RICHARD STOLLEY
RICHARD STOLLEY
A History of the Zapruder Film
by Martin Shackelford, updated by
Debra Conway
Nov. 1962: Zapruder purchases, from Peacock Jewelry
Company on Elm St., a top of the line Model 414 PD Bell & Howell
Zoomatic Director Series Camera with Varamat 9 to 27mm F1.8 lens and
leather carrying case (photo in Trask), electric eye, springwind
indicator, and speeds of 1, 16 and 48. Serial number AS13486. It was
rated highly in the December 1963 issue of Consumers Reports. It was
spool-loaded with double 8mm film; 25 feet could be shot at a time.
The camera was relatively new, as
he apparently hadn't used it much. I thought the film in the camera was
still the first cartridge he used.
1963
Nov. 1963: Zapruder's camera is
loaded with Kodachrome II safety film; the first 25 feet was filled with
family scenes, including a grandson digging beside a tree in a backyard
patio (frame published in Esquire). Marilyn Sitzman said Zapruder was a
great Kennedy fan. He talked about bringing his movie camera to work to
film the President's visit.(Trask)
Nov. 22, mid-day: In
Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Chicago, LIFE's November 29 issue was in
its printing run of over 7 million copies, and bundles of issues were
already at distribution points. With news of the assassination, managing
editor George Hunt stopped the presses. The change cost nearly one
million dollars; initially appalled, Henry Luce later said it was the
best million he had ever spent.(Trask)
Zapruder takes footage of three
people in Dealey Plaza, one an employee of his, to make sure his take-up
reel was operating properly.(Stolley) Noticing Marilyn Sitzman, Zapruder
tests the camera and spring by filming her by a bench at the north
pergola. Seated on the bench are Charles and Beatrice Hester. Sitzman
turns to face Zapruder, waves, then turns away. He is filming from the
steps leading up to the pergola. (Trask)
Zapruder decides he needs a more
stable perch, and selects a rectangular concrete block, like those
chosen by F.M. Bell and Charles Bronson elsewhere in the Plaza. His is
185 ft. from the SW corner of the TSBD, 65 ft. from the center of Elm
St. Clumsily getting onto it, he asks Sitzman to join him, to steady him
if he got dizzy. (Location on chart in Trask, p. 56) (Trask)
Zapruder, his secretary recalled,
shakily put down his camera and started screaming "They killed him! They
killed him! They killed him!" He was so stricken by the experience that
he never quite got over it. His own was the last film or news report
about Kennedy he would ever watch.(Dallas Times Herald)
Zapruder and Sitzman, who have
just gotten down off the pedestal, are photographed by Associated Press
photographer James Altgens; also in the picture are the Hesters.(Trask)
Zapruder goes back into the
pergola, and is photographed there by Art Rickerby (photo on p. 403,
top). With him are the Hesters. Sitzman lost track of him. (Trask)
Reporter Darwin Payne described
Zapruder as "very distraught...slumped in a chair, staring at a
television set tuned to KRLD-TV, Channel 4, the CBS affiliate in
Dallas." Walter Cronkite was on the screen, saying Kennedy had been
wounded, but the extent of his wounds wasn't known. "I know he's dead,"
Zapruder said. "...I saw his head explode like a firecracker. It was the
worst thing I've ever seen. There's no way he could still be alive."
("JFK: Breaking the Silence" by Bill Sloan)
Reporter Harry McCormack takes
Sorrels to Jennifer Juniors, Inc., in the Dal-Tex Building, 501 Elm St.,
the office of Abraham Zapruder. Zapruder was emotionally upset; agreed
to furnish a copy of the film to Sorrels with the understanding that it
was strictly for official use of the Secret Service and that it would
not be shown or given to any newspapers or magazines, as he expected to
sell the film for as high a price as he could get for it. Mr. McCormack
had offered $1,000 for it, but others were also interested.(Memo from
Forrest Sorrels to Thomas Kelley)
WFAA-TV calls Eastman Kodak,
which agrees to process the film right away. A police cruiser took the
men to Kodak on Manor Way. There, Sorrels also met Phil Willis, there
with his film for processing. Sorrels left. Dan
Rather later claimed credit for arranging for the film's processing.
Zapruder had 3 copies made (possibly at Jamieson). The film was
previewed at the lab just after being developed. Zapruder was assured no
bootlegs had been made. Sorrels later picked up two of the
copies.(Trask)
After selling the
original and one copy to LIFE, Zapruder seems to have retained an
unexplained 4th copy, which Sorrels brought people over to view, being
without his copies Nov. 23-26.(Trask)
Nov. 23: With Zapruder at the
projector, the film is viewed by Richard Stolley, LIFE's Los Angeles
Bureau Chief, the only reporter among a small group of Secret Service
agents in a small room of Jennifer Juniors, early in the morning.
Zapruder ran the film again and again as newsmen from AP and UPI and
other magazines showed up. When the lights were turned on, Zapruder
looked ill. Stolley convinces Zapruder to talk with him first. (Richard
Stolley, 1973)
The original film was sent to
LIFE's Chicago plant, the copy to LIFE's New York offices. A dupe of the
original was made in Chicago and also sent to New York. Word spread in
Dallas that LIFE had bought only the print rights. (Trask)
Time approximate:Chicago LIFE
staffers study the film on a Moviola projector (editor). Frames were
selected, and 8x10 black and white prints were made. (The Great American
Magazine by Loudon Wainwright)
Nov. 24: While the original film
was in Chicago where frames were selected for publication, the duplicate
was shown to Time-LIFE executives in New York. C.D. Jackson concluded
that it was too gruesome to allow showings on TV, and ordered all rights
purchased. (Wainwright)
Stolley 1973 version: The film is
shown to Time Inc. executives in New York. LIFE's publisher, C.D.
Jackson "was so upset by the head-wound sequence that he proposed the
company obtain all rights to the film and withhold it from public
viewing at least until emotions had calmed. Zapruder seemed relieved
when Stolley called again. Stolley 1992 version: All decisions regarding
the use or non-use of the Zapruder film were made by LIFE's editors, not
by anyone (like C.D. Jackson, LIFE publisher, formerly of military
intelligence) on the publishing side.
Nov. 26: Time-LIFE editors
ordered copies of the film for themselves; as a result, bootleg copies
were produced.
Late December: J. Edgar Hoover
wrote to J. Lee Rankin, saying the CIA requested the FBI copy of the
film be loaned to them "solely for training purposes." Rankin contacted
Time, and informed the FBI that Time would contact the CIA to make their
own arrangements.(Trask)
1964
January 27: Warren Commission
staff, aided by FBI's Lyndal Shaneyfelt, began examination of a second
generation copy of the film. Examination of the film went on for 7 days.
Secret Service was also present. (Trask)
January 28: Lyndal Shaneyfelt
told the Warren Commission staff that a clear print of the film could
provide more precise information. The first generation Secret Service
copies were never requested by the Commission staff or FBI, or offered
by the Secret Service, whose agents were present. Asked later why the
Commission never subpoenaed the original film, Rankin replied (according
to Mark Lane) that it was "private property." (Trask)
February 25: LIFE photo lab
assistant chief Herbert Orth brought the original film to a meeting of
Commission staff, FBI and Secret Service, and projected it several
times. He volunteered to make 35mm transparencies, and by April produced
three sets of 159 slides: for the FBI, Secret Service and the
Commission, of frames 171 through 334. By this time, the film had
already been damaged in a "lab accident." (Trask)
September 25: After the
Commission investigation, the FBI copy of the film, and the slides, were
deposited at the National Archives.(Trask)
October 2: LIFE's
Warren Report issue has frames and captions changed twice before the
final copies hit the streets. Frame 323, which showed the President
thrown back, was replaced by 313, which had previously gone unpublished
for reasons of "taste." A caption saying JFK was thrown "to one side" by
the head shot was replaced by one saying it caused "the front part of
his head to explode forward." LIFE editor Richard Kearns said he had
never heard before of LIFE changing printing plates twice in a single
issue, much less a single story. (Jerry Policoff in "New Times")
November 30: The Warren
Commission exhibits volumes, with black and white reproductions of film
frames in Volume 18, are released by the Government Printing Office for
$80 (photo in Trask). Some researchers made crude black and white films
from the reproduced frames.(Trask)
1966
In late 1966, Bell &
Howell offered the camera to the National Archives. (Trask)
Frame 230 is
published in color on LIFE's cover with the caption "Did Oswald Act
Alone? A Matter of Reasonable Doubt." The cover story concluded the
"Single Bullet " theory was wrong, and an editorial called for a new
investigation. The issue includes color reproductions of many frames,
with sprocket hole information included. (LIFE, November 25)
December 7: Bell & Howell
transfers Zapruder's camera and leather carrying case to the National
Archives. (Trask)
1967
June 25: In "The
Warren Report," television special CBS reports on the findings of its
experts. It argued, implausibly, that the camera could have been running
slower than the FBI-tested speed, which actually contradicted the
experts. It called for Time-LIFE to make the film available to the
public, noting that LIFE had refused to allow its showing "at any
price." (Trask)
1968
January 3: This date,
Zapruder receives his final payment from LIFE magazine.
February: LIFE sent
out the original film for copying and copy slides to a New Jersey photo
lab, one of whose employees was Robert Groden, who has said he made a
copy off the original. He placed it in a bank vault, fearing the
consequences if his copying became known, and refused to say who had
assisted him. He then studied it, enhanced it by re-framing it to remove
the shakiness of the original. The result was better than the copy
studied by the FBI and the Warren Commission. He began contacting
critics. (Trask)
September 24: A federal judge
rules that the public's interest in the JFK assassination mandated that
"fair use" of the film be broadly construed; copyright scholar Melville
Nimmer, once wrote that some photographs, including the Zapruder film,
are so newsworthy that they should not be copyrightable. ("New York
Times")
1969
February: LIFE
complied with a subpoena from Jim Garrison and provided the film for
showing at the Clay Shaw trial. Security was so lax that the film was
illegally duplicated, and bootleg copies were soon sold all over the
country. They were shown at conspiracy lectures, and even a time or two
on local TV. (Stolley 1992)
WRONG SUPREME COURT
ORDER
February 13: Abraham Zapruder
appears as a prosecution witness in the Clay Shaw trial in New Orleans.
He identified it as identical to the film he shot, as the film was shown
for the first time in public. It was shown 5 times that day, altogether.
By the end of the case, it was shown 5 more times, once frame by frame.
While the film was in Garrison's possession, many copies were covertly
made. Garrison let Mark Lane make 100 copies for distribution "to
colleges and universities." Copies began surfacing all over the country;
some were 9th or 10th generation copies. (Trask)
1970
August 30: Abraham Zapruder dies
of carninoma at Dallas Presbyterian Hospital. He is buried September 1
at Temple Emanu-El cemetary. (Trask)
1973
This year, Robert
Groden showed his enhanced print of the Zapruder film at a research
conference in Boston. (Jim DeEugenio, "Destiny Betrayed")
In 1973, the Boston-based
Assassination Information Bureau began a lecture series which included
the Zapruder film. This continued for 3 years, to 600 audiences in 45
states. For $30 the AIB offered a copy of the film and a set of
slides.(Trask)
1975
April 9: Time-LIFE sells the film
to the family for $1; the media is still reporting that Zapruder got
only $25,000 for the film; his heirs have complained of dozens of
copyright violations; "The heirs would not let Time Inc. give the
original film to the National Archives, although copies will go there;
the heirs' lawyer said the family would "create a liberal policy of
making the film available to scholars or the public in a manner
consistent with their copyright interest." (Detroit Free Press) Time
Inc. assigned the film's copyright to the Zapruder family, for $1. It
donated a first generation copy, a second generation copy, and a set of
transparencies to the National Archives the same day. It was restricted
to viewing on the premises. (Trask)
The original film is
stored as a courtesy by the National Archives, without public access to
it. An archivist noted that the LIFE first generation copy was of poor
quality. The archives now had an FBI second-generation print, the
original, one first generation and one second-generation copy from LIFE.
The whereabouts of the two Secret Service first generation copies were
unknown. (Trask)
May 12: National
Archives acknowledges receipt of 323 Zapruder frame "color
transparencies" (slides) and the "first and second generation copies" of
the film from Time Incorporated, available for viewing only on the
premises of the National Archives. (Archives Change of Holdings Report)
The slides in the original set were made by Time-LIFE. The set included
frames 164 through 483, except for the missing frame 349.
From this, a reference set was
made, apparently by the Archives, covering the same frame numbers; frame
378 later found missing from this set. A reproduction set was also made,
including frames 171-343. (Archives Holding Card)
1976
This year, the reference set of
Zapruder slides was placed in the NNSP (Still Pictures Branch) research
room. (Archives memo)
January 2: Note on the slide
mounts of the reference set placed in NNSP "indicate the slide copies
were made by Color Fax, probably ordered by NARA." (Archives inventory
memo)
February 18: Henry
Zapruder offers permission to obtain a copy of the film for research
purposes only, with no further copying or exhibition, for the cost of
copying plus approximately $300 in legal expenses, payable in advance.
(Letter from Henry Zapruder)
November 22: Channel
11 in Fort Worth shows the Zapruder film after paying $300 to Mrs.
Zapruder. ("The Continuing Inquiry")
December: Penn Jones
offers KERA-TV, Dallas public TV station, a clear 16mm copy of the
Zapruder film for its annual fundraising drive, but it was rejected as
inappropriate on the grounds of taste. (Mother Jones)
1978
June: The HSCA photographic
evidence panel worked with 20 outside contractors to study the film,
both the original and a first-generation Secret Service copy, the
Groden-enhanced version, and individual frames enhanced by the Los
Alamos Scientific Laboratory under the direction of D.H. Janney. His
group "de-blurred" selected frames by computer. (Trask)
1979
Early in 1979, along with the
files of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, another copy of
the Zapruder film entered the Archives. (Trask)
1985
April: Gerard (Chip)
Selby Jr. writes to Henry Zapruder seeking permission to use the film in
his documentary; his letters and phone calls were repeatedly ignored;
eventually Mr. Zapruder's assistant quoted a price of $30,000, twice
what Mr. Selby's film had cost to make. ("New York Times")
1988
This year, the
original Zapruder slide set was transferred within the Archives; at that
time, it was found to be missing frames 180, 321, 349 and 372. The
reproduction set was found to be missing fraomes 164-170, and 344-486,
but these were never part of the original set. ( Archives memo)
October 10: James
Lesar and Chip Selby file suit against Henry Zapruder, Washington tax
attorney, for selling rights to the film. Argued there should be no
copyright claim on such an historic film, allowing the copyright holder
to dictate its use, hampering use by scholars & writers. Zapruder said
the family only charges people who use the film for commercial purposes:
"We make the film available free of charge to anyone who is not going to
use it for commercial purposes...People who are going to charge, we
charge." The original film is in storage at the National Archives.
(Associated Press) Gerald (Chip) Selby Jr., 26, represented by Jim
Lesar, sues Henry Zapruder and LMH Co.; LMH charges $30,000 for use of
the film; Selby's documentary, "Reasonable Doubt," his master's thesis,
was made in collaboration with Harold Weisberg; the Discovery Channel
offered $10,000 to show the documentary; the fee is excessive; Zapruder
says he offers the film free to those who aren't going to charge for it;
copyright was abandoned by failure to curb unauthorized used of the
film. (Houston Chronicle)
November 3: Settlement reached
between Chip Selby and LMH, says Jim Lesar; A&E will show his
documentary; the settlement forbids disclosure of the terms; James
Silverberg represented LMH; Henry Zapruder is a 'Washington tax lawyer;
Mr. Weisberg will see the areas between the sprocket holes. (Houston
Chronicle)
November 9: Still Pictures Branch
of Archives requests original slide set to make an additional set of
reference slides "due to increased reference use." (Archives letter)
November 10: Exact
date unknown. Original slide set transferred to Still Pictures Branch.
Slide 304 is now missing from the set as well. The reproduction set was
also transferred to NNSP. This set is missing frames 208-211. (Archives
inventory memo)
1991
Clear video copies of
the Zapruder film become available for sale to researchers, but their
sale is halted by threatened legal action. (Larry Howard)
1992
LMH Company loan contract
specifies that if any copies are made of the film, the charge will be
$2500 per copy; materials cannot be published or displayed without
additional fees; extensions beyond 30 days are limited to 45 days and
require an additional $75 fee. The borrower must agree to avoid making
"any reference...that the Zapruder Film was ever owned by Time, Inc., or
that Time, Inc. ever published any frames from the Zapruder Film in any
publication of Time, Inc." and must prohibit others from making such
references. (Zapruder Film loan agreement) LMH Company offers the film
(8mm or video, slides) by loan ONLY for a 30 day limit (unless they
agree to extend it) for $75 fee plus costs.(Letter from attorney James
Silverberg)
1994
It apparently remains
legally impossible to purchase a complete copy of the Zapruder film from
the Zapruder family for less than $2500, or to purchase a set of frame
slides.
1996
June: ARRB meets with Eastman
Kodak Company to seek scientific advice and analysis of the Zapruder
film and other photographic records
September: Kodak scientists James Milch and Roland Zavada examine the
original Zapruder film and copies at NARA for the first time
December: Zavada prepares a preliminary findings report and meets with
the ARRB
1997
March: Doug Horne of
the ARRB staff presents a description report of all Zapruder films held
by NARA.
April 2. The Assassination
Records Review Board holds a public hearing at the original National
Archives,Washington, D.C. with selected speakers and experts giving
opinions on the monetary value of the Zapruder film.
April: The ARRB makes
the Zapruder film an "assassination document" under the JFK Act.
June/July: ARRB meets with five
former Dallas Kodak lab employees to verify how the film was handled and
processed the day of the assassination.
August: Kodak rehires
retired scientist Roland Zavada to oversee and prepare a study and final
report for ARRB. Kodak representatives meet with ARRB to finalize
responsibilities and fees, eventually donating $11,000 worth of time and
expertise on Zapruder film analyses
September: Zavada conducts a second examination of the original Zapruder
film and copies held by NARA
1998
August: The original
film was purchased by the United States government under the doctrine of
eminent domain, and Zapruder's heirs sued to increase the amount paid
for it to $16,000,000. The Zapruder family still retains all showing
rights to the film.
Zapruder Family makes copies of
the film available to the public on video and DVD under partnership with
Chicago media company, MPI Media Group. Titled "Image
of an Assassination: A New Look at the Zapruder Film," this
collection includes enhanced film in various sequences, including one
with the sprocket hole images made from the digitized frames.
September: Zavada's
lengthy final report is presented to the ARRB. His final
determination is that the film held in the National Archives is the
actual original Zapruder flim.
2000
The Zapruder family
at that time also donated one of the copies and various LIFE photo
prints to the Sixth Floor Museum in what used to be the Texas School
Book Depository building. Zapruder family donates film rights to Sixth
Floor Museum in Dallas.
Among the items in The Zapruder
Collection are:
- The only privately held
first day, first-generation print of the Zapruder film, previously
unreported to have existed.
- Numerous film copies-in a
variety of formats including 8mm, 16 mm, and 35 mm. Some in full
color and some in black and white. These copy prints and negatives
of the Zapruder film were apparently utilized by Time-Life for
publication layout and internally for reference.
- Two complete sets of 4x5
color transparencies--these are LIFE 1st generation copies of each
frame of the original film as they existed in 1963/1964, before any
fading and damage appeared.
- 8x10 glossy color prints of
Zapruder film frames-these are LIFE prints of each frame. Again,
they show each frame as they existed in 1963/1964, before any fading
and damage appeared.
Sixth Floor Museum - Zapruder_Press_Conference.htm
The original Zapruder film is
part of the Kennedy Collection and is in the custody of the Motion
Picture Sound and Video staff, at the National Archives at College Park.
NARA may make a single fair-use copy of the film and sell it to any
researcher. However, the copyright for the film is owned by the Sixth
Floor Museum in Dallas Texas. If a researcher chooses to publish the
film in any way, he or she will need to obtain permission from the
copyright holders.
NOT
TRUE !
The
ARRB paid the Zapruder family $16 Million of Tax Payer’s money for that
film.
Making it the property of the American people
|