or to ATTACK the critics I had read very little on the subject. (AP edition of
the critics wrote I couldn't verify because I didn't have the 26 Volumes either.
(When I did gain access to the 26 Volumes, my goal was to discover that the
critics were indeed SCAVENGERS. Needless to say I found the "credible
critics" To be VERY CREDIBLE!
became very apparent that the subject was of magnanimous importance with the
amount of books that were being written on the subject. What was REALLY
mind-Boggling was the amount of books written for the sole purpose of
discrediting the so called critics. I was never comfortable with the official
version of JFK's Assassination. But I didn't know why. In those days Americans
automatically accepted whatever our Government told us.
MY HOPE IS THAT THESE WRITINGS AROUSED YOUR CUROSITY ENOUGH TO RESEARCH
THE SUBJECT "THOROUGHLY" TO GET THE TRUE FACTS OF WHAT HAPPENED TO THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
MORE, SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/helsinki.htm
In August, 1993, thousands
of pages of CIA documents were made available to researchers at the National
Archives that had been previously classified, including several documents
associated with Priscilla Johnson McMillan, author of Marina and Lee, and
the subject of several earlier articles by this writer.(1)
The first document, dated
December 11, 1962 (and numbered 17456), is a "contact report,"
previously classified "secret," written by Donald Jameson, Chief
SR/CA, which possibly stands for "Soviet Russia/Covert Actions." The
report is based on a 90- minute meeting with Priscilla Johnson in her room at
the Brattle Inn, located in
. It was pointed out that, according to Mr. Butler at the "OO Office"
, Priscilla was "...allowed to use the
for her own work, mainly the writing of articles and a book, but that she has
no other official relationship to the center."
Jameson described Priscilla
as being "able, astute and conscientious," reflected also in her
writing, but at the same time, was "rather nervous and shy,"
suggesting a "lack of self-confidence." He noted, however, that she
certainly had a large number of Soviet contacts, and knew how to meet and talk
to people. Jameson indicated at the outset of his report that Priscilla had been
"selected as a likely candidate to write an article on Yevtushenko in a
magazine for our campaign." He recognized that Priscilla was
"concerned about making her articles accurate as to fact and free from any
external influence," but believed that "she might be worked around to
writing an article in which she genuinly (sic) believed, but would also further
our purposes for Yevtushenko" (a popular Russian poet).
Much of the report is a
summary of Jameson's discussion with Priscilla about various Russian poets and
Yevtushenko especially, whom the CIA seemed to be particularly interested in.
Priscilla informed Jameson that she had arranged to write several articles for The
Reporter - including one on Yevtushenko - and emphasized that "she
thought she must write only the truth, without defining exactly what that was to
In conclusion, Jameson
pointed out that, despite what she had stated:
think that Miss Johnson can be encouraged to write pretty much the articles we
want. It will require a little more contact and discussion, but I think she
could come around ... Basically, if approached with sympathy in the cause she
considers most vital, I believe she would be interested in helping us in many
ways. It would be important to avoid making her think that she was being used as
a propaganda tool and expected to write what she is told. I don't think she
would go along with that idea at all. On the other hand, she is searching for
both more information and more understanding of the problem of the Soviet
intellectual and is consequently subject to influence."
It is certainly clear that
the CIA intended to make full use of Priscilla Johnson's talents as a Soviet
researcher and writer in an ongoing attempt to destabilize conditions in the
, apparently without her complete knowledge.
The next document, dated
February 5, 1964, and numbered 17458 (suggesting that there might be a
document still classified in between), is a lengthy memo based on a meeting with
Priscilla on Jan. 30 and 31,1964, this time written by Gary Coit (SR/CA).
Although the report was prepared two months after the assassination of JFK,
there is no mention of the subject, including Priscilla's revised report of Nov.
24, 1963 about having interviewed Lee Harvey Oswald. However, in the initial
four line paragraph, two full lines and a partial line have been blacked out.
Intriguingly, there is a
reference to Priscilla having written to "...her former boss, President
Kennedy..." in regard to the fact that her notebooks had not been returned
to her by the Soviet Union; they had been removed from her luggage as she was
leaving Leningrad (Priscilla pointed out that none of the material was
"...particularly sensitive ... and would not have really seriously
compromised any of her contacts in the USSR.") Presumably, Coit's reference
to JFK as Priscilla's "boss" dates back to the mid-1950s when he was a
senator. Nevertheless, she was able to obtain the President's assistance, as
press secretary Pierre Salinger had made contact with the Soviet Ambassador
about her notebooks, "...which produced no result."
The overall purpose of the
Jan. 30-31 meetings (which lasted a total of 11 hours) was to "...debrief
Johnson on her flaps with the Soviets when she was in the
, notably at the time of her last exit." Much of the memo deals with some
of the problems Priscilla encountered with Soviet officials related to her visa
and attempts to have it extended. She was able to meet with a Soviet lawyer and,
later, his boss in the Foreign Office, and was asked to prepare "...a
complete curriculum vitae on herself" - which Priscilla refused to produce.
She was also asked about certain issues such as NATO and Soviet-American trade,
and "...whether or not she would be interested in writing articles for
An attempt was made during
the debriefing to learn about Priscilla's "contacts" while in the
, but she was unwilling to provide names (one of her contacts had been exiled
for a year); therefore "...no effort was made to attempt to force the issue
of a debriefing on her contacts." However, Coit indicated during the
interview that he would "...probably be back to see her from time to time
to see what she knows about specific persons whose names might come up, and she
at least nodded assent to this."
Reference was made to a
reporter/translator named Victor Louis associated with both McGraw-Hill and
NANA, whom Priscilla felt had a "...lousy reputation in
;" she attempted unsuccessfully to get NANA to "drop Louis." She
also encouraged NANA to hire "...Ruth Danilov, the wife of another
correspondent" (possibly Victor Danilov, author of Rural Russia: Under
the New Regime (Univ. of Indiana Press, 1988), but more likely Nicholas
Daniloff, a Newsweek correspondent who wrote Two Lives: One Russia
(Avon Publishing, 1990) - Coit might have misspelled Ruth's last name.) However,
the Soviets refused to accredit her. Priscilla pointed out that NANA
subsequently hired "Dick Steiger" who was immediately accredited, due
to his "left wing past." Brief reference was also made to Frieda Lurye,
a liberal Russian who had spoken at Harvard, as well as Yelena Romanova, whom
Priscilla "thoroughly dislikes and thinks ought to be discredited."
Priscilla raised the
question during the interview of the likelihood of being able to return to the
as a "correspondent." Coit felt it depended on whether the Soviets
believed she could be "...useful for some of their plans." Coit felt
that her chances were good, since she had not been in any "...serious
trouble or done anything especially bad." However, to the best of my
knowledge, Priscilla never again returned to the
Coit had brought up the name
"Alex Dolberg" during the debriefing, whom Priscilla knew and talked
to at length when he was "...at Harvard." The CIA were quite certain
that he was "...working for Sovs and therefore advised her to be careful in
any dealings with him." Priscilla had been equally suspicious, although her
discussions with him had "...developed her understanding of the Soviet
machine ... and (she) now understands power as used by the Sovs."
In his final paragraph, Coit
stated that he was "...vaguely uncomfortable after this long discussion
with Johnson...", even though he found her to be "...intelligent and
well informed on the Soviet Union" (although with "...an air of
naivety and innocence, which is really only a mannerism"). Coit felt that
Johnson's interest in the Soviet Union was "...an intellectual thing,"
and that she was "...not out to destroy the Communist system" (the
major goal of the CIA). Having spoken to another U.S. correspondent named
Patricia Blake (who later wrote a glowing review of Marina and Lee for Time
magazine), Coit had noted two "...apparent contradictions" related to
1) she had defended Dolberg
to Blake, who for years she had thought was "...no good;" and
2) according to Blake, Miss
Johnson had developed a "...low opinion of Lurye after the Boston press
conference," in contrast to comments made by Priscilla during the
In conclusion, Coit felt
that "...we cannot expect to use Johnson actively in operations. She
obviously doesn't want to get involved in deep plots. She is unlikely to be the
type of informant who will volunteer information; but she will supply info she
has acquired, if asked and if it's not too sensitive, such as the identies (sic)
of her friends in the USSR."
There is no indication
whether the CIA encouraged Priscilla to contact Marina Oswald through its
publishing connections, or whether she provided any feedback based on her
extensive interviews later that year, but such information could very well be
included in another, still classified document.
The third document that I
received, dated February 23, 1965, is also a memo written by Gary Coit, based on
a phone call from Priscilla in regard to Alex Dolberg. By now Dolberg was living
"...in London's demi-monde with homosexuals, drunks, beatniks, etc."
and had become "...terribly paranoid", convinced that he was being
"...followed everywhere." Priscilla had heard from several sources
that Dolberg might be considering going back to the USSR because of the death of
his mother and the condition of his father. Coit indicated that Priscilla had
reported this information because of her belief that Dolberg "...could do
more harm to followers of Soviet intellectual affairs, both in the West and in
the USSR, than anyone else she can think of." They both agreed that
"someone" should have a talk with Dolberg, and encourage him to
recognize the fact that returning to the USSR would be a mistake. At the same
time, Coit felt it was important to emphasize to Dolberg that no one trusted him
in the West, believing he was a "...Soviet agent," but if he told the
CIA everything he knew, he could be "...rehabilitated" and have his
Based on the fact that
Priscilla had made the call to the CIA, regardless of her motivation, it would
appear that she had become an informer for the Agency, although it is impossible
to know how much other information she provided, and whether any of it related
to her contact with Marina Oswald.
It should be noted that the
CIA's interest in Priscilla Johnson began at an early date, based on the fact
that a "201 file" was opened most likely in the mid-1950s(2)
and, according to a fourth document declassified in 1993 entitled, "Review
of 201 File on U.S. Citizen," Priscilla's file had not been closed as of
Jan. 28, 1975. She was listed as a "witting collaborator," although
the nature of her collaboration was not described.(3)
In addition to the four
documents described above, I also received a copy of Priscilla's HSCA Executive
Session interview that took place on April 20,1978, although 40 out of 113 pages
of transcript have been withdrawn by the CIA. It was clear that the committee
members did not entirely trust her.
Thanks to Jon Meyers at AARC for letting me know about the availability of PJM
documents discussed in this report.
According to a conversation with Major John Newman earlier this year, no date is
listed on "201 files", but PJM's number (102798) precedes both
Oswald's and Webster's considerably: He estimates that her file was likely
opened around 1955. No date is required on "201 files."
I learned from Anthony Summers that Priscilla Johnson claimed in a recent
interview (with Summers and his wife, Robbyn), that "...the Johnson in the
1975 document is someone other than herself." (Letter from Summers to
Whitmey, dated July 27, 1994). It should be noted that only the last name is
given on the CIA document, unlike the other three, but all four are stamped
"Approved for Release 1993 CIA Historical Review Program." I got the
distinct impression from my conversation with John Newman that the
"201" file number on the 1975 document was Priscilla Johnson's.
it appears that Richard Billings was
CIA also. according to testimony of Loran Hall to the HSCA.
York Times Admits That Virtually Every Major News Organization Allows The
News To Be Censored By Government Officials
Michael, on July 23rd, 2012
one of the most shocking articles that the New York Times has ever put out,
a New York Times reporter has openly admitted that virtually every major
mainstream news organization allows government bureaucrats and campaign
officials to censor their stories. For example, almost every major news
organization in the country has agreed to submit virtually all quotes from
anyone involved in the Obama campaign or the Romney campaign to gatekeepers
for “quote approval” before they will be published. If the gatekeeper in the
Obama campaign does not want a certain quote to get out, the American people
will not see it, and the same thing applies to the Romney campaign. The goal
is to keep the campaigns as “on message” as possible and to avoid gaffes at
all cost. But this kind of thing is not just happening with political
campaigns. According to the New York Times, “quote approval” has become
“commonplace throughout Washington”. In other words, if you see a quote in
the newspaper from someone in the federal government then it is safe to say
that a gatekeeper has almost certainly reviewed that quote and has approved
it. This is another sign that “the free and independent media” in this
country is a joke. What we get from the mainstream media is a very highly
filtered form of propaganda, and that is one reason why Americans are
turning away from the mainstream media in droves. People want the truth, and
more Americans than ever realize that they are not getting it from the
The following quote
comes from the recent article in the New York Times mentioned above and it is absolutely jaw
quotations come back redacted, stripped of colorful metaphors, colloquial
language and anything even mildly provocative.
are sent by e-mail from the Obama headquarters in Chicago to reporters who
have interviewed campaign officials under one major condition: the press
office has veto power over what statements can be quoted and attributed by
reporters, desperate to pick the brains of the president’s top strategists,
grudgingly agree. After the interviews, they review their notes, check their
tape recorders and send in the juiciest sound bites for review.
verdict from the campaign — an operation that prides itself on staying
consistently on script — is often no, Barack Obama does not approve this
This is an article
that everyone needs to read. If you have not read it yet, you can find it
all of this means is that both the Obama campaign and the Romney campaign
essentially have “veto power” over any quotes from those campaigns that we
see in the newspapers.
According to the New York Times, virtually every major news organization
has agreed to submit their quotes for “quote approval”….
was difficult to find a news outlet that had not agreed to quote approval,
albeit reluctantly. Organizations like Bloomberg, The Washington Post,
Vanity Fair, Reuters and The New York Times have all consented to interviews
under such terms.
absolutely disgusting, and it goes against everything that our media is
supposed to stand for.
can say about these people I once considered “colleagues” is that I am so
ashamed of them. I am mortified. They are humiliating themselves and a vital
institution for any free society.
seems the biggest threat to the American tradition of a free and independent
press is not government coercion. It’s the willing submission of the press
to being handled and managed by government and politicians.
mind that Joseph Farah has been working in the world of journalism for
decades. He is deeply saddened to see what is happening to a profession that
he deeply loves.
is not the only one.
Just check out what
Dan Rather had to say during a speech back in 2009….
my age and stage I’ve finally reached the point where I don’t have to kiss
up to anybody,” he said. “What a wonderful feeling it is.”
so, his talk emphasized what he believes is the erosion of quality
journalism, because of the corporatization, politicization, and
“trivialization” of news. Those three factors, Rather argued, have fueled
the “dumbing down and sleezing up of news” and the decline of “great
Likening media consolidation to that of the banking industry, Rather claimed
that “roughly 80 percent” of the media is controlled by no more than six,
and possibly as few as four, corporations.
Rather is right. The control over the media in the United States is more
tightly concentrated than ever before.
Back in the early
1980s, approximately 50 corporations essentially had nearly total control of the
media in the United States.
just six monolithic media corporations dominate virtually everything you
watch, hear and read.
six gigantic corporations own television networks, publishing houses, movie
studios, newspapers, radio stations, music labels and video game companies.
Most Americans are absolutely addicted to information and entertainment, and
those six massive corporations supply the vast majority of the information
and entertainment that Americans take in.
The amount of control
that those six corporate giants have is absolutely incredible. For example,
the average American watches 153 hours of television a month. If you can beam 153 hours of
“programming” into someone’s head each month, that gives you an awesome
amount of influence over that person.
monolithic corporations mentioned above are Time Warner, Walt Disney,
Viacom, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., CBS Corporation and NBC Universal.
are some areas of the media that are not completely dominated by those
corporations, but even control over those areas is becoming more highly
concentrated than ever.
For example, Clear Channel now owns over 1000 radio stations across the
United States. The power that Clear Channel has over the radio industry in
America is absolutely staggering.
control over the Internet is becoming much more concentrated. Giant
corporations such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are increasingly
controlling what we see and hear online.
really is the “big six” that dominate most of what we see, hear and read on
a daily basis.
In a previous article, I detailed a portion of the vast media
holdings of these gigantic corporations….
Today, six colossal
media giants tower over all the rest. Much of the information in the chart
below comes from mediaowners.com. The chart below reveals only a small fraction
of the media outlets that these six behemoths actually own….
Box Office (HBO)
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
CW Network (partial ownership)
New Line Cinema
Time Warner Cable
Buena Vista Home Entertainment
Buena Vista Theatrical Productions
Buena Vista Records
Walt Disney Pictures
Pixar Animation Studios
Buena Vista Games
Paramount Home Entertainment
Black Entertainment Television (BET)
Country Music Television (CMT)
Nick at Nite
The Movie Channel
Jones & Company, Inc.
Fox Television Stations
The New York Post
Fox Searchlight Pictures
Fox Business Network
Fox Kids Europe
Fox News Channel
Fox Sports Net
Fox Television Network
My Network TV
News Limited News
Phoenix InfoNews Channel
Phoenix Movies Channel
STAR TV India
STAR TV Taiwan
Times Higher Education Supplement Magazine
Times Literary Supplement Magazine
Times of London
20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
20th Century Fox International
20th Century Fox Studios
20th Century Fox Television
The Wall Street Journal
Fox Broadcasting Company
Fox Interactive Media
The National Geographic Channel
National Rugby League
Sky Radio Denmark
Sky Radio Germany
Sky Radio Netherlands
CBS Television Network
CBS Radio Inc. (130 stations)
CBS Consumer Products
CW Network (50% ownership)
Simon & Schuster (Pocket Books, Scribner)
Westwood One Radio Network
NBC Television Network
Syfy (Sci Fi Channel)
NBC Universal Television Distribution
NBC Universal Television Studio
Paxson Communications (partial ownership)
Universal Parks & Resorts
Universal Studio Home Video
keep in mind that the list above is not exhaustive. It only contains a
sampling of the companies that those six corporate giants own.
you starting to get an idea of how powerful they are?
ever wondered why the version of “the news” that you get is so similar no
matter where you turn, it is because control of the news is concentrated in
just a very few hands.
controls the “big six” media corporations?
it surprise you to know that the boards of directors of those big media
corporations have a tremendous amount of overlap with the boards of
directors of large banks, large oil companies and large pharmaceutical
corporations share members of the board of directors with a variety of other
large corporations, including banks, investment companies, oil companies,
health care and pharmaceutical companies and technology companies.
You can find a list
that shows how these boards of directors overlap and interlock right here.
The giant media corporations are not going to
criticize the establishment because they are
messages that these media behemoths pound into our heads are going to be the
messages that the establishment wants pounded into our heads.
that believes that the mainstream media is “independent” and that it does
not have “an agenda” is being delusional.
course it is also worth mentioning that much of what we get from the
mainstream media is also often directly controlled by the federal
that the federal government and the establishment are opposed to one
another. The truth is that they very much work together hand in hand. But
sometimes the federal government has slightly different priorities than the
corporate establishment does.
event, the key point to take away from all this is that the news and
entertainment that we all enjoy on a daily basis if very highly censored and
very highly controlled.
imperative that we understand that those that own and control the media are
trying to shape society in a certain way. They want to impose their values
and their vision of the future on all the rest of us.
Instead, they tell us to keep having faith in the system and they promise us
that everything is going to be okay.
you can mindlessly believe the corporate media if you want, but I believe
that in this day and age it is absolutely imperative that we all learn to
think for ourselves.
be a mindless robot for anyone.
for yourself and make your own decisions.
truth is out there and you can find it if you are willing to go search for
I dug this up at the NYT site. It
was their first article after the
assasination, assembled by Tom Wicker from many sources. The interesting
thing is that every statement concerning the time the limousine was on
Elm St. comports *exactly* with the lone gunman in the TSBD viewpoint.
There isn't a single mention of the grassy knoll by Wicker or witnesses.
The number, rhythm and direction of the shots are described with
complete confidence, and the description is in complete accordance with
the views of non-conspiracists.
November 23, 1963
Kennedy Is Killed By Sniper
As He Rides In Car In Dallas;
Johnson Sworn In On Plane
By TOM WICKER
Dallas, Nov. 22--President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was
shot and killed by an assassin today.
He died of a wound in the brain caused by a rifle bullet that was
fired at him as he was riding through downtown Dallas in a
Vice President Lyndon Baines Johnson, who was riding in the third
car behind Mr. Kennedy's, was sworn in as the 36th President of
the United States 99 minutes after Mr. Kennedy's death.
Mr. Johnson is 55 years old; Mr. Kennedy was 46.
Shortly after the assassination, Lee H. Oswald, who once defected
to the Soviet Union and who has been active in the Fair Play for
Cuba Committee, was arrested by the Dallas police. Tonight he
was accused of the killing.
Suspect Captured After Scuffle
Oswald, 24 years old, was also accused of slaying a policeman
who had approached him in the street. Oswald was subdued after
a scuffle with a second policeman in a nearby theater.
President Kennedy was shot at 12:30 P.M., Central standard time
(1:30 P.M., New York time). He was pronounced dead at 1 P.M.
and Mr. Johnson was sworn in at 2:39 P.M.
Mr. Johnson, who was uninjured in the shooting, took his oath in
the Presidential jet plane as it stood on the runway at Love Field.
The body of Mr. Kennedy was aboard. Immediately after the
oath-taking, the plane took off for Washington.
Standing beside the new President as Mr. Johnson took the oath of
office was Mrs. John F. Kennedy. Her stockings were spattered
with her husband's blood.
Gov. John B. Connally Jr. of Texas, who was riding in the same
car with Mr. Kennedy; was severely wounded in the chest, ribs
and arm. His condition was serious, but not critical.
The killer fired the rifle from a building just off the motorcade route.
Mr. Kennedy, Governor Connally and Mr. Johnson had just
received an enthusiastic welcome from a large crowd in downtown
Mr. Kennedy apparently was hit by the first of what witnesses
believed were three shots. He was driven at high speed to Dallas's
Parkland Hospital. There, in an emergency operating room, with
only physicians and nurses in attendance, he died without
Mrs. Kennedy, Mrs. Connally and a Secret Service agent were in
the car with Mrs. Kennedy and Governor Connally. Two Secret
Service agents flanked the car. Other than Mr. Connally, none of
this group was injured in the shooting. Mrs. Kennedy cried, "Oh
no" immediately after her husband was struck.
Mrs. Kennedy was in the hospital near her husband when he died,
but not in the operating room. When the body was taken from the
hospital in a bronze coffin about 2 P.M., Mrs. Kennedy walked
Her face was sorrowful. She looked steadily at the floor. She still
wore the raspberry- colored suit in which she had greeted
welcoming crowds in Forth Worth and Dallas. But she had taken
off the matching pillbox hat she wore earlier in the day, and her
dark hair was windblown and tangled. Her hand rested lightly on
her husband's coffin as it was taken to a waiting hearse.
Mrs. Kennedy climbed in beside the coffin. Then the ambulance
drove to Love Field, and Mr. Kennedy's body was placed aboard
the Presidential jet. Mrs. Kennedy then attended the swearing-in
ceremony for Mr. Johnson.
As Mr. Kennedy's body left Parkland Hospital, a few stunned
persons stood outside. Nurses and doctors, whispering among
themselves, looked from the window. A large crowd that had
gathered earlier, before it was known that the President was dead,
had been dispersed by Secret Service men and policemen.
Priests Administer Last Rites
Two priests administered last rites to Mr. Kennedy, a Roman
Catholic. They were the Very Rev. Oscar Huber, the pastor of Holy
Trinity Church in Dallas, and the Rev. James Thompson.
Mr. Johnson was sworn in as President by Federal Judge Sarah T.
Hughes of the Northern District of Texas. She was appointed to the
judgeship by Mr. Kennedy in October, 1961.
The ceremony, delayed about five minutes for Mrs. Kennedy's
arrival, took place in the private Presidential cabin in the rear of the
About 25 to 30 persons--members of the late President's staff,
members of Congress who had been accompanying the President
on a two-day tour of Texas cities and a few reporters--crowed into
the little room.
No accurate listing of those present could be obtained. Mrs.
Kennedy stood at the left of Mr. Johnson, her eyes and face
showing the signs of weeping that had apparently shaken her
since she left the hospital not long before.
Mrs. Johnson, wearing a beige dress, stood at her husband's right.
As Judge Hughes read the brief oath of office, her eyes, too, were
red from weeping. Mr. Johnson's hands rested on a black,
leather-bound Bible as Judge Hughes read and he repeated:
"I do solemnly swear that I will perform the duties of the President
of the United States to the best of my ability and defend, protect
and preserve the Constitution of the United States."
Those 34 words made Lyndon Baines Johnson, one-time farmboy
and schoolteacher of Johnson City, the President.
Johnson Embraces Mrs. Kennedy
Mr. Johnson made no statement. He embraced Mrs. Kennedy and
she held his hand for a long moment. He also embraced Mrs.
Johnson and Mrs. Evelyn Lincoln, Mr. Kennedy's private
"O.K." Mr. Johnson said. "Lets get this plane back to Washington."
At 2:46 P.M., seven minutes after he had become President, 106
minutes after Mr. Kennedy had become the fourth American
President to succumb to an assassin's wounds, the white and red
jet took off for Washington.
In the cabin when Mr. Johnson took the oath was Cecil Stoughton,
an armed forces photographer assigned to the White House.
Mr. Kennedy's staff members appeared stunned and bewildered.
Lawrence F. O'Brien, the Congressional liaison officer, and P.
Kenneth O'Donnell, the appointment secretary, both long
associates of Mr. Kennedy, showed evidences of weeping. None
had anything to say.
Other staff members believed to be in the cabin for the swearing-in
included David F. Powers, the White House receptionist; Miss
Pamela Turnure, Mrs. Kennedy's press secretary, and Malcolm
Kilduff, the assistant White House press secretary.
Mr. Kilduff announced the President's death, with choked voice and
red-rimmed eyes at about 1:36 P.M.
President John F. Kennedy died at approximately 1 o' clock
Central standard time today here in Dallas," Mr. Kilduff said at the
hospital. "He died of a gunshot wound in the brain, I have no other
details regarding the assassination of the President."
Mr. Kilduff also announced that Governor Connally had been hit by
a bullet or bullets and that Mr. Johnson, who had not yet been
sworn in, was safe in the protective custody of the Secret Service
at an unannounced place, presumably the airplane at Love Field.
Mr. Kilduff indicated that the President had been shot once. Later
medical reports raised the possibility that there had been two
wounds. But the death was caused, as far as could be learned, by
a massive wound in the brain.
Later in the afternoon, Dr. Malcolm Perry, an attending surgeon,
and Dr. Kemp Clark, chief of neurosurgery at Parkland Hospital,
gave more details.
Mr. Kennedy was hit by a bullet in the throat, just below the
Adam's apple, they said. This wound had the appearance of the
Mr. Kennedy also had a massive, gaping wound in the back and
one on the right side of the head. However, the doctors said it was
impossible to determine immediately whether the wounds had
been caused by one bullet or two.
Dr. Perry, the first physician to treat the President, said a number
of resuscitative measure had been attempted, including oxygen,
anesthesia, an indotracheal tube, a tracheotomy blood and fluids.
An eloctrocardiogram monitor was attached to measure MR.
Kennedy's heart beats.
Dr. Clark was summoned and arrived in a minute or two. By then,
Dr. Perry said, Mr. Kennedy was "critically ill and moribund," or
Dr. Clark said that on his first sight of the President he had
concluded immediately that Mr. Kennedy could not live.
"It was apparent that the President had sustained a lethal wound,"
he said. "A missile had gone in and out of the back of his head
causing external lacerations and loss of brain tissue."
Shortly after he arrived, Dr. Clark said, "the President lost his heart
action by the electrocardiogram." A closed-chest cardiograph
massage was attempted, as were other emergency resuscitation
Dr. Clark said these had produced "palpable pulses" for a short
time, but all were "to no avail."
In Operating Room 40 Minutes
The President was on the emergency table at the hospital for
about 40 minutes, the doctors said. At the end, perhaps eight
physicians were in Operating Room No. 1, where Mr. Kennedy
remained until his death. Dr. Clark said it was difficult to determine
the exact moment of death, but the doctors said officially that it
occurred at 1 P.M.
Later, there were unofficial reports that Mr. Kennedy had been
killed instantly. The source of these reports, Dr. Tom Shires, chief
surgeon a the hospital and professor of surgery at he University of
Texas Southwest Medical School, issued this statement tonight:
"Medically, it was apparent the President was not alive when he
was brought in. There was no spontaneous respiration. He had
dilated, fixed pupils. It was obvious he had a lethal head wound.
"Technically, however, by using vigorous resuscitation, intravenous
tubes and all the usual supportive measure, we were able to raise
a semblance of a heartbeat."
Dr. Shires said he was "positive it was impossible" that President
Kennedy could have spoken after being shot. "I am absolutely
sure he never knew what hit him," Dr. Shires said.
Dr. Shires was not present when Mr. Kennedy was being treated
at Parkland Hospital. He issued his statement, however, after
lengthy conferences with the doctors who had attended the
Mr. Johnson remained in the hospital about 30 minutes after Mr.
The details of what happened when shots first rang out, as the
President's car moved along at about 25 miles an hour, were
sketchy. Secret Service agents, who might have given more
details, were unavailable to the press at first, and then returned to
Washington with President Johnson.
Kennedys Hailed at Breakfast
Mr. Kennedy had opened his day in Fort Worth, first with a speech
in a parking lot and then at a Chamber of Commerce breakfast.
The breakfast appearance was a particular triumph for Mrs.
Kennedy, who entered late and was given an ovation.
Then the Presidential party, including Governor and Mrs. Connally,
flew on to Dallas, an eight-minute flight. Mr. Johnson, as is
customary, flew in a separate plane. The Presidents and the Vice
President do not travel together out of fear of a double tragedy.
At Love Field, Mr. and Mrs. Kennedy lingered for 10 minutes,
shaking hands with an enthusiastic group lining the fence. The
group called itself "Grassroots Democrats."
Mr. Kennedy then entered his open Lincoln convertible at the head
of the motorcade. He sat in the rear seat on the right-hand side.
Mrs. Kennedy, who appeared to be enjoying one of the first
political outings she had ever made with her husband, sat at his
In the "jump" seat, directly ahead of Mr. Kennedy, sat Governor
Connally, with Mrs. Connally at his left in another "jump" seat. A
Secret Service agent was driving and the two others ran alongside.
Behind the President's limousine was an open sedan carrying a
number of Secret Service agents. Behind them, in an open
convertible, rode Mr. and Mrs. Johnson and Texas's senior
Senator, Ralph W. Yarborough, a Democrat.
The motorcade proceeded uneventfully along a 10-mile route
through downtown Dallas, aiming for the Merchandise Mart. Mr.
Kennedy was to address a group of the city's leading citizens at a
luncheon in his honor.
In downtown Dallas, crowds were thick, enthusiastic and cheering.
The turnout was somewhat unusual for this center of
conservatism, where only a month ago Adlai E. Stevenson was
attacked by a rightist crowd. It was also in Dallas, during the 1960
campaign, that Senator Lyndon B. Johnson and his wife were
nearly mobbed in the lobby of the Baker Hotel.
As the motorcade neared its end and the President's car moved
out of the thick crowds onto Stennonds Freeway near the
Merchandise Mart, Mrs. Connally recalled later, "we were all very
pleased with the reception in downtown Dallas."
Approaching 3-Street Underpass
Behind the three leading cars were a string of others carrying
Texas and Dallas dignitaries, two buses of reporters, several open
cars carrying photographers and other reporters, and a bus for
White House staff members.
As Mrs. Connally recalled later, the President's car was almost
ready to go underneath a "triple underpass" beneath three
streets--Elm, Commerce and Main--when the first shot was fired.
That shot apparently struck Mr. Kennedy. Governor Connally
turned in his seat at the sound and appeared immediately to be hit
in the chest.
Mrs. Mary Norman of Dallas was standing at the curb and at that
moment was aiming her camera at the President. She saw him
slump forward, then slide down in the seat.
"My God," Mrs. Norman screamed, as she recalled it later, "he's
Mrs. Connally said that Mrs. Kennedy had reached and "grabbed"
her husband. Mrs. Connally put her arms around the Governor.
Mrs. Connally said that she and Mrs. Kennedy had then ducked
low in the car as it sped off.
Mrs. Connally's recollections were reported by Julian Reade, an
aide to the Governor.
Most reporters in the press buses were too far back to see the
shooting, but they observed some quick scurrying by motor
policemen accompanying the motorcade. It was noted that the
President's car had picked up speed and raced away, but reports
were not aware that anything serious had occurred until they
reached the Merchandise Mart two or three minutes later.
Rumors Spread at Trade Mart
Rumors of the shooting already were spreading through the
luncheon crowd of hundreds, which was having the first course.
No White House officials or Secret Service agents were present,
but the reporters were taken quickly to Parkland Hospital on the
strength of the rumors.
There they encountered Senator Yarborough, white, shaken and
The shots, he said, seemed to have come from the right and the
rear of the car in which he was riding, the third in the motorcade.
Another eyewitness, Mel Crouch, a Dallas television reported,
reported that as the shots rang out he saw a rifle extended and
then withdrawn from a window on the "fifth or sixth floor" of the
Texas Public School Book Depository. This is a leased state
building on Elm Street, to the right of the motorcade route.
Senator Yarborough said there had been a slight pause between
the first two shots and a longer pause between the second and
third. A Secret Service man riding in the Senator's car, the Senator
said, immediately ordered Mr. and Mrs. Johnson to get down below
the level of the doors. They did so, and Senator Yarborough also
The leading cars of the motorcade then pulled away at high speed
toward Parkland Hospital, which was not far away, by the fast
"We knew by the speed that something was terribly wrong,"
Senator Yarborough reported. When he put his head up, he said,
he saw a Secret Service man in the car ahead beating his fists
against the trunk deck of the car in which he was riding apparently
in frustration and anguish.
Mrs. Kennedy's Reaction
Only White House staff members spoke with Mrs. Kennedy. A
Dallas medical student, David Edwards, saw her in Parkland
Hospital while she was waiting for new of her husband. He gave
"The look in her eyes was like an animal that had been trapped, like
a little rabbit--brave, but fear was in the eyes."
Dr. Clark was reported to have informed Mrs. Kennedy of her
No witnesses reported seeing or hearing any of the Secret Service
agents or policemen fire back. One agent was seen to brandish a
machine gun as the cars sped away. Mr. Crouch observed a
policeman falling to the ground and pulling a weapon. But the
events had occurred so quickly that there was apparently noting for
the men to shoot at.
Mr. Crouch said he saw two women, standing at a curb to watch
the motorcade pass, fall to the ground when the shots rang out. He
also saw a man snatch up his little girl and run along the road.
Policemen, he said, immediately chased this man under the
impression he had been involved in the shooting, but Mr. Crouch
said he had been a fleeing spectator.
Mr. Kennedy's limousine--license No. GG300 under District of
Columbia registry--pulled up at the emergency entrance of
Parkland Hospital. Senator Yarborough said the President had
been carried inside on a stretcher.
By the time reporters arrived at the hospital, the police were
guarding the Presidential car closely. They would allow no one to
approach it. A bucket of water stood by the car, suggesting that the
back seat had been scrubbed out.
Robert Clark of the American Broadcasting Company, who had
been riding near the front of the motorcade, said Mr. Kennedy was
motionless when he was carried inside. There as a great amount
of blood on Mr. Kennedy's suit and shirtfront and the front of his
body, Mr. Clark said.
Mrs. Kennedy was leaning over her husband when the car
stopped, Mr. Clark said, and walked beside the wheeled stretcher
into the hospital. Mr. Connally sat with his hands holding his
stomach, his head bent over. He, too, was moved into the hospital
in a stretcher, with Mrs. Connally at his side.
Robert McNeill of the National Broadcasting Company, who also
was in the reporters' pool car, jumped out at the scene of the
shooting. He said the police had taken two eyewitnesses into
custody--an 8-year-old Negro boy and a white man--for
Many of these reports could not be verified immediately.
Eyewitness Describes Shooting
An unidentified Dallas man, interviewed on television here, said he
had been waving at the President when the shots were fired. His
belief was that Mr. Kennedy had been struck twice--once, as Mrs.
Norman recalled, when he slumped in his seat; again when he slid
down in it.
"It seemed to just knock him down," the man said.
Governor Connally's condition was reported as "satisfactory"
tonight after four hours in surgery at Parkland Hospital.
Dr. Robert R. Shaw a thoracic surgeon, operated on the Governor
to repair damage to his left chest.
Later, Dr. Shaw said Governor Connally had been hit in the back
just below the shoulder blade, and that the bullet had gone
completely through the Governor's chest, taking out part of the fifth
After leaving the body, he said, the bullet struck the Governor's
right wrist, causing a compound fracture. It then lodged in the left
The thigh wound, Dr. Shaw said, was trivial. He said the
compound fracture would heal.
Dr. Shaw said it would be unwise for Governor Connally to be
moved in the next 10 to 14 days. Mrs. Connally was remaining at
his side tonight.
Tour by Mrs. Kennedy Unusual
Mrs. Kennedy's presence near her husband's bedside at his
death resulted from somewhat unusual circumstances. She had
rarely accompanied him on his trips about the country and had
almost never made political trips with him.
The tour on which Mr. Kennedy was engaged yesterday and today
was only quasi- political; the only open political activity was to have
been a speech tonight to a fund- raising dinner at the state capitol
In visiting Texas, Mr. Kennedy was seeking to improve his political
fortunes in a pivotal state that he barely won in 1960. He was also
hoping to patch a bitter internal dispute among Texas's
At 8: 45 A.M., when Mr. Kennedy left the Texas Hotel in Fort
Worth, where he spent his last night, to address, the parking lot
crowd across the street, Mrs. Kennedy was not with him. There
appeared to be some disappointment.
"Mrs. Kennedy is organizing herself," the President said
good-naturedly. "It takes longer, but, of course, she looks better
than we do when she does it."
Later, Mrs. Kennedy appeared late at the Chamber of Commerce
breakfast in Fort Worth.
Again, Mr. Kennedy took note of her presence. "Two years ago,"
he said "I introduced myself in Paris by saying that I was the man
who had accompanied Mrs. Kennedy to Paris. I am getting
somewhat that same sensation as I travel around Texas. Nobody
wonders what Lyndon and I wear."
The speech Mr. Kennedy never delivered at the Merchandise Mart
luncheon contained a passage commenting on a recent
preoccupation of his, and a subject of much interest in this city,
where right-wing conservatism is the rule rather than the
Voices are being herd in the land, he said, "voices preaching
doctrines wholly unrelated to reality, wholly unsuited to the sixties,
doctrines which apparently assume that words will suffice without
weapons, that vituperation is as good as victory and that peace is
a sign of weakness."
The speech went on: At a time when the national debt is steadily
being reduced in terms of its burden on our economy, they see
that debt as the greatest threat to our security. At a time when we
are steadily reducing the number of Federal employes serving
every thousand citizens, they fear those supposed hordes of civil
servants far more than the actual hordes of opposing armies.
"We cannot expect that everyone, to use the phrase of a decade
ago, will 'talk sense to the American people.' But we can hope that
fewer people will listen to nonsense. And the notion that this nation
is headed for defeat through deficit, or that strength is but a matter
of slogans, is nothing but just plain nonsense."
The New York Times Admits That Virtually Every Major News
Organization Allows The News To Be Censored By Government Officials
Michael, on July 23rd, 2012
one of the most shocking articles that the New York Times has ever
put out, a New York Times reporter has openly admitted that
virtually every major mainstream news organization allows government
bureaucrats and campaign officials to censor their stories. For
example, almost every major news organization in the country has
agreed to submit virtually all quotes from anyone involved in the
Obama campaign or the Romney campaign to gatekeepers for “quote
approval” before they will be published. If the gatekeeper in the
Obama campaign does not want a certain quote to get out, the
American people will not see it, and the same thing applies to the
Romney campaign. The goal is to keep the campaigns as “on message”
as possible and to avoid gaffes at all cost. But this kind of thing
is not just happening with political campaigns. According
to the New York Times, “quote approval” has become “commonplace
throughout Washington”. In other words, if you see a quote in the
newspaper from someone in the federal government then it is safe to
say that a gatekeeper has almost certainly reviewed that quote and
has approved it. This is another sign that “the free and independent
media” in this country is a joke. What we get from the mainstream
media is a very highly filtered form of propaganda, and that is one
reason why Americans are turning away from the mainstream media in
droves. People want the truth, and more Americans than ever realize
that they are not getting it from the mainstream media.
following quote comes from the recent article in
the New York Times mentioned above and it is absolutely jaw
The quotations come back redacted, stripped of colorful
metaphors, colloquial language and anything even mildly provocative.
They are sent by e-mail from the Obama headquarters in
Chicago to reporters who have interviewed campaign officials under
one major condition: the press office has veto power over what
statements can be quoted and attributed by name.
Most reporters, desperate to pick the brains of the
president’s top strategists, grudgingly agree. After the interviews,
they review their notes, check their tape recorders and send in the
juiciest sound bites for review.
The verdict from the campaign — an operation that prides
itself on staying consistently on script — is often no, Barack Obama
does not approve this message.
an article that everyone needs to read. If you have not read it yet,
you can find it
all of this means is that both the Obama campaign and the Romney
campaign essentially have “veto power” over any quotes from those
campaigns that we see in the newspapers.
to the New York Times, virtually every major news organization
has agreed to submit their quotes for “quote approval”….
It was difficult to find a news outlet that had not
agreed to quote approval, albeit reluctantly. Organizations like
Bloomberg, The Washington Post, Vanity Fair, Reuters and The New
York Times have all consented to interviews under such terms.
absolutely disgusting, and it goes against everything that our media
is supposed to stand for.
All I can say about these people I once considered
“colleagues” is that I am so ashamed of them. I am mortified. They
are humiliating themselves and a vital institution for any free
It seems the biggest threat to the American tradition of
a free and independent press is not government coercion. It’s the
willing submission of the press to being handled and managed by
government and politicians.
mind that Joseph Farah has been working in the world of journalism
for decades. He is deeply saddened to see what is happening to a
profession that he deeply loves.
is not the only one.
check out what Dan Rather had to say during a speech
back in 2009….
“At my age and stage I’ve finally reached the point where
I don’t have to kiss up to anybody,” he said. “What a wonderful
feeling it is.”
Even so, his talk emphasized what he believes is the
erosion of quality journalism, because of the corporatization,
politicization, and “trivialization” of news. Those three factors,
Rather argued, have fueled the “dumbing down and sleezing up of
news” and the decline of “great American journalism.”
Likening media consolidation to that of the banking
industry, Rather claimed that “roughly 80 percent” of the media is
controlled by no more than six, and possibly as few as four,
Rather is right. The control over the media in the United States is
more tightly concentrated than ever before.
the early 1980s, approximately
50 corporations essentially had nearly total control of the
media in the United States.
just six monolithic media corporations dominate virtually everything
you watch, hear and read.
six gigantic corporations own television networks, publishing
houses, movie studios, newspapers, radio stations, music labels and
video game companies. Most Americans are absolutely addicted to
information and entertainment, and those six massive corporations
supply the vast majority of the information and entertainment that
Americans take in.
amount of control that those six corporate giants have is absolutely
incredible. For example, the average American watches
153 hours of television a month. If you can beam 153 hours of
“programming” into someone’s head each month, that gives you an
awesome amount of influence over that person.
monolithic corporations mentioned above are Time Warner, Walt
Disney, Viacom, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., CBS Corporation and NBC
are some areas of the media that are not completely dominated by
those corporations, but even control over those areas is becoming
more highly concentrated than ever.
Clear Channel now owns over 1000 radio stations across the
United States. The power that Clear Channel has over the radio
industry in America is absolutely staggering.
control over the Internet is becoming much more concentrated. Giant
corporations such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are
increasingly controlling what we see and hear online.
really is the “big six” that dominate most of what we see, hear and
read on a daily basis.
a previous article, I detailed a portion of the vast media
holdings of these gigantic corporations….
Below are highly revealing
excerpts of key news articles from the
mainstream media suggesting major cover-ups.
Links are provided to the full articles on their major
media websites. If any link fails to function,
click here. These news articles are listed
by order of importance. For the same list by
click here. For the list by date of news
click here. For headlines and links only to
key news articles,
click here. By choosing to educate ourselves
spread the word, we can and will
build a brighter future.
In the early 1960s, America's top
military leaders reportedly drafted plans to
kill innocent people and commit acts of
terrorism in U.S. cities to create public
support for a war against Cuba.
Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly
included the possible assassination of Cuban
émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the
high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S.
ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism
in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways
to trick the American public and the
international community into supporting a war to
oust Cuba's ... Fidel Castro. America's top
military brass even contemplated causing U.S.
military casualties, writing: "We could blow up
a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba,"
and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would
cause a helpful wave of national indignation."
The plans had the written approval of all of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to
President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert
McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently
were rejected by the civilian leadership and
have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. The
Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential
death of astronaut John Glenn during the first
attempt to put an American into orbit as a false
pretext for war with Cuba. Should the rocket
explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, "the
objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that
the fault lies with the Communists." The scary
thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40
Why was ABC the only major news source to report
on this highly revealing story? To read the
shocking declassified documents on Operation
click here. Many military and political
leaders look at the world as a
chess board. Sacrificing pawns (innocent
civilians) is sometimes necessary to capture the
queen. For other revealing news articles on
click here. For revealing 9/11 news
A newly declassified document gives a fascinating
glimpse into the US military's plans for
"information operations". The declassified
document is called "Information Operations
Roadmap". It was obtained by the
National Security Archive at George
Washington University using the Freedom of
Information Act. Officials in the Pentagon wrote
it in 2003. The Secretary of Defense, Donald
Rumsfeld, signed it. The operations described in
the document include a surprising range of
military activities: public affairs officers who
brief journalists, psychological operations
troops who try to manipulate the thoughts and
beliefs of an enemy, computer network attack
specialists who seek to destroy enemy networks.
The military's psychological operations, or
Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer
and television screens of ordinary Americans.
"Psyops messages will often be replayed by the
news media for much larger audiences, including
the American public. Strategy should be based on
the premise that the Department [of Defense]
will 'fight the net' as it would an enemy
weapons system," it reads. The document
recommends that the United States should seek
the ability to "provide maximum control of the
entire electromagnetic spectrum". US forces should
be able to "disrupt or destroy the full spectrum
of globally emerging communications systems,
sensors, and weapons systems dependent on the
electromagnetic spectrum". The
fact that the "Information Operations Roadmap"
is approved by the Secretary of Defense suggests
that these plans are taken very seriously indeed
in the Pentagon.
For other revealing news articles on military
click here. For other revealing news
articles on government corruption,
How much influence do private networks of the rich
and powerful have on government policies and
international relations? One group, the
Bilderberg, has often attracted speculation that
it forms a shadowy global government. Every year since 1954 [they have
brought] together about 120 leading business
people and politicians. At this year's meeting
in Germany, the audience included the heads of
the World Bank and European Central Bank,
Chairmen or Chief Executives from Nokia, BP,
Unilever, DaimlerChrysler and Pepsi ... editors
from five major newspapers, members of
parliament, ministers, European commissioners
... and the queen of the Netherlands. The
chairman ... is 73-year-old Viscount Etienne
Davignon. In an extremely rare interview, he
played down the importance of Bilderberg. "I
don't think (we are) a global ruling class
because I don't think a global ruling class
exists." Will Hutton ... who attended a
Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people take
part in these networks in order to influence the
way the world works, to create what he calls
"the international common sense". And that
"common sense" is one which supports the
interests of Bilderberg's main participants. For
Bilderberg's critics the fact that there is
almost no publicity about the annual meetings is
proof that they are up to no good. Bilderberg
meetings often feature future political leaders
shortly before they become household names. Bill
Clinton went in 1991 while still governor of
Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later
while still an opposition MP.
All the recent presidents of the European
Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before
they were appointed. Informal and private
networks like Bilderberg have helped to oil the
wheels of global politics and globalisation for
the past half a century.
Why is this meeting of top world leaders kept so
secret? Why, until a few years ago, was there
virtually no reporting on this influential group
major media? Thankfully, the
alternative media has had some good
articles. And a
Google search can be highly informative. For
many other revealing news articles from major
media sources on powerful secret societies,
click here. And for those interested in
exploring reliable information covering the big
picture of how and why these secret societies
are using government-sponsored mind control
programs to achieve their agenda,
On Sept. 10 , Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign
terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home.
It's the Pentagon bureaucracy." He said money
wasted by the military poses a serious threat.
Rumsfeld promised change but the next day—Sept.
11—the world changed and in the rush to fund the
war on terrorism, the war on waste seems to have
been forgotten. Just last week President Bush
announced, "my 2003 budget calls for more than
$48 billion in new defense spending." More money
for the Pentagon ... while its own auditors
admit the military cannot account for 25 percent
of what it spends. "According to
some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in
transactions," Rumsfeld admitted. $2.3
trillion—that's $8,000 for every man, woman and
child in America. A former
Marine turned whistle-blower is risking his job
by speaking out ... about the millions he
noticed were missing from one defense agency's
balance sheets. Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and
Accounting Service ... tried to follow the money
trail, even crisscrossing the country looking
for records. "The director looked at me and said
'Why do you care about this stuff?' It took me
aback. My supervisor asking me why I care about
doing a good job," said Minnery. He was
reassigned and says officials then covered up
the problem. The Pentagon's Inspector General
"partially substantiated" several of Minnery's
To see the CBS video clip of this shocking
click here. For another key clip,
click here. For other media articles
revealing major corruption,
click here. Even though originally not
reported because of the trauma of 9/11, why
wasn't this news broadcast far and wide later?
Why isn't it making media headlines now? For
other revealing news articles on military
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in
the suicide attacks on Washington and New York
has turned up alive and well. The identities of
four of the 19 suspects accused of having
carried out the attacks are now in doubt. Saudi
Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five
men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed
American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade
Centre on 11 September. His photograph was
released, and has since appeared in newspapers
and on television around the world. He told
journalists there that he had nothing to do with
the attacks. He has contacted both the Saudi and
American authorities. He acknowledges
that he attended flight training school at
Daytona Beach in the United States, and is
indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI
has been referring. But, he says, he left the
United States in September last year
[and] became a pilot with Saudi Arabian
airlines. Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the
Flight 11 hijack suspects ... says he is an
engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost
his passport while studying in Denver. Meanwhile
... a London-based Arabic daily says it has
interviewed Saeed Alghamdi. He was listed by the
FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that
crashed in Pennsylvania. And there are
suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al
Midhar, may also be alive. FBI Director Robert
Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the
identity of several of the suicide hijackers is
The deceptions in the official story of 9/11 are
nowhere more clearly shown than in this
important story. The FBI never revised its list
of alleged hijackers, and these four are all
later listed in the official 9/11 Commission
report as the hijackers.
Click here and scroll down a little over
half way to see their photos in the official
report. For more on this,
click here. For an abundance of reliable
information suggesting a major 9/11 cover-up,
click here. For other revealing news
articles on 9/11,
Findings of the Select Committee on Assassinations in
the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy
in Dallas, Tex., November 22, 1963. Scientific
acoustical evidence establishes a high
probability that two gunmen fired at President
John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does
not preclude the possibility of two gunmen
firing at the President.
The committee believes, on the basis of the
evidence available to it, that President John F.
Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of
a conspiracy. The committee is
unable to identify the other gunman or the
extent of the conspiracy. The [original]
investigation into the possibility of conspiracy
in the assassination was inadequate. The
conclusions of the investigations were arrived
at in good faith, but presented in a fashion
that was too definitive. The Department of
Justice failed to exercise initiative in
supervising and directing the investigation by
the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the
assassination. The Federal
Bureau of Investigation failed to investigate
adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to
assassinate the President. The Central
Intelligence Agency was deficient in its
collection and sharing of information
both prior to and subsequent to the
assassination. The Warren Commission failed to
investigate adequately the possibility of a
conspiracy to assassinate the President.
US Congressional report, on the subject of
the Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination,
states that "The committee believes, on the
basis of the circumstantial evidence available
to it, that there is a likelihood that James
Earl Ray assassinated Dr. Martin Luther King as
a result of a conspiracy." Why hasn't this
information been widely reported and become
public knowledge? For a possible answer,
click here. For other revealing news
articles on assassinations,
Researchers from the Argonne National Laboratory in
Illinois have developed a hack that, for about
$26 and an 8th-grade science education, can
remotely manipulate the electronic voting
machines used by millions of voters all across
the U.S. The researchers ... performed their
proof-of-concept hack on a Diebold Accuvote TS
electronic voting machine, a type of touchscreen
Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting system
that is widely used for government elections.
Diebold's voting-machine business is now owned
by the Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems,
whose e-voting machines are used in about 22
states. Roger Johnston and Jon Warner from
Argonne National Laboratory's Vulnerability
Assessment Team demonstrate three different ways
an attacker could tamper with, and remotely take
full control, of the e-voting machine simply by
attaching what they call a piece of "alien
electronics" into the machine's circuit board.
electronic hacking tool consists of a $1.29
microprocessor and a circuit board that costs
about $8. Together with the $15 remote control,
which enabled the researchers to modify votes
from up to a half-mile away, the whole hack runs
Why isn't this making news headlines? For more
on this critical development,
click here. For many other news articles on
serious problems with elections,
The U.S. government's official line may be that
unidentified flying objects (UFOs) don't pose a
national security threat, but a group of former
Air Force officers gathered Monday in the
nation's capital to tell a different story.
During a press conference at the National Press
Club in Washington, D.C., seven former Air Force
officers once stationed at nuclear bases around
the country said that not only have UFOs visited
Air Force bases, some have succeeded in
disabling nuclear missiles stationed there. "I
want the government to acknowledge that this
phenomenon exists," said
Robert Salas, a former U.S. Air Force
Nuclear Launch Officer. Salas said he
doesn't think the UFOs he claims to have
encountered had any offensive intent, but he
believes they wanted to leave an impression."They
wanted to shine a light on our nuclear weapons
and just send us a message," he said. "My
interpretation is the message is get rid of them
because it's going to mean our destruction."
Other former officers recounted similar stories
of unexplained moving lights and odd-shaped
flying objects during their time in the service.
Leslie Kean, an investigative journalist and
author of the new book "UFOs:
Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on
the Record," said thousands of pages of
documentation support the officers' accounts.
She spent the last 10 years researching UFOs and
combing through thousands of pages of
declassified government material. Kean said that
one declassified document that she researched
for her book, relating to the Salas incident,
said, "the fact that no apparent reason for the
loss of the 10 missiles can easily be identified
is a cause for grave concern to this
To watch 18-minutes of this most fascinating
testimony on the CNN website,
click here. This is not the first time
government and military witnesses have testified
at the National Press Club about a major
cover-up of UFOs. To watch 22 witnesses
testifying to remarkable personal stories in May
click here. For a two-page written summary
of amazing UFO testimony from top officials,
click here. For more fascinating news
articles on UFOs,
Some of the world's biggest, most profitable
corporations enjoy a far lower tax rate than you
do--that is, if they pay taxes at all. The most
egregious example is General Electric. Last year
the conglomerate generated $10.3 billion in
pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to
Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of
$1.1 billion. How did this happen? It's
complicated. GE in effect consists of two
divisions: General Electric Capital and
everything else. The everything else--maker of
engines, power plants, TV shows and the
like--would have paid a 22% tax rate if it was a
standalone company. It's GE Capital that keeps
the overall tax bill so low. Over the last two
GE Capital has displayed an uncanny ability to
lose lots of money in the U.S. (posting a $6.5
billion loss in 2009), and make lots of money
overseas (a $4.3 billion gain). Not only do the
U.S. losses balance out the overseas gains, but
GE can defer taxes on that overseas income
indefinitely. It's the tax
benefit of overseas operations that is the
biggest reason why multinationals end up with
lower tax rates than the rest of us.
Can you believe that GE not only pays no taxes,
they actually get credit from the US government?
They ship US jobs overseas and then reap huge
tax benefits as a result. What's wrong with this
picture? For a wealth of media news articles on
the hidden manipulations of major financial
Imagine being able to convert water into a boundless
source of cheap energy. That's what BlackLight
Power, a 25-employee firm in Cranbury, N.J.,
says it can do. The only problem: Most
scientists say that company's technology
violates the basic laws of physics. Such
skepticism doesn't daunt Dr. Randell Mills, a
Harvard-trained physician and founder of
BlackLight, who recently claimed that he has
created a working fuel cell using the world's
most pervasive element: the hydrogen found in
water. Mills says he has a market-ready product:
a fuel cell that produces a chemical reaction to
alter hydrogen atoms. The fuel cell releases
heat that turns water into steam, which drives
electric turbines. The working models in his lab
generate 50 kilowatts of electricity - enough to
power six or seven houses. But these, Mills
says, can be scaled [up] to drive a large,
electric power plant. The inventor
claims this electricity will cost less than 2
cents per kilowatt-hour, which compares to a
national average of 8.9 cents.
Mills developed the patented cocktail that
enables the reaction - a solid fuel made of
hydrogen and a sodium hydride catalyst - only a
year ago. (He recently posted instructions on
the company's Web site,
blacklightpower.com). Now that the device is
ready for commercialization, he says, BlackLight
is negotiating with several utilities and
architecture and engineering firms. The business,
Mills says, has attracted $60 million in funding
from wealthy individuals, investment firms ...
and it is no longer seeking money. BlackLight's board of directors reads
like a Who's Who of finance and energy leaders.
For two New York Times articles showing
the viability of this amazing technology,
click here and
here. For many other exciting major media
news articles on new energy inventions,
For more than 50 years, the National Prayer Breakfast
has been a Washington institution. Every
president has attended the breakfast since
Eisenhower. Besides the presidents ... the one
constant presence at the National Prayer
Breakfast has been Douglas Coe. Although he’s
not an ordained minister, the 79-year-old Coe is
the most important religious leader you've never
seen or heard. Scores of
senators in both parties ... go to small weekly
Senate prayer groups that Coe attends,
[including] senators John McCain, Barack Obama
and Hillary Clinton. Observers
who have investigated Coe’s group, called The
Fellowship Foundation, [describe] a secretive
organization. Coe repeatedly
urges a personal commitment to Jesus Christ.
It’s a commitment Coe compares to the blind
devotion that Adolph Hitler demanded. "Hitler,
Goebbels and Himmler. Think of the immense power
these three men had.” Coe also
quoted Jesus and said: “One of the things
[Jesus] said is 'If any man comes to me and does
not hate his father, mother, brother, sister,
his own life, he can't be a disciple.’" Writer
Jeff Sharlet ... lived among Coe's followers six
years ago, and came out troubled by their
secrecy and rhetoric. “We were being taught the
leadership lessons of Hitler, Lenin and Mao.
Hitler’s genocide wasn’t really an issue for
them. It was the strength that he emulated,”
said Sharlet, who ... has now written about The
Fellowship, also known to insiders as The
Family, in [a] book called
The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of
This article strangely has been removed from the
MSNBC website, though you can still access it
Internet Archive. Watch the incredible
four-minute NBC video clip showing Coe praising
a communist Red Guard member for cutting the
head off his mother at
this link. For more on Coe's powerful links
to Congress and corruption, see the MSNBC
available here. And for powerful inside
information from a mind programmer who claims to
have escaped from "the family," and another who
says he is from a very high level there,
click here and
here. To develop an understanding of the
bigger picture behind all of this,
There are no magic bullets in the fight against
cancer: that's the first thing every responsible
scientist mentions when discussing a possible
new treatment, no matter how promising. If there
were a magic bullet, though, it might be
something like dichloroacetate, or DCA, a drug
that kills cancer cells by exploiting a
fundamental weakness found in a wide range of
solid tumors. So far, though, it kills them just
in test tubes and in rats infected with human
cancer cells; it has never been tested against
cancer in living human beings. DCA ... is an
existing drug whose side effects are
well-studied and relatively tolerable. Also,
it's a small molecule that might be able to
cross the blood-brain barrier to reach otherwise
intractable brain tumors. Within days after a
technical paper on DCA appeared in the journal
Cancer Cell last week, the lead author, Dr.
Evangelos Michelakis of the University of
Alberta, was deluged with calls and e-mails from
prospective patients—to whom he can say only,
“Hang in there.” DCA is a remarkably simple
molecule. It acts in the body to promote the
activity of the mitochondria. Researchers have
assumed that the mitochondria in cancer cells
were irreparably damaged. But Michelakis
wondered if that was really true. With his
colleagues he used DCA to turn back on the
mitochondria in cancer cells—which promptly
One of the great things about DCA is that it's a
simple compound, in the public domain, and could
be produced for pennies a dose. But that's also
a problem, because big drug companies are
unlikely to spend a billion dollars or so on
large-scale clinical trials for a compound they
can't patent. (Anyone
interested in helping can click here)
For a 2010 follow-up by Dr. Michelakis with
click here and watch a 10-minute video at
this link. For the DCA website,
click here. Thank you Newsweek for this important article. Why haven't any
other mass media reported this major story?
Why aren't many millions of dollars being poured
into research? Notice even
acknowledges the drug companies are not
interested in finding a cure for cancer if they
can't make a profit from it.
Some suspect the drug companies have even
suppressed cancer cures found in the past. For
one amazing example of this,
click here. More on DCA
The man behind the latest YouTube sensation has
spoken out for the first time about his global
cuddling controversy. Serial hugger Juan Mann
describes the free hugs he hands out...as
fast-food emotion. His cuddling campaign
received an international dose of publicity
a clip showing his public displays of
affection won a coveted front page spot on the
video sharing website. An American television
audience of millions also watched him at work,
when the video was broadcast on the prime-time
breakfast program Good Morning America
yesterday. Today, the hugger was at it again,
brandishing his "free hugs" sign in the busy
pedestrian thoroughfare, and having quite a few
people take him up on his offer. "It's a way to
make people smile," Mann said. "For every person
who gets a hug, you see five walk past with a
smile on their face." But his efforts to spread
the love became a little too popular for some
people's liking, according to a blurb on the
YouTube video, which said: "As this symbol
of human hope spread across the city, police and
officials ordered the Free Hugs campaign
BANNED." Undeterred, Mann collected more than
10,000 signatures on a petition he presented to
the City of Sydney council.
Demands for a halt to the hugs petered out
shortly after, and the end of the clip shows
Mann hugging an official. City worker Elly
Mitchell, who handed out a few free hugs on her
lunch break today, said she was inspired to
organise [an] event after seeing the video
online. "We're going to hug the city," Ms
If you haven't seen this powerfully inspiring
four-minute video clip, join the over 10 million
who have by
clicking here. The free hugs movement is
rapidly spreading around the world! Click
here to see more. For several other short,
deeply inspiring videos,
Pres. Bush and John Kerry were both
members of the secret organization. ‘Skull and
dates to 1832. It was in fact a reaction to a
secret society, the Masons. Founder William
Huntington Russell thought of his little enclave
as sort of anti-Masons and as a home for the
wealthy and the powerful ... who would do
anything for another Bonesman. Each year, 15
young undergraduate seniors are tapped for
membership. Members of ‘Skull and Bones’ gather
on High Street in the Yale campus at the tomb.
New members, the neophytes, are expected to do
things like lie in coffins, wrestle in mud, kiss
a skull, and confess their sexual histories in
front of the group to bond themselves together.
Once you‘re in, you‘re in: ‘Skull and Bones’ is
for life. There are a lot of [famous] Bonesmen
... Henry Luce, who created “TIME” magazine;
Harold Stanley, founder of Morgan Stanley;
William F. Buckley; Averell Harriman, long-time
governor of New York. And then there
are the presidents: William Howard Taft, whose
father, Alphonso, had helped found the group;
George Herbert Walker Bush, whose father,
Prescott, was a Bonesman and a senator; the
current President Bush. [And
there's] John Kerry, Bonesman class of ‘66. His
wife Teresa Kerry‘s first husband, John Heinz
... was ‘Skull and Bones.’ Both Bush and Kerry
refused to answer ‘Meet the Press’ host Tim
Russert when asked about the organization.
Alexandra Robbins, author of “Secrets of the
Tombs" [said] "The sole purpose of Skull and
Bones is to get members into positions of power
and then to have those members hire other
members to prominent positions, which is
something that President Bush has done."
For a highly revealing, four-minute CNN News
clip on Skull and Bones,
click here. For other major media video
clips reporting on this powerful secret society,
click here. Many have claimed that secret
societies have not had much influence on world
politics. This article and videos raises many
serious questions about this. For those
interested in exploring reliable information
covering the big picture of how and why these
secret societies are using government-sponsored
mind control programs to achieve their agenda,
click here. And for other revealing media
news articles on powerful secret societies,
U.S. military sources have given the FBI
information that suggests five of the alleged
hijackers of the planes that were used in [the
9/11] terror attacks received training at secure
U.S. military installations in the 1990s.
Three of the alleged hijackers listed
their address on drivers licenses and car
registrations as the Naval Air Station in
Pensacola, Fla. -- known as the "Cradle of U.S.
Navy Aviation," according to a high-ranking U.S.
Navy source. Another of the alleged hijackers
may have been trained in strategy and tactics at
the Air War College in Montgomery, Ala.,
said another high-ranking Pentagon official. The
fifth man may have received language instruction
at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex.
Both were former Saudi Air Force pilots who had
come to the United States, according to the
Pentagon source. The five men were on a list of
19 people identified as hijackers by the FBI on
[September 14]. The three foreign nationals
training in Pensacola appear to be Saeed
Alghamdi and Ahmad Alnami, who were among the
four men who allegedly commandeered United
Airlines Flight 93. That flight [ended in] rural
Pennsylvania. The third man who may have trained
in Pensacola, Ahmed Alghamdi, allegedly helped
highjack United Airlines Flight 75, which hit
the south tower of the World Trade Center.
Military records show that the three used as
their address 10 Radford Boulevard, a base
roadway on which residences for foreign-military
flight trainees are located.
For more on this vitally important news, see the
Post news article
available here and the Los Angeles Times news article
here. Several of the alleged hijackers also
contacted US media shortly after 9/11 to report
that they were alive and were not on the
hijacked planes. See the
BBC News and
of London news articles on this. Yet the 9/11 Commission Report lists these men as the official
this link. So what's really going on here?
For many other major media news articles
suggesting that rogue elements of government
were involved in 9/11,
click here. For our reliable 9/11
"Gentlemen! We have called you together to inform you
that we are going to overthrow the United States
government." So begins a statement being
delivered by Gen. Carl W. Steiner. At least the
voice sounds amazingly like him. But it is not
Steiner. It is the result of voice "morphing"
technology developed at the Los Alamos National
Laboratory in New Mexico. Psychological
PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to
exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy
governments, militaries and populations to
pursue national and battlefield objectives.
Covert operators kicked around the idea of
creating a computer-faked videotape of Saddam
Hussein crying or showing other such manly
weaknesses, or in some sexually compromising
situation. The nascent plan was for the tapes to
be flooded into Iraq and the Arab world. The
tape war never proceeded ... but the "strategic"
PSYOPS scheming didn't die. What if the U.S.
projected a holographic image of Allah floating
over Baghdad urging the Iraqi people and Army to
rise up against Saddam? According to a military
physicist given the task of looking into the
hologram idea, the feasibility had been
established of projecting large,
three-dimensional objects that appeared to float
in the air. A super secret
program was established in 1994 to pursue the
very technology for PSYOPS application. The
"Holographic Projector" is described in a
classified Air Force document as a system to
"project information power from space ... for
special operations deception missions."
Note: If the above link fails,
click here. If you want to understand some
of the many hidden capabilities of the U.S.
military, this article is a must read. For other
revealing news articles on the use of these
The Central Intelligence Agency conducted
a 14-year program to find ways to "control human
behavior" through the use of chemical,
biological and radiological material, according to agency documents made public today by John
The documents ... suggested broader
experimentation on unwitting humans by the
intelligence agency or its paid researchers than
had been publicly known before.
Mr. Marks distributed 20 documents that
described the following incidents, among others:
In 1956, the C.I.A. contracted with a private
physician to test "bulbocapnine," a drug that
can cause stupor or induce a catatonic state, on
monkeys and "convicts incarcerated at" an
unnamed state penitentiary. A letter from an
unnamed C.I.A. official in 1949 discussed ways
of killing people without leaving a trace. "I
believe that there are two chemical substances
which would be most useful in that they would
leave no characteristic pathological findings,"
the letter said. In 1952, two Russian agents who
were "suspected of being doubled" were
interrogated using "narcohypnotic" methods. The
two men were given sodium pentothal and a
stimulant. One interrogation produced a
"remarkable" regression, the papers said, during
which "the subject actually relived certain past
activities of his life. The subject totally
accepted Mr. [name deleted] as an old and
trusted and beloved personal friend whom the
subject had known in years past in Georgia,
U.S.S.R." The C.I.A. conducted secret medical
experiments from 1949 through 1963 under the
code names Bluebird, Artichoke, MK Ultra and MK
If the above link fails,
click here. For a one-minute video clip
showing Congressional testimony on a dart gun
which causes a heart attack without leaving any
click here. For lots more reliable,
verifiable information suggesting a major
cover-up of government mind control programs,
click here. For other revealing news
articles on mind control,
A posthypnotic of the night before (pointed finger,
you will sleep) was enacted. Misses [deleted]
and [deleted] immediately progressed to a deep
hypnotic state with no further suggestion. Miss
[deleted] was then instructed (having previously
expressed a fear of firearms in any fashion)
that she would use every method at her disposal
to awaken Miss [deleted] (now in a deep hypnotic
sleep) and failing this, she would pick up a
pistol nearby and fire it at Miss [deleted]. She
was instructed that her rage would be so great
that she would not hesitate to “kill” [deleted]
for failing to awaken. Miss [deleted] carried
out these suggestions to the letter including
firing the (unloaded) gun at [deleted] and then
proceeding to fall into a deep sleep. Both were
awakened and expressed complete amnesia for the
entire sequence. Miss [deleted] was again handed
the gun, which she refused (in an awakened
state) to pick up or accept from the operator.
She expressed absolute denial that the foregoing
sequence had happened.
This text is quoted from page 1 of declassified
CIA document MORI ID 190691. To verify the
statement in the text, make a FOIA (Freedom of
Information Act) request as
described here, or directly view a scanned
online here. To access thousands of pages of
declassified CIA mind control documents online,
click here. For lots more reliable
information on this crucial topic,
click here. For many revealing news articles
on mind control,
The Pentagon porn story began in 2006. An Immigration
and Customs Enforcement [ICE] child pornography
sting operation called Project Flicker produced
payment records of about 5,200 people, many of
whom provided Army or fleet zip codes or
military e-mail addresses. Subsequently, the
Pentagon's investigative branch, DCIS, began
going through the ICE list to identify who
actually was a DOD employee. The investigation,
however, only ran for eight months, and only
cross-checked some 3,500 names for Pentagon
ties. According to DCIS documents revealed in a
Freedom of Information Act request, out of that
3,500, investigators uncovered 264 employees or
contractors, including staffers for the
secretary of defense. Nine people had top
security clearances. But only about
20 percent of those 264 people were completely
investigated. Fewer still were prosecuted. After
about eight months, the entire probe was halted.
It left about 1,700 names totally unchecked,
1,700 alleged kiddie porn customers, an unknown
number of whom may still work in some capacity
for the Defense Department. Late last summer,
after investigations by "The
Boston Globe" and
Yahoo! News revealed the figures, a Pentagon
spokesman promised to reopen the investigation,
conceding that DCIS had stopped due to lack of
resources. DCIS says it is now revisiting all
5,200 names. They have now identified 302
employees or staffers. [Yet] of the 302
people confirmed as DOD personnel or
contractors, only 70 of them were actually
To see the CNN video clip of this important
click here. Isn't it interesting that the
Pentagon, with it's huge budget, claims the
investigation was stopped due to "lack of
resources." If you are ready to see how
investigations into a massive child sex abuse
ring have led to the highest levels of
government, watch the suppressed Discovery
Channel documentary "Conspiracy of Silence,"
There he was, five decades later, the priest who had
raped Joe Callander in Massachusetts. The photo
in the Roman Catholic newsletter showed him with
a smile across his wrinkled face, near-naked
Amazon Indian children in his arms and at his
feet. The Rev. Mario Pezzotti was working with
children and supervising other priests in
Brazil. It's not an isolated example. In an
investigation spanning 21 countries across six
continents, The Associated Press found 30 cases
of priests accused of abuse who were transferred
or moved abroad. Some escaped police
investigations. Many had access to children in
another country, and some abused again. A priest
who admitted to abuse in Los Angeles went to the
Philippines, where U.S. church officials mailed
him checks and advised him not to reveal their
source. A priest in Canada was convicted of
sexual abuse and then moved to France, where he
was convicted of abuse again in 2005. Another
priest was moved back and forth between Ireland
and England, despite being diagnosed as a
pederast, a man who commits sodomy with boys.
pattern is if a priest gets into trouble and
it's close to becoming a scandal or if the law
might get involved, they send them to the
missions abroad," said Richard
Sipe, a former Benedictine monk and critic of
what he says is a practice of international
transfers of accused and admitted priest child
abusers. "Anything to
avoid a scandal."
This is only the tip of the iceberg. If you want
to understand how pedophile rings have
infiltrated the highest levels of government,
don't miss the powerful Discovery Channel
documentary on this