Below are highly revealing
excerpts of key news articles
from the mainstream media
suggesting major cover-ups.
Links are provided to the full
articles on their major media
websites. If any link fails to
function,
click here. These news
articles are listed by order of
importance. For the same list by
date posted,
click here. For the list by
date of news article,
click here. For headlines
and links only to key news
articles,
click here. By choosing to
educate ourselves and to
spread the word, we can and
will
build a brighter future.
In the early 1960s, America's
top military leaders reportedly drafted
plans to kill innocent people and commit
acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to
create public support for a war against
Cuba. Code named
Operation Northwoods, the plans
reportedly included the possible
assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking
boats of Cuban refugees on the high
seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a
U.S. ship, and even orchestrating
violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The
plans were developed as ways to trick
the American public and the
international community into supporting
a war to oust Cuba's ... Fidel Castro.
America's top military brass even
contemplated causing U.S. military
casualties, writing: "We could blow up a
U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame
Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S.
newspapers would cause a helpful wave of
national indignation." The plans had the
written approval of all of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff and were presented to
President Kennedy's defense secretary,
Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they
apparently were rejected by the civilian
leadership and have gone undisclosed for
nearly 40 years. The Joint Chiefs even
proposed using the potential death of
astronaut John Glenn during the first
attempt to put an American into orbit as
a false pretext for war with Cuba.
Should the rocket explode and kill
Glenn, they wrote, "the objective is to
provide irrevocable proof … that the
fault lies with the Communists." The
scary thing is none of this stuff comes
out until 40 years after.
Note: Why was ABC the
only major news source to report on this
highly revealing story? To read the
shocking declassified documents on
Operation Northwoods,
click here. Many military and
political leaders look at the world as a
chess board. Sacrificing pawns
(innocent civilians) is sometimes
necessary to capture the queen. For
other revealing news articles on
military corruption,
click here. For revealing 9/11 news
articles,
click here.
How much influence do private networks
of the rich and powerful have on
government policies and international
relations? One group, the
Bilderberg, has often attracted
speculation that it forms a shadowy
global government. Every year
since 1954 [they have brought] together
about 120 leading business people and
politicians. At this year's meeting in
Germany, the audience included the heads
of the World Bank and European Central
Bank, Chairmen or Chief Executives from
Nokia, BP, Unilever, DaimlerChrysler and
Pepsi ... editors from five major
newspapers, members of parliament,
ministers, European commissioners ...
and the queen of the Netherlands. The
chairman ... is 73-year-old Viscount
Etienne Davignon. In an extremely rare
interview, he played down the importance
of Bilderberg. "I don't think (we are) a
global ruling class because I don't
think a global ruling class exists."
Will Hutton ... who attended a
Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people
take part in these networks in order to
influence the way the world works, to
create what he calls "the international
common sense". And that "common sense"
is one which supports the interests of
Bilderberg's main participants. For
Bilderberg's critics the fact that there
is almost no publicity about the annual
meetings is proof that they are up to no
good. Bilderberg meetings often
feature future political leaders shortly
before they become household names. Bill
Clinton went in 1991 while still
governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was
there two years later while still an
opposition MP. All the recent
presidents of the European Commission
attended Bilderberg meetings before they
were appointed. Informal and private
networks like Bilderberg have helped to
oil the wheels of global politics and
globalisation for the past half a
century.
Note: Why is this
meeting of top world leaders kept so
secret? Why, until a few years ago, was
there virtually no reporting on this
influential group in the
major media? Thankfully, the
alternative media has had some good
articles. And a
Google search can be highly
informative. For many other revealing
news articles from major media sources
on powerful secret societies,
click here. And for those interested
in exploring reliable information
covering the big picture of how and why
these secret societies are using
government-sponsored mind control
programs to achieve their agenda,
click here.
On Sept. 10 [2001], Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on
foreign terrorists, "the adversary's
closer to home. It's the Pentagon
bureaucracy." He said money wasted by
the military poses a serious threat.
Rumsfeld promised change but the next
day—Sept. 11—the world changed and in
the rush to fund the war on terrorism,
the war on waste seems to have been
forgotten. Just last week President Bush
announced, "my 2003 budget calls for
more than $48 billion in new defense
spending." More money for the Pentagon
... while its own auditors admit the
military cannot account for 25 percent
of what it spends. "According to
some estimates we cannot track $2.3
trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld
admitted. $2.3 trillion—that's $8,000
for every man, woman and child in
America. A former Marine turned
whistle-blower is risking his job by
speaking out ... about the millions he
noticed were missing from one defense
agency's balance sheets. Jim Minnery,
Defense Finance and Accounting Service
... tried to follow the money trail,
even crisscrossing the country looking
for records. "The director looked at me
and said 'Why do you care about this
stuff?' It took me aback. My supervisor
asking me why I care about doing a good
job," said Minnery. He was reassigned
and says officials then covered up the
problem. The Pentagon's Inspector
General "partially substantiated"
several of Minnery's allegations.
Note: To see the CBS
video clip of this shocking admission,
click here. For another key clip,
click here. For other media articles
revealing major corruption,
click here. Even though originally
not reported because of the trauma of
9/11, why wasn't this news broadcast far
and wide later? Why isn't it making
media headlines now? For other revealing
news articles on military corruption,
click here.
Another of the men named by the FBI as a
hijacker in the suicide attacks on
Washington and New York has turned up
alive and well. The identities of four
of the 19 suspects accused of having
carried out the attacks are now in
doubt. Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al
Shehri was one of five men that the FBI
said had deliberately crashed American
Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade
Centre on 11 September. His photograph
was released, and has since appeared in
newspapers and on television around the
world. He told journalists there that he
had nothing to do with the attacks. He
has contacted both the Saudi and
American authorities. He
acknowledges that he attended flight
training school at Daytona Beach in the
United States, and is indeed the same
Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has
been referring. But, he says, he left
the United States in September last year
[and] became a pilot with Saudi Arabian
airlines. Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of
the Flight 11 hijack suspects ... says
he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms,
and that he lost his passport while
studying in Denver. Meanwhile ... a
London-based Arabic daily says it has
interviewed Saeed Alghamdi. He was
listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the
United flight that crashed in
Pennsylvania. And there are suggestions
that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar,
may also be alive. FBI Director Robert
Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that
the identity of several of the suicide
hijackers is in doubt.
Note: The deceptions in
the official story of 9/11 are nowhere
more clearly shown than in this
important story. The FBI never revised
its list of alleged hijackers, and these
four are all later listed in the
official 9/11 Commission report as the
hijackers.
Click here and scroll down a little
over half way to see their photos in the
official report. For more on this,
click here. For an abundance of
reliable information suggesting a major
9/11 cover-up,
click here. For other revealing news
articles on 9/11,
click here.
Findings of the Select Committee on
Assassinations in the Assassination of
President John F. Kennedy in Dallas,
Tex., November 22, 1963. Scientific
acoustical evidence establishes a high
probability that two gunmen fired at
President John F. Kennedy. Other
scientific evidence does not preclude
the possibility of two gunmen firing at
the President. The committee
believes, on the basis of the evidence
available to it, that President John F.
Kennedy was probably assassinated as a
result of a conspiracy. The
committee is unable to identify the
other gunman or the extent of the
conspiracy. The [original] investigation
into the possibility of conspiracy in
the assassination was inadequate. The
conclusions of the investigations were
arrived at in good faith, but presented
in a fashion that was too definitive.
The Department of Justice failed to
exercise initiative in supervising and
directing the investigation by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation of the
assassination. The Federal
Bureau of Investigation failed to
investigate adequately the possibility
of a conspiracy to assassinate the
President. The Central Intelligence
Agency was deficient in its collection
and sharing of information both
prior to and subsequent to the
assassination. The Warren Commission
failed to investigate adequately the
possibility of a conspiracy to
assassinate the President.
Note: This same
US Congressional report, on the
subject of the Martin Luther King, Jr.
assassination, states that "The
committee believes, on the basis of the
circumstantial evidence available to it,
that there is a likelihood that James
Earl Ray assassinated Dr. Martin Luther
King as
a result of a conspiracy." Why
hasn't this information been widely
reported and become public knowledge?
For a possible answer,
click here. For other revealing news
articles on assassinations,
click here.
Researchers from the Argonne National
Laboratory in Illinois have developed a
hack that, for about $26 and an
8th-grade science education, can
remotely manipulate the electronic
voting machines used by millions of
voters all across the U.S. The
researchers ... performed their
proof-of-concept hack on a Diebold
Accuvote TS electronic voting machine, a
type of touchscreen Direct Recording
Electronic (DRE) voting system that is
widely used for government elections.
Diebold's voting-machine business is now
owned by the Denver-based Dominion
Voting Systems, whose e-voting machines
are used in about 22 states. Roger
Johnston and Jon Warner from Argonne
National Laboratory's Vulnerability
Assessment Team demonstrate three
different ways an attacker could tamper
with, and remotely take full control, of
the e-voting machine simply by attaching
what they call a piece of "alien
electronics" into the machine's circuit
board. The electronic hacking
tool consists of a $1.29 microprocessor
and a circuit board that costs about $8.
Together with the $15 remote control,
which enabled the researchers to modify
votes from up to a half-mile away, the
whole hack runs about $26.
Note: Why isn't this
making news headlines? For more on this
critical development,
click here. For many other news
articles on serious problems with
elections,
click here.
The U.S. government's official line may
be that unidentified flying objects
(UFOs) don't pose a national security
threat, but a group of former Air Force
officers gathered Monday in the nation's
capital to tell a different story.
During a press conference at the
National Press Club in Washington, D.C.,
seven former Air Force officers once
stationed at nuclear bases around the
country said that not only have UFOs
visited Air Force bases, some have
succeeded in disabling nuclear missiles
stationed there. "I want the government
to acknowledge that this phenomenon
exists," said
Robert Salas, a former U.S. Air
Force Nuclear Launch Officer.
Salas said he doesn't think the UFOs he
claims to have encountered had any
offensive intent, but he believes they
wanted to leave an impression."They wanted to shine a light on
our nuclear weapons and just send us a
message," he said. "My interpretation is
the message is get rid of them because
it's going to mean our destruction."
Other former officers recounted similar
stories of unexplained moving lights and
odd-shaped flying objects during their
time in the service. Leslie Kean, an
investigative journalist and author of
the new book "UFOs:
Generals, Pilots, and Government
Officials Go on the Record," said
thousands of pages of documentation
support the officers' accounts. She
spent the last 10 years researching UFOs
and combing through thousands of pages
of declassified government material.
Kean said that one declassified document
that she researched for her book,
relating to the Salas incident, said,
"the fact that no apparent reason for
the loss of the 10 missiles can easily
be identified is a cause for grave
concern to this headquarters."
Note: To watch
18-minutes of this most fascinating
testimony on the CNN website,
click here. This is not the first
time government and military witnesses
have testified at the National Press
Club about a major cover-up of UFOs. To
watch 22 witnesses testifying to
remarkable personal stories in May 2001,
click here. For a two-page written
summary of amazing UFO testimony from
top officials,
click here. For more fascinating
news articles on UFOs,
click here.
Some of the world's biggest, most
profitable corporations enjoy a far
lower tax rate than you do--that is, if
they pay taxes at all. The most
egregious example is General Electric.
Last year the conglomerate generated
$10.3 billion in pretax income, but
ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In
fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1
billion. How did this happen? It's
complicated. GE in effect consists of
two divisions: General Electric Capital
and everything else. The everything
else--maker of engines, power plants, TV
shows and the like--would have paid a
22% tax rate if it was a standalone
company. It's GE Capital that keeps the
overall tax bill so low. Over the last
two years, GE Capital has
displayed an uncanny ability to lose
lots of money in the U.S. (posting a
$6.5 billion loss in 2009), and make
lots of money overseas (a $4.3 billion
gain). Not only do the U.S. losses
balance out the overseas gains, but GE
can defer taxes on that overseas income
indefinitely. It's the tax
benefit of overseas operations that is
the biggest reason why multinationals
end up with lower tax rates than the
rest of us.
Note: Can you believe
that GE not only pays no taxes, they
actually get credit from the US
government? They ship US jobs overseas
and then reap huge tax benefits as a
result. What's wrong with this picture?
For a wealth of media news articles on
the hidden manipulations of major
financial corporations,
click here.
Imagine being able to convert water into
a boundless source of cheap energy.
That's what BlackLight Power, a
25-employee firm in Cranbury, N.J., says
it can do. The only problem: Most
scientists say that company's technology
violates the basic laws of physics. Such
skepticism doesn't daunt Dr. Randell
Mills, a Harvard-trained physician and
founder of BlackLight, who recently
claimed that he has created a working
fuel cell using the world's most
pervasive element: the hydrogen found in
water. Mills says he has a market-ready
product: a fuel cell that produces a
chemical reaction to alter hydrogen
atoms. The fuel cell releases heat that
turns water into steam, which drives
electric turbines. The working models in
his lab generate 50 kilowatts of
electricity - enough to power six or
seven houses. But these, Mills says, can
be scaled [up] to drive a large,
electric power plant. The
inventor claims this electricity will
cost less than 2 cents per
kilowatt-hour, which compares to a
national average of 8.9 cents.
Mills developed the patented cocktail
that enables the reaction - a solid fuel
made of hydrogen and a sodium hydride
catalyst - only a year ago. (He recently
posted instructions on the company's Web
site,
blacklightpower.com). Now that the
device is ready for commercialization,
he says, BlackLight is negotiating with
several utilities and architecture and
engineering firms. The business,
Mills says, has attracted $60 million in
funding from wealthy individuals,
investment firms ... and it is no longer
seeking money. BlackLight's
board of directors reads like a Who's
Who of finance and energy leaders.
Note: For two New
York Times articles showing the
viability of this amazing technology,
click here and
here. For many other exciting major
media news articles on new energy
inventions,
click here.
For more than 50 years, the National
Prayer Breakfast has been a Washington
institution. Every president has
attended the breakfast since Eisenhower.
Besides the presidents ... the one
constant presence at the National Prayer
Breakfast has been Douglas Coe. Although
he’s not an ordained minister, the
79-year-old Coe is the most important
religious leader you've never seen or
heard. Scores of senators in
both parties ... go to small weekly
Senate prayer groups that Coe attends,
[including] senators John McCain, Barack
Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Observers who have investigated Coe’s
group, called The Fellowship Foundation,
[describe] a secretive organization.
Coe repeatedly urges a personal
commitment to Jesus Christ. It’s a
commitment Coe compares to the blind
devotion that Adolph Hitler demanded.
"Hitler, Goebbels and Himmler. Think of
the immense power these three men had.”
Coe also quoted Jesus and said: “One of
the things [Jesus] said is 'If any man
comes to me and does not hate his
father, mother, brother, sister, his own
life, he can't be a disciple.’" Writer
Jeff Sharlet ... lived among Coe's
followers six years ago, and came out
troubled by their secrecy and rhetoric.
“We were being taught the leadership
lessons of Hitler, Lenin and Mao.
Hitler’s genocide wasn’t really an issue
for them. It was the strength that he
emulated,” said Sharlet, who ... has now
written about The Fellowship, also known
to insiders as The Family, in [a] book
called
The Family: The Secret
Fundamentalism at the Heart of American
Power.
Note: This article
strangely has been removed from the
MSNBC website, though you can still
access it using the
Internet Archive. Watch the
incredible four-minute NBC video clip
showing Coe praising a communist Red
Guard member for cutting the head off
his mother at
this link. For more on Coe's
powerful links to Congress and
corruption, see the MSNBC article
available here. And for powerful
inside information from a mind
programmer who claims to have escaped
from "the family," and another who says
he is from a very high level there,
click here and
here. To develop an understanding of
the bigger picture behind all of this,
click here.
There are no magic bullets in the fight
against cancer: that's the first thing
every responsible scientist mentions
when discussing a possible new
treatment, no matter how promising. If
there were a magic bullet, though, it
might be something like dichloroacetate,
or DCA, a drug that kills cancer cells
by exploiting a fundamental weakness
found in a wide range of solid tumors.
So far, though, it kills them just in
test tubes and in rats infected with
human cancer cells; it has never been
tested against cancer in living human
beings. DCA ... is an existing drug
whose side effects are well-studied and
relatively tolerable. Also, it's a small
molecule that might be able to cross the
blood-brain barrier to reach otherwise
intractable brain tumors. Within days
after a technical paper on DCA appeared
in the journal Cancer Cell last week,
the lead author, Dr. Evangelos
Michelakis of the University of Alberta,
was deluged with calls and e-mails from
prospective patients—to whom he can say
only, “Hang in there.” DCA is a
remarkably simple molecule. It acts in
the body to promote the activity of the
mitochondria. Researchers have assumed
that the mitochondria in cancer cells
were irreparably damaged. But Michelakis
wondered if that was really true. With
his colleagues he used DCA to turn back
on the mitochondria in cancer
cells—which promptly died. One
of the great things about DCA is that
it's a simple compound, in the public
domain, and could be produced for
pennies a dose. But that's also a
problem, because big drug companies are
unlikely to spend a billion dollars or
so on large-scale clinical trials for a
compound they can't patent. (Anyone
interested in helping can click here)
Note: For a 2010
follow-up by Dr. Michelakis with
promising results,
click here and watch a 10-minute
video at
this link. For the DCA website,
click here. Thank you Newsweek
for this important article. Why haven't
any
other mass media reported this major
story? Why aren't many millions of
dollars being poured into research?
Notice even Newsweek
acknowledges the drug companies are not
interested in finding a cure for cancer
if they can't make a profit from it.
Some suspect the drug companies have
even suppressed cancer cures found in
the past. For one amazing example of
this,
click here. More on DCA
available here.
The man behind the latest YouTube
sensation has spoken out for the first
time about his global cuddling
controversy. Serial hugger Juan Mann
describes the free hugs he hands
out...as fast-food emotion. His cuddling
campaign received an international dose
of publicity today, after
a clip showing his public displays
of affection won a coveted front page
spot on the video sharing website. An
American television audience of millions
also watched him at work, when the video
was broadcast on the prime-time
breakfast program Good Morning America
yesterday. Today, the hugger was at it
again, brandishing his "free hugs" sign
in the busy pedestrian thoroughfare, and
having quite a few people take him up on
his offer. "It's a way to make people
smile," Mann said. "For every person who
gets a hug, you see five walk past with
a smile on their face." But his efforts
to spread the love became a little too
popular for some people's liking,
according to a blurb on the YouTube
video, which said: "As this
symbol of human hope spread across the
city, police and officials ordered the
Free Hugs campaign BANNED." Undeterred,
Mann collected more than 10,000
signatures on a petition he presented to
the City of Sydney council.
Demands for a halt to the hugs petered
out shortly after, and the end of the
clip shows Mann hugging an official.
City worker Elly Mitchell, who handed
out a few free hugs on her lunch break
today, said she was inspired to organise
[an] event after seeing the video
online. "We're going to hug the city,"
Ms Mitchell said.
Note: If you haven't
seen this powerfully inspiring
four-minute video clip, join the over 10
million who have by
clicking here. The free hugs
movement is rapidly spreading around the
world! Click
here and
here to see more. For several other
short, deeply inspiring videos,
click here.
A newly declassified document gives a
fascinating glimpse into the US
military's plans for "information
operations". The declassified document
is called "Information Operations
Roadmap". It was obtained by the
National Security Archive at George
Washington University using the Freedom
of Information Act. Officials in the
Pentagon wrote it in 2003. The Secretary
of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, signed it.
The operations described in the document
include a surprising range of military
activities: public affairs officers who
brief journalists, psychological
operations troops who try to manipulate
the thoughts and beliefs of an enemy,
computer network attack specialists who
seek to destroy enemy networks. The
military's psychological operations, or
Psyops, is finding its way onto the
computer and television screens of
ordinary Americans. "Psyops messages
will often be replayed by the news media
for much larger audiences, including the
American public. Strategy should be
based on the premise that the Department
[of Defense] will 'fight the net' as it
would an enemy weapons system," it
reads. The document recommends that the
United States should seek the ability to
"provide maximum control of the entire
electromagnetic spectrum". US
forces should be able to "disrupt or
destroy the full spectrum of globally
emerging communications systems,
sensors, and weapons systems dependent
on the electromagnetic spectrum".
The fact that the "Information
Operations Roadmap" is approved by the
Secretary of Defense suggests that these
plans are taken very seriously indeed in
the Pentagon.
Note: For other
revealing news articles on military
corruption,
click here. For other revealing news
articles on government corruption,
click here.
Pres. Bush and John Kerry were
both members of the secret organization.
‘Skull and Bones’ dates to
1832. It was in fact a reaction to a
secret society, the Masons. Founder
William Huntington Russell thought of
his little enclave as sort of
anti-Masons and as a home for the
wealthy and the powerful ... who would
do anything for another Bonesman. Each
year, 15 young undergraduate seniors are
tapped for membership. Members of ‘Skull
and Bones’ gather on High Street in the
Yale campus at the tomb. New members,
the neophytes, are expected to do things
like lie in coffins, wrestle in mud,
kiss a skull, and confess their sexual
histories in front of the group to bond
themselves together. Once you‘re in,
you‘re in: ‘Skull and Bones’ is for
life. There are a lot of [famous]
Bonesmen ... Henry Luce, who created
“TIME” magazine; Harold Stanley, founder
of Morgan Stanley; William F. Buckley;
Averell Harriman, long-time governor of
New York. And then there are the
presidents: William Howard Taft, whose
father, Alphonso, had helped found the
group; George Herbert Walker Bush, whose
father, Prescott, was a Bonesman and a
senator; the current President Bush.
[And there's] John Kerry, Bonesman class
of ‘66. His wife Teresa Kerry‘s first
husband, John Heinz ... was ‘Skull and
Bones.’ Both Bush and Kerry refused to
answer ‘Meet the Press’ host Tim Russert
when asked about the organization.
Alexandra Robbins, author of “Secrets of
the Tombs" [said] "The sole purpose of
Skull and Bones is to get members into
positions of power and then to have
those members hire other members to
prominent positions, which is something
that President Bush has done."
Note: For a highly
revealing, four-minute CNN News clip on
Skull and Bones,
click here. For other major media
video clips reporting on this powerful
secret society,
click here. Many have claimed that
secret societies have not had much
influence on world politics. This
article and videos raises many serious
questions about this. For those
interested in exploring reliable
information covering the big picture of
how and why these secret societies are
using government-sponsored mind control
programs to achieve their agenda,
click here. And for other revealing
media news articles on powerful secret
societies,
click here.
U.S. military sources have given the FBI
information that suggests five of the
alleged hijackers of the planes that
were used in [the 9/11] terror attacks
received training at secure U.S.
military installations in the 1990s.
Three of the alleged hijackers
listed their address on drivers licenses
and car registrations as the Naval Air
Station in Pensacola, Fla. -- known as
the "Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation,"
according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy
source. Another of the alleged hijackers
may have been trained in strategy and
tactics at the Air War College in
Montgomery, Ala., said another
high-ranking Pentagon official. The
fifth man may have received language
instruction at Lackland Air Force Base
in San Antonio, Tex. Both were former
Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to
the United States, according to the
Pentagon source. The five men were on a
list of 19 people identified as
hijackers by the FBI on [September 14].
The three foreign nationals training in
Pensacola appear to be Saeed Alghamdi
and Ahmad Alnami, who were among the
four men who allegedly commandeered
United Airlines Flight 93. That flight
[ended in] rural Pennsylvania. The third
man who may have trained in Pensacola,
Ahmed Alghamdi, allegedly helped
highjack United Airlines Flight 75,
which hit the south tower of the World
Trade Center. Military records show that
the three used as their address 10
Radford Boulevard, a base roadway on
which residences for foreign-military
flight trainees are located.
Note: For more on this
vitally important news, see the
Washington Post news article
available here and the Los
Angeles Times news article
here. Several of the alleged
hijackers also contacted US media
shortly after 9/11 to report that they
were alive and were not on the hijacked
planes. See the
BBC News and
Times of London news
articles on this. Yet the 9/11
Commission Report lists these men
as the official hijackers at
this link. So what's really going on
here? For many other major media news
articles suggesting that rogue elements
of government were involved in 9/11,
click here. For our reliable 9/11
Information Center,
click here.
"Gentlemen! We have called you together
to inform you that we are going to
overthrow the United States government."
So begins a statement being delivered by
Gen. Carl W. Steiner. At least the voice
sounds amazingly like him. But it is not
Steiner. It is the result of voice
"morphing" technology developed at the
Los Alamos National Laboratory in New
Mexico. Psychological operations ...
PSYOPS, as the military calls it,
seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in
enemy governments, militaries and
populations to pursue national and
battlefield objectives. Covert operators
kicked around the idea of creating a
computer-faked videotape of Saddam
Hussein crying or showing other such
manly weaknesses, or in some sexually
compromising situation. The nascent plan
was for the tapes to be flooded into
Iraq and the Arab world. The tape war
never proceeded ... but the "strategic"
PSYOPS scheming didn't die. What
if the U.S. projected a holographic
image of Allah floating over Baghdad
urging the Iraqi people and Army to rise
up against Saddam? According to a
military physicist given the task of
looking into the hologram idea, the
feasibility had been established of
projecting large, three-dimensional
objects that appeared to float in the
air. A super secret program was
established in 1994 to pursue the very
technology for PSYOPS application. The
"Holographic Projector" is described in
a classified Air Force document as a
system to "project information power
from space ... for special operations
deception missions."
Note: If the above link fails,
click here. If you want to
understand some of the many hidden
capabilities of the U.S. military, this
article is a must read. For other
revealing news articles on the use of
these "nonlethal" weapons,
click here.
The Central Intelligence Agency
conducted a 14-year program to find ways
to "control human behavior" through the
use of chemical, biological and
radiological material,
according to agency documents made
public today by John Marks. The
documents ... suggested broader
experimentation on unwitting humans by
the intelligence agency or its paid
researchers than had been publicly known
before. Mr. Marks distributed
20 documents that described the
following incidents, among others: In
1956, the C.I.A. contracted with a
private physician to test
"bulbocapnine," a drug that can cause
stupor or induce a catatonic state, on
monkeys and "convicts incarcerated at"
an unnamed state penitentiary. A letter
from an unnamed C.I.A. official in 1949
discussed ways of killing people without
leaving a trace. "I believe that there
are two chemical substances which would
be most useful in that they would leave
no characteristic pathological
findings," the letter said. In 1952, two
Russian agents who were "suspected of
being doubled" were interrogated using
"narcohypnotic" methods. The two men
were given sodium pentothal and a
stimulant. One interrogation produced a
"remarkable" regression, the papers
said, during which "the subject actually
relived certain past activities of his
life. The subject totally accepted Mr.
[name deleted] as an old and trusted and
beloved personal friend whom the subject
had known in years past in Georgia,
U.S.S.R." The C.I.A. conducted secret
medical experiments from 1949 through
1963 under the code names Bluebird,
Artichoke, MK Ultra and MK Delta.
Note: If the above link
fails,
click here. For a one-minute video
clip showing Congressional testimony on
a dart gun which causes a heart attack
without leaving any evidence,
click here. For lots more reliable,
verifiable information suggesting a
major cover-up of government mind
control programs,
click here. For other revealing news
articles on mind control,
click here.
A posthypnotic of the night before
(pointed finger, you will sleep) was
enacted. Misses [deleted] and [deleted]
immediately progressed to a deep
hypnotic state with no further
suggestion. Miss [deleted] was then
instructed (having previously expressed
a fear of firearms in any fashion) that
she would use every method at her
disposal to awaken Miss [deleted] (now
in a deep hypnotic sleep) and failing
this, she would pick up a pistol nearby
and fire it at Miss [deleted]. She was
instructed that her rage would be so
great that she would not hesitate to
“kill” [deleted] for failing to awaken.
Miss [deleted] carried out these
suggestions to the letter including
firing the (unloaded) gun at [deleted]
and then proceeding to fall into a deep
sleep.
Both were awakened and
expressed complete amnesia for the
entire sequence. Miss [deleted] was
again handed the gun, which she refused
(in an awakened state) to pick up or
accept from the operator. She expressed
absolute denial that the foregoing
sequence had happened.
Note: This text is
quoted from page 1 of declassified CIA
document MORI ID 190691. To verify the
statement in the text, make a FOIA
(Freedom of Information Act) request as
described here, or directly view a
scanned copy
online here. To access thousands of
pages of declassified CIA mind control
documents online,
click here. For lots more reliable
information on this crucial topic,
click here. For many revealing news
articles on mind control,
click here.
The Pentagon porn story began in 2006.
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement
[ICE] child pornography sting operation
called Project Flicker produced payment
records of about 5,200 people, many of
whom provided Army or fleet zip codes or
military e-mail addresses. Subsequently,
the Pentagon's investigative branch,
DCIS, began going through the ICE list
to identify who actually was a DOD
employee. The investigation, however,
only ran for eight months, and only
cross-checked some 3,500 names for
Pentagon ties. According to DCIS
documents revealed in a Freedom of
Information Act request, out of that
3,500, investigators uncovered 264
employees or contractors, including
staffers for the secretary of defense.
Nine people had top security clearances.
But only about 20 percent of
those 264 people were completely
investigated. Fewer still were
prosecuted. After about eight months,
the entire probe was halted. It
left about 1,700 names totally
unchecked, 1,700 alleged kiddie porn
customers, an unknown number of whom may
still work in some capacity for the
Defense Department. Late last summer,
after investigations by "The
Boston Globe" and
Yahoo! News revealed the figures, a
Pentagon spokesman promised to reopen
the investigation, conceding that DCIS
had stopped due to lack of resources.
DCIS says it is now revisiting all 5,200
names. They have now identified 302
employees or staffers.
[Yet] of
the 302 people confirmed as DOD
personnel or contractors, only 70 of
them were actually investigated.
Note: To see the CNN
video clip of this important news,
click here. Isn't it interesting
that the Pentagon, with it's huge
budget, claims the investigation was
stopped due to "lack of resources." If
you are ready to see how investigations
into a massive child sex abuse ring have
led to the highest levels of government,
watch the suppressed Discovery Channel
documentary "Conspiracy of Silence,"
available here.
There he was, five decades later, the
priest who had raped Joe Callander in
Massachusetts. The photo in the Roman
Catholic newsletter showed him with a
smile across his wrinkled face,
near-naked Amazon Indian children in his
arms and at his feet. The Rev. Mario
Pezzotti was working with children and
supervising other priests in Brazil.
It's not an isolated example. In an
investigation spanning 21 countries
across six continents, The Associated
Press found 30 cases of priests accused
of abuse who were transferred or moved
abroad. Some escaped police
investigations. Many had access to
children in another country, and some
abused again. A priest who admitted to
abuse in Los Angeles went to the
Philippines, where U.S. church officials
mailed him checks and advised him not to
reveal their source. A priest in Canada
was convicted of sexual abuse and then
moved to France, where he was convicted
of abuse again in 2005. Another priest
was moved back and forth between Ireland
and England, despite being diagnosed as
a pederast, a man who commits sodomy
with boys. "The pattern is if a
priest gets into trouble and it's close
to becoming a scandal or if the law
might get involved, they send them to
the missions abroad," said
Richard Sipe, a former Benedictine monk
and critic of what he says is a practice
of international transfers of accused
and admitted priest child abusers.
"Anything to avoid a scandal."
Note: This is only the
tip of the iceberg. If you want to
understand how pedophile rings have
infiltrated the highest levels of
government, don't miss the powerful
Discovery Channel documentary on this
available here.
To join the 12,288 informed and caring subscribers to this list (two
emails/week) Subscribe here
The Mission of WantToKnow.info: To
provide our readers with reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups,
and to serve as a call to work together for the good of all
Kindly support this important work. We're
$2,400 in the red. Click here
to make a donation.
Join in the engaging conversations on our Readers Forum at
this link Click here
to learn about volunteering for this great cause (donations-in-kind)
"At a moment when the world was falling into darkness, Kennedy did
what from his generals' standpoint was intolerable and unforgivable. JFK not
only rejected his generals' pressures for war. Even worse, the president then
reached out to their enemy, asking for help. That was treason."
~~ Author James Douglass giving a key reason for the Kennedy assassination
Dear friends,
On the 50th anniversary of the John F. Kennedy assassination, countless theories
attempt to explain this tragic event. Yet few have taken the painstaking efforts
needed to carefully document all of the facts related to the many steps taken by
Kennedy which greatly upset the establishment in the lead-up to his
assassination. Author James Douglass has now done that in his highly acclaimed
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters. This may be
the most definitive book ever on the many facts and theories surrounding the
Kennedy assassination.
The below concise summary of the painstaking work by Douglass both captivates
and inspires. With references and links to verify his statements,
Douglass presents numerous revealing facts and powerful evidence that John F.
Kennedy took far too many steps towards peace and away from the
secret
agendas of his war-hungry generals and rich industrialists. His
behavior simply could not be tolerated by those who stood to loose billions of
dollars from his ever-growing resolve to create more peace in our world.
Yet despite some of the disturbing facts presented, Douglass leaves us with
great hope. As he states, the life and death of John F. Kennedy "is not so much
a story of one man as it is a story of peacemaking when the chips are down. That
story is our story, a story of hope." If each of us is inspired
to stand up and do the right thing, the whole world will change for the better.
For how you can play your part, see the "What you can do"
section at the end of this excellent essay.
Confronting the
John F. Kennedy Assassination Where Do We Find Hope When A Peacemaking President Is Assassinated? By James W. Douglass, author of acclaimed book
JFK and the Unspeakable
I believe this experiment we are doing into the dark truth of
Dallas (and of Washington, D.C.) can be the most hopeful experience of our
lives. But, it does require patience and tenacity to confront the unspeakable.
We, first of all, need to take the time to recognize the sources in our history
for what happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963.
'Plausible deniability'
The doctrine of "plausible deniability" in an old government document provides
us with a source of the assassination of President Kennedy. The document was
issued in 1948, one year after the CIA was established, and 15 years before
JFK's murder. That document, National Security Council directive 10/2, on June
18, 1948, "gave the highest sanction of the [U.S.] government to a broad range
of covert operations" — propaganda, sabotage, economic warfare, subversion of
all kinds — that were seen as necessary to "win" the Cold War against the
Communists. [1]
In the 1950s, under the leadership of CIA Director Allen Dulles, the
doctrine of "plausible deniability" became the CIA's green light to
assassinate national leaders, conduct secret military operations, and
overthrow governments that our government thought were on the wrong
side in the Cold War. "Plausible deniability" meant our intelligence agencies,
acting as paramilitary groups, had to lie and cover their tracks so effectively
that there would be no trace of U.S. government responsibility for criminal
activities on an ever-widening scale.
Truman warns about the CIA
The man who proposed this secret, subversive process in 1948, diplomat
George Kennan, said later, in light of its consequences, that it was "the
greatest mistake I ever made." [2] President Harry Truman, under whom
the CIA was created, and during whose presidency the plausible deniability
doctrine was authorized, had deep regrets. He said in a statement on December
22, 1963:
"We have grown up as a nation, respected for our free institutions and for our
ability to maintain a free and open society. There is something about the way
the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position
and I feel that we need to correct it." [3]
Truman later remarked: "The CIA was set up by me for the sole purpose of
getting all the available information to the president. It was not intended to
operate as an international agency engaged in strange activities." [4]
One assumption behind Kennan's proposal unleashing the CIA for its war against
Communism was that the Agency's criminal power could be confined to covert
action outside the borders of the United States, with immunity from its lethal
power granted to U.S. citizens. That assumption proved to be wrong.
During the Cold War, the hidden growth of the CIA's autonomous power
corresponded to the public growth of what was called a fortress state. A
democratic national security state is a contradiction in terms.
The insecure basis of our security then became weapons that could destroy the
planet. To protect the security of that illusory means of security, which was
absolute destructive power, we now needed a ruling elite of national security
managers with an authority above that of our elected representatives.
So from that point on, our military-industrial managers made the real decisions
of state. President Truman simply ratified their decisions and entrenched their
power, as he did with the establishment of the CIA, and as his National Security
Council did with its endorsement of plausible deniability.
Kennedy sacks CIA leaders
We know how JFK reacted to the CIA's setting him up. He was furious.
When the enormity of the Bay of Pigs disaster came home to him, he said he
wanted "to splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds."
[5]
He ordered an investigation into the whole affair, under the very watchful eyes
of his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy. He fired CIA Director Allen
Dulles, Deputy Director Richard Bissell, Jr., and Deputy Director General
Charles Cabell. That was a huge decision — firing the top of the CIA's
hierarchy, including the legendary leader who had come to personify the agency,
Allen Dulles.
The president then took steps "to cut the CIA budget in 1962 and again in 1963,
aiming at a 20 percent reduction by 1966." [6] He was cutting back the CIA's
power in very concrete ways, step by step.
JFK alienates CIA and Pentagon
JFK had to confront the unspeakable in the Missile Crisis in the form of
total nuclear war. At the height of that terrifying conflict, he felt the
situation spiraling out of control, especially because of the actions of his
generals.
The White House tapes show Kennedy questioning and resisting the
mounting pressure to bomb Cuba coming from both the Joint Chiefs and the
Executive Committee of the National Security Council. At the same time, John
Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev, the two men most responsible for the Cuban
Missile Crisis, seemed locked in a hopeless ideological conflict. The U.S. and
Soviet leaders had been following Cold War policies that now seemed to be moving
inexorably toward a war of extermination.
Kennedy and Khrushchev: Two enemies become peacemakers
Yet, as we have since learned, Kennedy and Khrushchev had been engaged in a
secret correspondence for over a year that gave signs of hope. Even as they
moved publicly step by step toward a Cold War climax that would almost take the
world over the edge with them, they were at the same time smuggling confidential
letters back and forth that recognized each other's humanity and hoped for a
solution. They were public enemies who, in the midst of deepening turmoil, were
secretly learning something approaching trust in each other.
On what seemed the darkest day in the crisis, when a Soviet missile had shot
down a U2 spy plane over Cuba, intensifying the already overwhelming pressures
on Kennedy to bomb Cuba, the president sent his brother, Attorney General Robert
Kennedy, secretly to Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin. RFK told Dobrynin, as
Dobrynin reported to Khrushchev, that the president "didn't know how to resolve
the situation. The military is putting great pressure on him... Even if he
doesn't want or desire a war, something irreversible could occur against his
will. That is why the President is asking for help to solve this problem." [6]
In his memoirs, Khrushchev recalled a further, chilling sentence from Robert
Kennedy's appeal to Dobrynin: "If the situation continues much longer, the
President is not sure that the military will not overthrow him and seize power."
[7]
At a moment when the world was falling into darkness, Kennedy did what
from his generals' standpoint was intolerable and unforgivable. JFK not only
rejected his generals' pressures for war. Even worse, the president then reached
out to their enemy, asking for help. That was treason.
When Nikita Khrushchev had received Kennedy's plea for help in Moscow, he turned
to his Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko and said, "We have to let Kennedy know
that we want to help him."
Khrushchev stunned himself by what he had just said: Did he really want to help
his enemy, Kennedy? Yes, he did. He repeated the word to his foreign minister:
"Yes, help. We now have a common cause, to save the world from those pushing us
toward war." [8]
How do we understand that moment? The two most heavily armed leaders in history,
on the verge of total nuclear war, suddenly joined hands against those on both
sides pressuring them to attack. Khrushchev ordered the immediate withdrawal of
his missiles from Cuba, in return for Kennedy's public pledge never to invade
Cuba and his secret promise to withdraw U.S. missiles from Turkey — as he would
in fact do.
When President Kennedy stood up to the Pentagon, the CIA, and the
military-industrial complex, he was treated as a traitor. His attempt to save
the planet from the weapons of his own nation was regarded as treason. The
doctrine of “plausible deniability” allowed for the assassination of a president
seen as a national security risk himself.
Committing heresy for peace
At American University on June 10, 1963, President Kennedy proposed an end to
the Cold War. Kennedy's rejection of "a Pax Americana" was an act of resistance
to the military-industrial complex. The military-industrial complex was totally
dependent on "a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war."
[9]
That Pax Americana policed by the Pentagon was considered the system's
indispensable, hugely profitable means of containing and defeating Communism. At
his own risk, Kennedy was rejecting the foundation of the Cold War system.
Kennedy said he wanted to negotiate a nuclear test ban treaty with the Soviet
Union in Moscow — in their capitol, not ours — as soon as possible. To clear the
way for such a treaty, he said he was suspending U.S. atmospheric tests
unilaterally.
Kennedy's strategy of peace penetrated the Soviet government's defenses
far more effectively than any missile could have done. The Soviet press, which
was accustomed to censoring U.S. government statements, published the entire
speech all across the country. Soviet radio stations broadcast and
rebroadcast the speech to the Soviet people. In response to Kennedy's turn
toward peace, the Soviet government even stopped jamming all Western broadcasts
into their country.
His speech was received less favorably in his own country. The New York
Times reported his government's skepticism: "Generally there was not much
optimism in official Washington that the President's conciliation address at
American University would produce agreement on a test ban treaty or anything
else." [10]
In contrast to the Soviet media that were electrified by the speech, the U.S.
media ignored or downplayed it. For the first time, Americans had less
opportunity to read and hear their president's words than did the Russian
people. A turn-around was occurring in the world on different levels. Whereas
nuclear disarmament had suddenly become feasible, Kennedy's position in his own
government had become precarious.
Nuclear test ban treaty
President Kennedy's next critical conflict with his national security state,
propelling him toward the coup d'etat he saw as possible, was the Partial
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty that he signed with Nikita Khrushchev on July 25, 1963,
six weeks after the American University Address. The president had done
an end run around the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He negotiated the Test Ban Treaty
without consulting them, because they opposed it.
On September 20, Kennedy spoke to the United Nations. He suggested that its
members see the Test Ban Treaty as a beginning and engage together in an
experiment in peace:
"Two years ago I told this body that the United States had proposed, and was
willing to sign, a Limited Test Ban treaty. Today that treaty has been signed.
It will not put an end to war. It will not remove basic conflicts. It will not
secure freedom for all. But it can be a lever, and Archimedes, in explaining the
principles of the lever, was said to have declared to his friends: 'Give me a
place where I can stand — and I shall move the world.'" [11]
JFK reaches out to Cuba
In the month leading up to the assassination, Kennedy and Castro actually began
a dialogue on normalizing U.S.-Cuban relations, through the mediation of French
journalist Jean Daniel who personally visited both men. Daniel was actually
eating lunch with Castro in his home on November 22, conveying Kennedy's hopeful
words, when the Cuban premier was phoned with the news of Kennedy's death.
Castro's somber comment to Daniel was: "Everything is changed. Everything is
going to change." [12]
JFK's top-secret order to begin withdrawal from Vietnam
Kennedy decided on his policy of withdrawal from Vietnam, against the
arguments of most of his advisers, at a contentious National Security Council
meeting on October 2. When Defense Secretary Robert McNamara was
leaving the meeting to announce the withdrawal to the White House reporters,
"the President called to him, 'And tell them that means all of the helicopter
pilots, too.'" [13]
In fact, it would not mean that at all. After JFK's assassination, his
withdrawal policy was quietly voided. In light of the future consequences of
Dallas, it was not only John Kennedy who was murdered on November 22, 1963, but
58,000 other Americans and over three million Vietnamese, Laotians, and
Cambodians.
The Steel Crisis
In a head-on confrontation with the ruling elite of Big Steel, JFK
ordered the Defense Department to switch huge military contracts away from the
major steel companies to the smaller, more loyal contractors that had not defied
him. After the big steel companies bitterly backed down from their price raises,
JFK and his brother, Robert, were denounced as symbols of "ruthless power" by
the Wall Street power brokers at the center of the military-industrial complex.
In an editorial titled, "Steel: The Ides of April" (the month in which Kennedy
faced down the steel executives), Henry Luce's Fortune magazine called
to readers' minds the soothsayer's warning in Shakespeare of the assassination
of Julius Caesar. Fortune was warning Kennedy that his actions had
confirmed the worst fears of corporate America about his presidency, and would
have dire consequences. As interpreted by the most powerful people in the
nation, the steel crisis was a logical prelude to Dallas. It was another Bay of
Pigs.
JFK reaches out to third world
Yet another Bay of Pigs was Kennedy's diplomatic opening to the fiery
Third-World leadership of President Sukarno of Indonesia. Sukarno was "the most
outspoken proponent of Third World neutralism in the Cold War." He had actually
coined the term "Third World." The CIA wanted Sukarno dead. It wanted what it
saw as his pro-communist "global orientation" obliterated. During Eisenhower's
presidency, the CIA repeatedly tried to kill and overthrow Sukarno but failed.
Most significantly, three days before his assassination, President Kennedy said
he was willing to accept Sukarno's invitation to visit Indonesia the following
spring. His visit to Indonesia would have dramatized in a very visible way
Kennedy's support of Third World nationalism, a sea change in U.S. government
policy.
JFK's Indonesian policy was also killed in Dallas, with horrendous consequences.
After Lyndon Johnson became president, the CIA finally succeeded in overthrowing
Sukarno in a massive purge of suspected Communists that ended up killing 500,000
to one million Indonesians.
Kennedy's proposal for a joint U.S.-Soviet moon landing
In his September 20, 1963, speech to the United Nations, JFK once again stated
his hope for a joint expedition to the moon. However, neither American nor
Soviet military leaders, jealous of their rocket secrets, were ready to accept
his initiative. Nikita Khrushchev, siding with his own rocket experts, felt he
was still forced to decline Kennedy's proposal.
That further visionary step to end the Cold War also died with Kennedy. The
United States went to the moon alone. U.S. and Soviet rockets continued to be
pointed at their opposite countries rather than being joined in a project for a
more hopeful future. Sergei Khrushchev said, "I think if Kennedy had lived, we
would be living in a completely different world."
JFK meets the Quakers
In the final weeks of his presidency, President Kennedy took one more risky step
toward peace. It can be seen in relation to a meeting he had the year before
with six Quakers who visited him in his office. Among their challenges to him
was a recommendation that the United States offer its surplus food to the
People's Republic of China. China was considered an enemy nation. Yet it was
also one whose people were beset by a famine.
Kennedy said to the Quakers, "Do you mean you would feed your enemy when he has
his hands on your throat?" [14]
The Quakers said they meant exactly that. They reminded him it was what Jesus
had said should be done. Kennedy said he knew that, and knew that it was the
right thing to do, but he couldn't overcome the China lobby in Washington to
accomplish it.
Nevertheless, a year and a half later in the fall of 1963, against overwhelming
opposition, Kennedy decided to sell wheat to the Russians, who had a severe
grain shortage. His outraged critics said in effect to him what he had said to
the Quakers: Would you feed an enemy who has his hands on your throat?
Vice President Lyndon Johnson said he thought Kennedy's decision to sell
wheat to Russia would turn out to be the worst political mistake he ever made.
Today JFK's controversial decision "to feed the enemy" has been forgotten. In
1963, the wheat sale was seen as a threat to our security — feeding the enemy to
kill us. [For solid evidence Johnson's involvement in the JFK assassination,
see the History Channel documentary
available here.]
The violent reaction to his decision was represented on Friday morning, November
22, 1963, by a threatening, full-page advertisement addressed to him in the
Dallas Morning News. The ad was bordered in black, like a funeral notice.
Among the charges of disloyalty to the nation that the ad made against the
president was the question: "Why have you approved the sale of wheat and corn to
our enemies when you know the Communist soldiers 'travel on their stomach' just
as ours do?"
JFK talks about assassination
JFK read the ad before the flight from Fort Worth to Dallas, pointed it
out to Jacqueline Kennedy, and talked about the possibility of his being
assassinated that day. "But, Jackie," he said, "if somebody wants to shoot me
from a window with a rifle, nobody can stop it, so why worry about it?"
[15]
Peacemaking was now at the top of his agenda as president. That was not the kind
of leadership the CIA, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the military-industrial
complex wanted in the White House. Given the Cold War dogmas that gripped those
dominant powers, and given Kennedy's turn toward peace, his assassination
followed as a matter of course.
So how can the why of his murder give us hope? Where do we find hope when a
peacemaking president is assassinated by his own national security state?
The why of Kennedy’s assassination encircles the earth. Because John Kennedy
chose peace on earth at the height of the Cold War, he was executed. But because
he turned toward peace, in spite of the consequences to himself, humanity is
still alive and struggling. That is hopeful, especially if we understand what he
went through and what he has given to us as his vision.
A profile in courage
The void of the unspeakable is the dark abyss, the midnight reality of
plausible deniability, that we face when we peer into our national security
state's murder of President Kennedy. And that is precisely where hope begins.
At a certain point in his presidency, John Kennedy turned a corner and didn't
look back. I believe that decisive turn toward his final purpose in life,
resulting in his death, happened in the darkness of the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Although Kennedy was already in conflict with his national security managers,
the missile crisis was the breaking point.
At that most critical moment for us all, he turned from any remaining control
his security managers had over him toward a deeper ethic, a deeper vision in
which the fate of the earth became his priority. Without losing sight of our own
best hopes in this country, he began to home in, with his new partner, Nikita
Khrushchev, on the hope of peace for everyone on this earth. He made that
commitment to life at the cost of his own.
What a transforming story that is.
And what a propaganda campaign has been waged to keep us Americans from
understanding that story, from telling it, and from re-telling it to our
children and grandchildren.
Because that's a story whose telling can transform a nation. But when a
nation is under the continuing domination of an idol, namely war, it is a story
that will be covered up. When the story can liberate us from our idolatry of
war, then the worshippers of the idol are going to do everything they can to
keep the story from being told. From the standpoint of a belief that
war is the ultimate power, that's too dangerous a story. It's a subversive
story. It shows a different kind of security than always being ready to go to
war.
It's unbelievable — or we're supposed to think it is — that a president
was murdered by our own government agencies because he was seeking a more stable
peace than relying on nuclear weapons. It's unspeakable.
For the sake of a nation that must always be preparing for war, that story must
not be told. If it were, we might learn that peace is possible without making
war. We might even learn there is a force more powerful than war. How
unthinkable! But how necessary if life on earth is to continue.
That is why it is so hopeful for us to confront the unspeakable and to
tell the transforming story of a man of courage, President John F. Kennedy. It
is a story ultimately not of death, but of life — all our lives. In the end, it
is not so much a story of one man as it is a story of peacemaking when the chips
are down. That story is our story, a story of hope.
Important Note: To purchase the author's highly
acclaimed book JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters,
click here. For a stunning History Channel documentary presenting powerful
evidence that President Lyndon Johnson had a direct hand in the Kennedy
assassination,
click here. For documents on Kennedy stopping his generals from staging a
terror attack in the U.S. and falsely accusing Cuba,
click here. And for lots more reliable facts, videos, and revealing
information on the John F. Kennedy assassination,
click here.
References
[1] Peter Grose, Gentleman Spy: The Life of Allen Dulles (New York:
Houghton Mifflin, 1994), p. 293. [2] New York Times, March 18, 2005 in Keenan's obituary
available at
this link. [3] Cited by Raymond Marcus, "Truman's Warning," in E. Martin Schotz,
History Will Not Absolve Us: Orwellian Control, Public Denial, and the Murder of
President Kennedy (Brookline, Mass.: Kurtz, Ulmer & DeLucia, 1996), pp.
237-38. [4] U.S. News and World Report, July 25, 2004, Mission
Impossible. Article
available here. Originally in letter from Harry S. Truman to William B.
Arthur, June 10, 1964. Off the Record: The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman,
edited by Robert H. Ferrell (New York: Harper & Row, 1980), p. 408. [5] New York Times, April 25, 1966, "C.I.A.: Maker of Policy, or
Tool?", See a copy of this New York Times article at
this link. [6] Sergei N. Khrushchev, Nikita Khrushchev and the Creation of a
Superpower (University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University, 2000), pp.
618-19. [7] Khrushchev Remembers, ed. Edward Crankshaw (Boston: Little,
Brown, 1970), p. 498. For a summary of a crucial meeting on this,
click here. [8] Ibid., p. 630. [9] Norman Cousins, The Improbable Triumvirate (New York: W. W.
Norton, 1972), p. 9. See also the PBS text of this speech at
this link, and hear the audio under "American University Commencement
Address" at
this link. [10] New York Times, June 12, 1963, p. 1. "Harriman to Lead
Test-Ban Mission to Soviet [Union] in July." Article available at
this link. [11] Address by President John F. Kennedy to the UN General Assembly,
September 20, 1963. Available for viewing at
this
link. Quote is in the second to last paragraph. [12] Jean Daniel, "When Castro Heard the News," New Republic
(December 7, 1963), p. 7. [13] Kenneth P. O’Donnell and David F. Powers, Johnny, We Hardly Knew
Ye (Boston: Little, Brown, 1970), p. 17. [14] James W. Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why
It Matters (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2008), p. 324. Available for
viewing at
this link. [15] O'Donnell and Powers, p. 25. See also the July 24, 2010 Dallas
Morning News article which includes this story as reported by JFK aide and close
friend Kenneth O'Donnell at
this link.
What you can do:
Inform your media and political
representatives of this important information on John F. Kennedy
assassination facts and theories. To contact those close to you,
click here.
For lots more facts, information,
videos, books, and more John F. Kennedy assassination theories, see the
excellent Kennedy assassination information center at
this link.
For a collection of highly revealing
major media articles and government documents on the John F. Kennedy
assassination,
click here.
For an inspiring essay on how we can
work together to build a brighter future,
click here.
Spread this news John Kennedy
assassination facts and theories to your friends and colleagues, and
bookmark this article on key social networking websites using the "Share
This" icon on this page, so that we can fill the role at which the major
media is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference.
We need your support. Please help our
work to grow and thrive by donating at
this link.
Finding Balance: WantToKnow.info Inspiration Center
WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance disturbing cover-up
information with inspirational writings which call us to be all that we can be
and to work together for positive change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at
this link
for an abundance of uplifting material.
See our archive of highly revealing news articles at
this link
Kindly support this important work. Click here
to make a donation.
Explore the mind and heart expanding websites managed by the nonprofit
PEERS network: www.peerservice.org
- PEERS websites: Spreading inspiration, education, & empowerment www.momentoflove.org -
Every person in the world has a heart
www.personalgrowthcourses.net - Dynamic online courses powerfully expand
your horizons www.WantToKnow.info -
Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups www.weboflove.org -
Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all
