SAM BROWN

Welcome to Rogue's Gallery Sam

The dialogue between Sam & I began with this (below)

May I ask exactly what makes you believe in Oswald's guilt Sam?

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:465e3a20$0$28584$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Q077i.114169$NK5.85720@newsfe23.lga...
>> The fact that you didn't know the difference between criminal/civil cases
>> requirements.
>> Is why I questioned your citizenship.
>
> Well thats just plain silly Tom, Americans didnt invent the legal system,
> you are merely the most litigious.
> I think you'll find that the rules change from state to state in your
> country.
>
>>
>> You stste below that you believe in Oswald's guilt.
>
> Yes I do.
>
>>
>> Are you willing to adress evidence/testimony?
>
> Sure, but I'm not prepared to give weight to the silly myths that surround
> this case either. I am open to the possibility of a conspiracy but I think
> most of the theorys I've read about so far are downright ludicrous.
> Please Tom, dont ask me about Bakers different accounts of his encounter
> with Oswald as I consider this to be another irrelevance that stops
> discussion from getting to the real crux of the matter.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:465ced22$0$19665$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:vQ57i.114158$NK5.65175@newsfe23.lga...
>>>> "Preponderance of the evidence" is the Criteria for CIVIL Trials Sam.
>>>
>>> There was no trial Tom.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Criminal Trials require "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt to a moral
>>>> certainty".
>>>
>>> Yep and I believe Oswald to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Having
>>> said that I must reiterate that I am yet to be convince that he was not
>>> encouraged by others. I'm looking forward to reading Bugliosis book, to
>>> see if he will have a convincing argument for that.
>>>>
>>>> Are you a citizen of a Different Country?
>>>
>>> Yes, I am a citizen of both Australia and Great Britain. What is the
>>> relevance of your question?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:465ce2e2$0$19720$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:O4E6i.559034$Pi4.545845@newsfe14.lga...
>>>>>> No comment on the NEGATIVE parrifin test on Oswald's cheek?
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again Tom, the proponderance of the evidence points to Oswald as
>>>>> the shooter. The parafin test doesn't prove a damn thing one way or
>>>>> the other.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you insist on Oswalds innocence? I think perhaps you need to
>>>>> take a deep breath and try to consider the fact that the guy is in all
>>>>> probability a double murderer.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:465a6449$0$15974$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1qs6i.553683$Pi4.224846@newsfe14.lga...
>>>>>>>> Thank You Sam;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you aware that paraffin tests showed NEGATIVE on Oswald's
>>>>>>>> cheeks?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indicating he did NOT fire a rifle thast day?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you aware that the authorities Withheld/Altered/Destroyed
>>>>>>>> evicence & suborned Perjury?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know that there have been questions raised about various matters
>>>>>>> in the case but I still think the bulk of the evidence points to
>>>>>>> Oswald being the shooter. I am yet to be convinced that Oswald was
>>>>>>> not working in conjunction with others. I am also not convinced that
>>>>>>> he wasn't just another nutcase hoping to get his name in the papers
>>>>>>> either. After all he did seem to try quite hard to be noticed on
>>>>>>> quite a few occasions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm quite fascinated by the US in the 60's. I admit I don't have a
>>>>>>> lot of emotion invested in the assassination, its another watershed
>>>>>>> event in a decade that seems littered with them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4659228e$0$11985$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oswald lone gunman. Yep
>>>>>>>>> Conspiracy? Not sure.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:%O76i.317053$2Q1.191829@newsfe16.lga...
>>>>>>>>>> Sam;
>>>>>>>>>> Please tell us your position on the Assassination.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you believe in a Lone Assassin?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or, do you believe in a Conspiracy?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:4658eb13$0$2869$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:f3anje0fgc@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>> <1180154867.453991.280960@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> aeffects
>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On May 25, 7:39 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:f37dc402taq@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > In article <H5mdnZdoUNnHtcrbRVny...@pipex.net>, Clairybums
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>"cdddraftsman" <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>news:1180116059.223339.43040@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >><snipped>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I already addressed the issue that I could have used a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>better word than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>"entertainment"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I don't post as I don't feel that I have either knowledge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>or experience
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>enough to give a reasoned argument. I also don't come from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>the USA. I AM,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>however, very interested in history and crime and have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>reading this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>newsgroup for the past few years as I have an avid interest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>in the JFK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Assassination. I like to read from the American point of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>view.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Posts like yours detract from that and your new thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>here, addressed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>me, as if to try and embarrass me into an argument or to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>state whose side
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I'm on simply confirms my initial thoughts about you. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>off back to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>reading and will try to filter out your negative and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>abusive posts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>wherever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>possible. Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Claire McConville
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Try locating a "killfilter" setting on your newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > reader. It depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > on how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > you access the newsgroups. I use a paid service, so I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > filter out the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > trolls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > - but there are also many excellent free newsreaders that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > can filter out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > so you never see their posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It's a virtual necessity in this forum, as there are many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > who've sometimes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > honest enough to admit that their intent is to shut down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > any reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > debate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > on the JFK assassination.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Keep lurking... I'm sure that you'll enjoy the group once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > you get rid of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > trolls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And for Gods sake dont ever disagree with his Benship or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'll killfile you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How silly! LNT'ers who aren't trolls (or, for that matter,
>>>>>>>>>>>> CT'ers who are not
>>>>>>>>>>>> trolls) don't get killfiled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Only trolls.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Liar. You kill filed me because you were in the wrong. You have
>>>>>>>>>>> no idea of my position on the assassination. And you leave your
>>>>>>>>>>> pathetic little lapdog healy to defend you. Coward.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to see another female here however. Also another non
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> american, welcome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but dont expect much rational discussion here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course not... When LNT'ers are unable to respond to serious
>>>>>>>>>>>> points raised
>>>>>>>>>>>> about the evidence, and are unable in many cases to *CITE*,
>>>>>>>>>>>> there can be no
>>>>>>>>>>>> "rational" discussion. Particularly when those such as
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugliosi simply labels
>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone who fails to believe the WCR as a "kook". There is no
>>>>>>>>>>>> "rational"
>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion where ad hominem reigns supreme.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yawn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>nor believe you're of the female type....

as you can see, the Insults originated with Sam

I wonder if she realizes that her "Name-Calling" opens the door for others
to RETALIATE?

"Bud" <sirslick@fast.net> wrote in message
news:1180990075.422285.271980@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> aeffects wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> > "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>> >
>> > news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>> > > Marsh
>> > > says...
>> >
>> > >>Bud wrote:
>> > >>> Speed wrote:
>> > >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my question
>> > >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>> > >>>> Here
>> > >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>> >
>> > >>>    Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>> > >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>> > >>> prior
>> >
>> > >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were changes.
>> >
>> > >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a conspirator,
>> >
>> > >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning
>> > >>the
>> > >>assassination.
>> >
>> > > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>> > > why
>> > > Tony
>> > > tries to make this point.
>> >
>> > > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>> > > is...
>> >
>> > They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>> > Dickhead.
>>
>> oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>
>   I thought when she said "Dickhead", she was only giving you notice
> that it was your turn to comment.
>
>> > >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>> > >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>> > >>> dissuade
>> > >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>> >
>> > >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>> > >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>> > >>>> understood we
>> > >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>> > >>>> We
>> > >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you probably
>> > >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>> > >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>> > >>>> truck.
>> > >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>> > >>>> was
>> > >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news nature...and
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish the
>> > >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the ground,
>> > >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>> > >>>> cars
>> > >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>> > >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor view
>> > >>>> of
>> > >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade started."
>> > >>>> The
>> > >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been changed.
>> >
>> > >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>> > >>>> 1993,
>> > >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>> > >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>> >
>> > >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom always
>> > >>>> was
>> > >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>> > >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>> > >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>> > >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it was
>> > >>>> canceled."
>> >
>> > >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and photographers
>> > >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>> > >>>> House
>> > >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>> > >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>> > >>>> 21,
>> > >>>> 1963.
>> >
>> > >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>> > >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>> > >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>> > >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>> > >>>> shoved
>> > >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>> > >>>> was
>> > >>>> too late."
>> >
>> > >>>    The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>> > >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>> > >>> portruding
>> > >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>> > >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>> > >>> everyone in Dallas.
>> >
>> > >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>> > >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured
>> > >>an
>> > >>image of the rifle being fired.
>

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180973169.797954.24900@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 3:25 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> "RICLAND" <blackwr...@lycos.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:oqydnfRKoqBcFP7bnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> > Kenneth A. Rahn wrote:
>> >> Ricland, is there something seriously wrong with you? Pat Lambert is
>> >> traveling now, without access to the Internet.
>>
>> >> Ken Rahn
>>
>> > No disrespect, Ken. Just doing my job.
>>
>> WTF???? Are you mad? Who employs you? It's not your job you pompous fool
>> ,
>> it's your hobby.
>>
>>
>>
>> > It was your comment about her not having internet access because she's
>> > going away for weeks that did it.
>>
>> Why? What is so hard to believe about this?
>>
>>
>>
>> > Of course that's an insult to our intelligence. Where can she possibly
>> > be
>> > going where she doesn't have access to the internet?
>>
>> Any number of places. She is NOT obliged to reveal her whereabouts to
>> anyone, least of all you.
>>
>>
>>
>> > My sense is that she's not being completely forthcoming with you, that
>> > she's stalling.
>>
>> Now theres a surprise. Sinister isn't it? She's sitting in her living
>> room,
>> curtains drawn, lights out and phone unplugged, a loaded 38 in one hand
>> and
>> a tumbler of whiskey in the other. Tell me Ric, ever feel afraid to leave
>> the house?You should they're all out to get you. Kook
>>
>
> something tells me ole Sammy boyo isn't a CT.... LMFAO! moron......

Shows how crap your powers of deduction are doesn't it Healy? I don't know
if there was a conspiracy. I do believe that Oswald was the gunman. Oh and
once again I am a female. I know this confuses you as you only have Ben as a
reference point. And don't you know its rude to speak with your mouth full?

>
>
>>
>> > This thing must be dealt with now. She should have dropped what she was
>> > doing and fired off a post explaining why her fingerprints are all over
>> > Vinny's Garrison chapter.
>>
>> > She should have done that immediately.
>>
>> Oh Grow up Ricland. She has a life and is entitled to spend her time in
>> anyway she sees fit.
>>
>>
>>
>> > ricland
>>
>> > --
>> > "Vince Bugliosi wrote "99.9%" of the book himself. He confirmed this on
>> > a radio or TV interview this month."
>> > --David Von Pein 6/3/07
>>
>> > Reclaiming History -- The Rebuttals
>> > The Rebuttals to Bugliosi's JFK Assassination Book
>> >http://jfkhit.com
>
>

Above her insults start becoming sexual

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180994985.967672.168410@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 3:02 pm, chuck schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 11:38 am, aeffects <aeffe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hell, I'm going to give you 5 stars too.....5 stars for FAILURE to
>> > deal with reality....LMFAO!
>>
>> OK, where are my five stars?
>>
>>
>>
>> > So Chuckie daShoe.... does it look like there's any Conspiracy let up
>> > hereabouts? Does it look and sound like the CT cause has went up in
>> > flames....
>>
>> No. There will always be a conspriacy POV regarding this case. It's a
>> religion based on faith and belief and not facts.
>>
>
> here all along I thought only the Warranistas had a lock on JFK/WCR
> religion
>
>>
>> > You moron Bugliosi and his book went into the tank... explain THAT
>> > away.... Yo and your ilk failed, A G A I N!
>>
>> Interest in the case is waning, but his book is/has sold respectable
>> numbers, Healy.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Where's our resident Bugliosi idolator Von Pein, btw? Taking a
>> > *seppuku* class?-
>>
>> He's probably wondering why he even bothers to trade jibes with mental
>> midgets like you.
>>
>> Do you even have a theory? Mr. Mustard in the library with the
>> candlestick? Professor Plum in the study with the rope?
>
> get your head outt'a your ass, speak Englisha.....
>
>
>> Come up with something...anything. 44 years is plenty of time to
>> figure it out.
>
> have, so wake up douche bag.... the Zapruder film was altered, that's
> all I need, 6 years and counting little feller --
>
> How do YOU spell C O N S P I R A C Y?????

How do you spell FITZGERALD????? Seems to me anyone who confuses it with
FRANCIS should probably stick to servicing Ben. Knobend.
>
>

Above, she spews her Venom on ANYONE

She thought I was Great Here below

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180986989.699856.290640@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 11:19 am, Ben Holmes <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote:
>> In article <1180978323.170996.274...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>> aeffects
>> says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> >> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>
>> >> > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>> >> > Marsh
>> >> > says...
>>
>> >> >>Bud wrote:
>> >> >>> Speed wrote:
>> >> >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my
>> >> >>>> question
>> >> >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>> >> >>>> Here
>> >> >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>
>> >> >>> Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>> >> >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>> >> >>> prior
>>
>> >> >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were
>> >> >>changes.
>>
>> >> >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a
>> >> >>> conspirator,
>>
>> >> >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning
>> >> >>the
>> >> >>assassination.
>>
>> >> > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>> >> > why
>> >> > Tony tries to make this point.
>>
>> >> > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>> >> > is...
>>
>> >> They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>> >> Dickhead.
>>
>> >oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>>
>> There's far too many things to spend time on in this short life, to
>> bother
>> reading such trolls... Sam was killfiled, you really should do the same!
>
> I believe your correct--point taken and will follow the advice...

Of Course you will you pointless little sycophant. Tomln has more cred than
you, at least he thinks for himself.
Bye Bye you'll be missed whatsamacallit.

>
>
>> Sam's only purpose is to demonstrate the character divide between CT'ers
>> and
>> LNT'ers... for lurkers who are beginning to learn the facts about the
>> assassination.
>>
>> >> >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>> >> >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>> >> >>> dissuade
>> >> >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>
>> >> >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>> >> >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>> >> >>>> understood we
>> >> >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>> >> >>>> We
>> >> >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you
>> >> >>>> probably
>> >> >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>> >> >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>> >> >>>> truck.
>> >> >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>> >> >>>> was
>> >> >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news
>> >> >>>> nature...and the
>> >> >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish
>> >> >>>> the
>> >> >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the
>> >> >>>> ground,
>> >> >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>> >> >>>> cars
>> >> >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>> >> >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor
>> >> >>>> view of
>> >> >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade
>> >> >>>> started." The
>> >> >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been
>> >> >>>> changed.
>>
>> >> >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>> >> >>>> 1993,
>> >> >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at
>> >> >>>> the
>> >> >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>> >> >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>
>> >> >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom
>> >> >>>> always was
>> >> >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>> >> >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>> >> >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>> >> >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>> >> >>>> the
>> >> >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it
>> >> >>>> was
>> >> >>>> canceled."
>>
>> >> >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and
>> >> >>>> photographers
>> >> >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>> >> >>>> House
>> >> >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>> >> >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>> >> >>>> 21,
>> >> >>>> 1963.
>>
>> >> >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>> >> >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>> >> >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>> >> >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>> >> >>>> shoved
>> >> >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>> >> >>>> was
>> >> >>>> too late."
>>
>> >> >>> The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>> >> >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>> >> >>> portruding
>> >> >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>> >> >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>> >> >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>
>> >> >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>> >> >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured
>> >> >>an
>> >> >>image of the rifle being fired.

"Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
news:f41l4601mnd@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <1180978323.170996.274540@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> aeffects
> says...
>>
>>On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>>> > Marsh
>>> > says...
>>>
>>> >>Bud wrote:
>>> >>> Speed wrote:
>>> >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my question
>>> >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>>> >>>> Here
>>> >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>>
>>> >>> Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>>> >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>>> >>> prior
>>>
>>> >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were changes.
>>>
>>> >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a conspirator,
>>>
>>> >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning the
>>> >>assassination.
>>>
>>> > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>>> > why
>>> > Tony tries to make this point.
>>>
>>> > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>>> > is...
>>>
>>> They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>>> Dickhead.
>>
>>oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>
>
> There's far too many things to spend time on in this short life, to bother
> reading such trolls... Sam was killfiled, you really should do the same!
>
> Sam's only purpose is to demonstrate the character divide between CT'ers
> and
> LNT'ers... for lurkers who are beginning to learn the facts about the
> assassination.

And yor only purpose is to illustrate how SOME CT Kooks get far too
emotional about the topic to be rational. Now continue with your verbal
masterbation.
>
>
>
>>> >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>>> >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>>> >>> dissuade
>>> >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>>
>>> >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>>> >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I understood
>>> >>>> we
>>> >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>>> >>>> We
>>> >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you probably
>>> >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>>> >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>>> >>>> truck.
>>> >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>>> >>>> was
>>> >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news nature...and
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish the
>>> >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the ground,
>>> >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>>> >>>> cars
>>> >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>>> >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor view
>>> >>>> of
>>> >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade started."
>>> >>>> The
>>> >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been changed.
>>>
>>> >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>>> >>>> 1993,
>>> >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at the
>>> >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>>> >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>>
>>> >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom always
>>> >>>> was
>>> >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>>> >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>>> >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>>> >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it was
>>> >>>> canceled."
>>>
>>> >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and photographers
>>> >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>>> >>>> House
>>> >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>>> >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>>> >>>> 21,
>>> >>>> 1963.
>>>
>>> >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>>> >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>>> >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>>> >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>>> >>>> shoved
>>> >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>>> >>>> was
>>> >>>> too late."
>>>
>>> >>> The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>>> >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>>> >>> portruding
>>> >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>>> >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>>> >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>>
>>> >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>>> >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured an
>>> >>image of the rifle being fired.

HERE is the Curteous Warning...

"tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
news:37%8i.18244$gM1.7750@newsfe21.lga...
>I wonder if she realizes that her "Name-Calling" opens the door for others
>to RETALIATE?

Oh Tom, say it isn't so. I didn't insult you. As I said in an earlier post I
place your opinion WAAAYYYY above Healy and Benny the dwarfs(love that
term). Healy is a mindless sycophant and Ben is a narcissist with a small
penis.

> "Bud" <sirslick@fast.net> wrote in message
> news:1180990075.422285.271980@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> aeffects wrote:
>>> On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> > "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>> >
>>> > news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>>> > > Marsh
>>> > > says...
>>> >
>>> > >>Bud wrote:
>>> > >>> Speed wrote:
>>> > >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my
>>> > >>>> question
>>> > >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>>> > >>>> Here
>>> > >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>> >
>>> > >>>    Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>>> > >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>>> > >>> prior
>>> >
>>> > >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were
>>> > >>changes.
>>> >
>>> > >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a
>>> > >>> conspirator,
>>> >
>>> > >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning
>>> > >>the
>>> > >>assassination.
>>> >
>>> > > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>>> > > why
>>> > > Tony
>>> > > tries to make this point.
>>> >
>>> > > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>>> > > is...
>>> >
>>> > They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>>> > Dickhead.
>>>
>>> oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>>
>>   I thought when she said "Dickhead", she was only giving you notice
>> that it was your turn to comment.
>>
>>> > >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>>> > >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>>> > >>> dissuade
>>> > >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>>> > >>> the
>>> > >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>> >
>>> > >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>>> > >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>>> > >>>> understood we
>>> > >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>>> > >>>> We
>>> > >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you
>>> > >>>> probably
>>> > >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>>> > >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>>> > >>>> truck.
>>> > >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>>> > >>>> was
>>> > >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news
>>> > >>>> nature...and the
>>> > >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish
>>> > >>>> the
>>> > >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the
>>> > >>>> ground,
>>> > >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>>> > >>>> cars
>>> > >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>>> > >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor
>>> > >>>> view of
>>> > >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade
>>> > >>>> started." The
>>> > >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been
>>> > >>>> changed.
>>> >
>>> > >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>>> > >>>> 1993,
>>> > >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at
>>> > >>>> the
>>> > >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>>> > >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>> >
>>> > >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom
>>> > >>>> always was
>>> > >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>>> > >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>>> > >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>>> > >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>>> > >>>> the
>>> > >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it
>>> > >>>> was
>>> > >>>> canceled."
>>> >
>>> > >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and
>>> > >>>> photographers
>>> > >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>>> > >>>> House
>>> > >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>>> > >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>>> > >>>> 21,
>>> > >>>> 1963.
>>> >
>>> > >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>>> > >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>>> > >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>>> > >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>>> > >>>> shoved
>>> > >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>>> > >>>> was
>>> > >>>> too late."
>>> >
>>> > >>>    The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>>> > >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>>> > >>> portruding
>>> > >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>>> > >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>>> > >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>> >
>>> > >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>>> > >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured
>>> > >>an
>>> > >>image of the rifle being fired.

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180992818.889123.86660@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 1:43 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>> aeffects wrote:
>> > On Jun 4, 11:19 am, Ben Holmes <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote:
>> > > In article <1180978323.170996.274...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>> > > aeffects
>> > > says...
>>
>> > > >On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> > > >> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>
>> > > >>news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>
>> > > >> > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>,
>> > > >> > Anthony Marsh
>> > > >> > says...
>>
>> > > >> >>Bud wrote:
>> > > >> >>> Speed wrote:
>> > > >> >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my
>> > > >> >>>> question
>> > > >> >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the
>> > > >> >>>> motorcade. Here
>> > > >> >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>
>> > > >> >>>    Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person
>> > > >> >>> who
>> > > >> >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person
>> > > >> >>> had prior
>>
>> > > >> >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were
>> > > >> >>changes.
>>
>> > > >> >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a
>> > > >> >>> conspirator,
>>
>> > > >> >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with
>> > > >> >>planning the
>> > > >> >>assassination.
>>
>> > > >> > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may
>> > > >> > wonder why
>> > > >> > Tony tries to make this point.
>>
>> > > >> > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing,
>> > > >> > that is...
>>
>> > > >> They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand
>> > > >> clothing.
>> > > >> Dickhead.
>>
>> > > >oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here
>> > > >yet!
>>
>> > > There's far too many things to spend time on in this short life, to
>> > > bother
>> > > reading such trolls... Sam was killfiled, you really should do the
>> > > same!
>>
>> > I believe your correct--point taken and will follow the advice...
>>
>>    <snicker> Just say the word, Ben, and Healy will light his
>> genitals on fire.
>
> gawd its balls you fucking idiot... not that you wingnut, tin-foil
> beannie north of the Charles River over-educated morons know what
> balls are used for... I bet you still read PlayGirl & Hustler (in that
> order), don't ya? <snort-snort>

Oh dear, perhaps it's time to shut your yap. Not too quickly! Give Ben a
chance to withdraw! That was probably the worst response I have ever seen
from you Healy.

>
>
>> > > Sam's only purpose is to demonstrate the character divide between
>> > > CT'ers and
>> > > LNT'ers... for lurkers who are beginning to learn the facts about the
>> > > assassination.
>>
>> > > >> >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling
>> > > >> >>> this
>> > > >> >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>> > > >> >>> dissuade
>> > > >> >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere.
>> > > >> >>> Get on the
>> > > >> >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>
>> > > >> >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the
>> > > >> >>>> Warren
>> > > >> >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>> > > >> >>>> understood we
>> > > >> >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the
>> > > >> >>>> President]. We
>> > > >> >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you
>> > > >> >>>> probably
>> > > >> >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things
>> > > >> >>>> and
>> > > >> >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with
>> > > >> >>>> the truck.
>> > > >> >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car
>> > > >> >>>> that I was
>> > > >> >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news
>> > > >> >>>> nature...and the
>> > > >> >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only
>> > > >> >>>> distinguish the
>> > > >> >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the
>> > > >> >>>> ground,
>> > > >> >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in
>> > > >> >>>> the cars
>> > > >> >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty
>> > > >> >>>> well
>> > > >> >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor
>> > > >> >>>> view of
>> > > >> >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade
>> > > >> >>>> started." The
>> > > >> >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been
>> > > >> >>>> changed.
>>
>> > > >> >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November
>> > > >> >>>> 20, 1993,
>> > > >> >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled
>> > > >> >>>> at the
>> > > >> >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>> > > >> >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>
>> > > >> >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom
>> > > >> >>>> always was
>> > > >> >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>> > > >> >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was
>> > > >> >>>> standard
>> > > >> >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the
>> > > >> >>>> selected
>> > > >> >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was
>> > > >> >>>> understood the
>> > > >> >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment
>> > > >> >>>> it was
>> > > >> >>>> canceled."
>>
>> > > >> >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and
>> > > >> >>>> photographers
>> > > >> >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including
>> > > >> >>>> White House
>> > > >> >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>> > > >> >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including
>> > > >> >>>> November 21,
>> > > >> >>>> 1963.
>>
>> > > >> >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in
>> > > >> >>>> the
>> > > >> >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House
>> > > >> >>>> pool
>> > > >> >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on
>> > > >> >>>> that
>> > > >> >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>> > > >> >>>> shoved
>> > > >> >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested,
>> > > >> >>>> but it was
>> > > >> >>>> too late."
>>
>> > > >> >>>    The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on
>> > > >> >>> film
>> > > >> >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>> > > >> >>> portruding
>> > > >> >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of
>> > > >> >>> the
>> > > >> >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just
>> > > >> >>> about
>> > > >> >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>
>> > > >> >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that
>> > > >> >>the
>> > > >> >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer
>> > > >> >>captured an
>> > > >> >>image of the rifle being fired.

INTRODUCE "LEZBO" HERE>>> (by Sam)

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181097655.893124.119070@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 5, 7:20 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> <ecag...@tx.rr.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1181081212.397138.91220@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > DVP True Story re The QuestionMan Healy:
>> > I badgered him for 2, 3 days to post his
>> > "conspiracy theory".. Perhaps 6-8 times..
>> > I even humilated him by pointing out he
>> > was a CTer sans the CT. Finally The Q Man
>> > stepped forward and presented his (har-har)
>> > "conspiracy theory":
>>
>> >             ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>> > "We've got a conspiracy here!!! What are YOU
>> > going to do about it?"
>> >   -Question Man Healy explaining his CT OFF
>> >             ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>>
>> > (THIS was David Healy's "conspiracy theory.)
>>
>> >             MR :~? ED
>>
>> Perhaps he's waiting for Ben to tell him what the conspiracy was. We all
>> know independent thought is beyond
>> the poor wee mite.
>>
>
> Love you too, snookum's. Certainly hope you have more men in your
> miserable life than what you find here. I doubt it, however!

There are plenty of Men here silly! You are just not one of them.
Anyway like you I am a big homo. Yes that's right, big lesbo! Any other
questions?

>
> So, what's the story with Z-132/133?

You tell me.
>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 5, 6:21 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> What's the "evidence" you're talking about, David H.?
>>
>> >> You NEVER present anything. Period.
>>
>> >> And even if you DID present anything, you cannot possibly present any
>> >> hard physical evidence pointing toward conspiracy....because none
>> >> exists. Period.
>>
>> >> You have no bullets leading to a plot.
>> >> You have no guns.
>> >> You have no witnesses who saw anyone with a gun other than an Oswald-
>> >> like person with a gun.
>> >> You have no bullet shells.
>> >> You have no fingerprints either. (And I love what Vince Bugliosi does
>> >> to Mac Wallace in his book. He talked to the man who compared the
>> >> supposed "Wallace box print". You want me to tell you what the result
>> >> was? It's a howl. .... I'll let you look it up....if you dare read
>> >> RH.)
>>
>> >> Simple question.....
>>
>> >> Why don't you think all of the above is even the slightest bit ODD if
>> >> the multi-gun conspiracy you aspire to really occurred?
>>
>> >> The only evidence points to Oswald. And the only thing you can
>> >> possibly hang your hat on is guesswork that somebody put Oswald up to
>> >> it. And even that is weaker than 20-year-old coffee.
>>
>> >> Why not just admit you're wrong and start up another hobby? That's
>> >> easier than being embarrassed day after day by relying on nothing
>> >> substantive re. a conspiracy.

HER ATTITUDE SWITCHES HERE.

Sam;
Your use of the words "cherry-picking" is called "Reasonable Doubt" in the
Legal System.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:466618f0$0$994$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
> news:f44tdp082n@drn.newsguy.com...
>> In article <1181084645.742652.131460@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>> justme1952@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>>On Jun 5, 6:46 pm, cdddraftsman <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jun 5, 12:53 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > lowery admits that thew WCR is Phony.
>>>>
>>>> > So I guess you'll have to remove your web site off the net asshoe !
>>>>
>>>
>>>Tomnln,
>>>If the WCR is phoney then why do you constantly quote evidence/
>>>testimony (lord I've grown to hate those words it's all that ever
>>>comes out of his mouth) from it???? Your so confused you don't know
>>>what your talking about anymore. No surprises there....
>>
>> There's a big difference between the evidence that the WC put in it's 26
>> volumes
>> (despite evidence that's *missing* unaccountably from these volumes) and
>> the use
>> that the WCR made of them.
>>
>> For simple examples that anyone can follow, simply look up the series of
>> posts
>> entitled "Provable Lies of the Warren Commission" - where I look at the
>> evidence
>> that the WC published, then look at what they *said* they had.
>>
>> Unfortunately, most LNT'ers do indeed hate the evidence & testimony ...
>> for it
>> simply doesn't support their theories. (Note the plural)
>
> That's just fancy talk for "cherry picking" you are just too idiotic to
> realise it.

Sam;
Find it HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46663357$0$22416$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi Tom,
>
> I think its disgusting and innappropriate if true. I think lawyers have
> done much to sully their own reputations with this kind of behaviour. It
> is not unheard of. But can you offer me proof of it happening in this
> case? And would it, in and of itself prove Oswald innocent or that there
> was a definite conspiracy?
> Cheers
> Sam
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:xkq9i.49015$NU1.42356@newsfe13.lga...
>> Hi Sam;
>> How do you feel about a WC Lawyer suborning Perjury from a witness??
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46662f6b$0$17153$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:SVp9i.168003$mJ1.29547@newsfe22.lga...
>>>> Sam;
>>>> Your use of the words "cherry-picking" is called "Reasonable Doubt" in
>>>> the Legal System.
>>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> We'll have to agree to disagree here. I thinks its inconsistent to refer
>>> to WCR as a lie but somehow its ok as a cite when it does not preclude
>>> Oswald as the lone gunman or point to a possible conspiracy.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:466618f0$0$994$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:f44tdp082n@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>>>> In article <1181084645.742652.131460@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> justme1952@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jun 5, 6:46 pm, cdddraftsman <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 12:53 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > lowery admits that thew WCR is Phony.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > So I guess you'll have to remove your web site off the net asshoe
>>>>>>>> > !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tomnln,
>>>>>>>If the WCR is phoney then why do you constantly quote evidence/
>>>>>>>testimony (lord I've grown to hate those words it's all that ever
>>>>>>>comes out of his mouth) from it???? Your so confused you don't know
>>>>>>>what your talking about anymore. No surprises there....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's a big difference between the evidence that the WC put in it's
>>>>>> 26 volumes
>>>>>> (despite evidence that's *missing* unaccountably from these volumes)
>>>>>> and the use
>>>>>> that the WCR made of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For simple examples that anyone can follow, simply look up the series
>>>>>> of posts
>>>>>> entitled "Provable Lies of the Warren Commission" - where I look at
>>>>>> the evidence
>>>>>> that the WC published, then look at what they *said* they had.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, most LNT'ers do indeed hate the evidence & testimony
>>>>>> ... for it
>>>>>> simply doesn't support their theories. (Note the plural)
>>>>>
>>>>> That's just fancy talk for "cherry picking" you are just too idiotic
>>>>> to realise it.

Nobody has to get into insults like "big lezzo & carpet munching".

Scripture already did that in cleaner language.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469841ec$0$14405$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Doncha just love it when they start lecturing about hatred, and then start
> in on the homophobic insults. Priceless.
> Oh and Gil, its me Slammy who's the big queer. Congratulations on
> maintaining your lousy accuracy stats. Please feel free to launch into the
> "big lezzo" & "carpet munching" insults.
>
> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1184355244.503967.236300@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> the same hatreds, the same stupidity and the same body. He/she is a
>> gender bender. Str8 from the J Edna Hoover School for transvestites.
>>
Above Sam claims that Scripture is Homophobic.

Sam;
If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave those who
Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>> It works for me every day.
>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>
>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>
> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse, doncha
> think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a plate by now
> Tom?
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>
>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>
>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>
>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a time.
>>>>
>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20 years,
>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With the
>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames into
>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted -- squashed
>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>> > good --
>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is enlarged
>>>> > onto
>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of that
>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>
>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket holes,
>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image files
>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all frames
>>>> > that
>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the film
>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the actual
>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>
>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

MORE DENIAL FROM SAM

Where can I read up on Your GOD???

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46986c73$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Tom
>
> We will never agree on this God business, you stick to your beliefs and
> I'll stick to mine.
> My God is a loving one.
>
> Sam
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:7YZli.20770$wG2.15633@newsfe17.lga...
>> Sam;
>> If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave those
>> who
>> Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>>>> It works for me every day.
>>>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>>>
>>> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse, doncha
>>> think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a plate by now
>>> Tom?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20 years,
>>>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With the
>>>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames into
>>>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted -- squashed
>>>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>>>> > good --
>>>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is enlarged
>>>>>> > onto
>>>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of that
>>>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket
>>>>>> > holes,
>>>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image files
>>>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all frames
>>>>>> > that
>>>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the film
>>>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the
>>>>>> > actual
>>>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

START THE RIDE HERE>>>

Do you REALLY wanna trade insults with me Sam???

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4698724b$0$844$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> I'm not sure if theres a childrens edition, I'll get back to you.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Ql_li.20780$wG2.13209@newsfe17.lga...
>> Where can I read up on Your GOD???
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46986c73$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> We will never agree on this God business, you stick to your beliefs and
>>> I'll stick to mine.
>>> My God is a loving one.
>>>
>>> Sam
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:7YZli.20770$wG2.15633@newsfe17.lga...
>>>> Sam;
>>>> If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave
>>>> those who
>>>> Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>>>>>> It works for me every day.
>>>>>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>>>>>
>>>>> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse,
>>>>> doncha think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a
>>>>> plate by now Tom?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>>>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20 years,
>>>>>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With
>>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames into
>>>>>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted --
>>>>>>>> > squashed
>>>>>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>>>>>> > good --
>>>>>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is enlarged
>>>>>>>> > onto
>>>>>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of
>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket
>>>>>>>> > holes,
>>>>>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image files
>>>>>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all frames
>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the
>>>>>>>> > film
>>>>>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the
>>>>>>>> > actual
>>>>>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

THIS IS THE FUTURE (below)

Your last reply sure sounded like it.

>> I'm not sure if theres a childrens edition, I'll get back to you.

I'll keep it on file for future use.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4699a60c$0$26579$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Do you REALLY think I give a shit Tom?
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:pvhmi.36591$LE1.23663@newsfe13.lga...
>> Do you REALLY wanna trade insults with me Sam???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:4698724b$0$844$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> I'm not sure if theres a childrens edition, I'll get back to you.
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Ql_li.20780$wG2.13209@newsfe17.lga...
>>>> Where can I read up on Your GOD???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:46986c73$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> We will never agree on this God business, you stick to your beliefs
>>>>> and I'll stick to mine.
>>>>> My God is a loving one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sam
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7YZli.20770$wG2.15633@newsfe17.lga...
>>>>>> Sam;
>>>>>> If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave
>>>>>> those who
>>>>>> Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>>>>>>>> It works for me every day.
>>>>>>>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse,
>>>>>>> doncha think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a
>>>>>>> plate by now Tom?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>>>>>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a
>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20
>>>>>>>>>> >years,
>>>>>>>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With
>>>>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames
>>>>>>>>>> > into
>>>>>>>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted --
>>>>>>>>>> > squashed
>>>>>>>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>>>>>>>> > good --
>>>>>>>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is
>>>>>>>>>> > enlarged onto
>>>>>>>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of
>>>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket
>>>>>>>>>> > holes,
>>>>>>>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image
>>>>>>>>>> > files
>>>>>>>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all
>>>>>>>>>> > frames that
>>>>>>>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the
>>>>>>>>>> > film
>>>>>>>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the
>>>>>>>>>> > actual
>>>>>>>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

Thet beats the Hell outta an "Abomination in the eyes of the Lord"

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4699c26a$0$13845$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:g2jmi.12142$Sb4.9619@newsfe21.lga...
>> I'm not one to say "I told you so".
>>
>> In this case I'll make an exception.
>>
>> I told you Yo(Momma)Harvey is a Criminal Lying
>> Faggot who FEARS evidence/testimony.
>
> Now theres that lovely christian sentiment shining through again. What a
> phoney.
>
>>
>> WHO is Spiffy?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1184435637.891692.214180@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>>>I just shows what a hypocritical piece of shit you really are. You
>>> took a complete article that was COPYRIGHTED and copied it off of a
>>> website and posted it here.
>>>
>>> You could have simply posted a link and given the author credit, but
>>> you didn't.
>>>
>>> It just proves how slimy you really are.
>>>
>>> The fact that I was able to once again out you as the fraud that you
>>> are makes my day. The fact that I found it that quickly should tell
>>> you something.
>>>
>>> Some of us "kooks" are a lot smarter than say, you.

ANOTHER WARNING below

Your claim that I think I'm anyone's Representative makes YOU "deluded".

All I do is post official evidence/testimony.

It's you LN's who RUN from it.

Last Warning.......
Continue the Insults & I'll Bury you with Insults.

Wanna try this one?>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469adf7b$0$19339$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Ipymi.12193$Sb4.5459@newsfe21.lga...
>> It figures that you cite a Discredited professor who sends his
>> adversaries
>> computer Viruses rather than debate evidence/testimony.
>
> Tom, you are deluded. McAdams doesn't consider you his adversary. You are
> a joke. You can't really believe that anyone takes you seriously. Hands up
> all Cters who think Tom would be a suitable representative for them in any
> JFK debate? Anyone? Hello? Anybody?...........................
>
>>
>> PROOF is HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
>>
>> A Discredited proffessor who STEALS student Tui