SAM BROWN

Welcome to Rogue's Gallery Sam

The dialogue between Sam & I began with this (below)

May I ask exactly what makes you believe in Oswald's guilt Sam?

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:465e3a20$0$28584$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Q077i.114169$NK5.85720@newsfe23.lga...
>> The fact that you didn't know the difference between criminal/civil cases
>> requirements.
>> Is why I questioned your citizenship.
>
> Well thats just plain silly Tom, Americans didnt invent the legal system,
> you are merely the most litigious.
> I think you'll find that the rules change from state to state in your
> country.
>
>>
>> You stste below that you believe in Oswald's guilt.
>
> Yes I do.
>
>>
>> Are you willing to adress evidence/testimony?
>
> Sure, but I'm not prepared to give weight to the silly myths that surround
> this case either. I am open to the possibility of a conspiracy but I think
> most of the theorys I've read about so far are downright ludicrous.
> Please Tom, dont ask me about Bakers different accounts of his encounter
> with Oswald as I consider this to be another irrelevance that stops
> discussion from getting to the real crux of the matter.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:465ced22$0$19665$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:vQ57i.114158$NK5.65175@newsfe23.lga...
>>>> "Preponderance of the evidence" is the Criteria for CIVIL Trials Sam.
>>>
>>> There was no trial Tom.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Criminal Trials require "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt to a moral
>>>> certainty".
>>>
>>> Yep and I believe Oswald to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Having
>>> said that I must reiterate that I am yet to be convince that he was not
>>> encouraged by others. I'm looking forward to reading Bugliosis book, to
>>> see if he will have a convincing argument for that.
>>>>
>>>> Are you a citizen of a Different Country?
>>>
>>> Yes, I am a citizen of both Australia and Great Britain. What is the
>>> relevance of your question?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:465ce2e2$0$19720$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:O4E6i.559034$Pi4.545845@newsfe14.lga...
>>>>>> No comment on the NEGATIVE parrifin test on Oswald's cheek?
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again Tom, the proponderance of the evidence points to Oswald as
>>>>> the shooter. The parafin test doesn't prove a damn thing one way or
>>>>> the other.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you insist on Oswalds innocence? I think perhaps you need to
>>>>> take a deep breath and try to consider the fact that the guy is in all
>>>>> probability a double murderer.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:465a6449$0$15974$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1qs6i.553683$Pi4.224846@newsfe14.lga...
>>>>>>>> Thank You Sam;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you aware that paraffin tests showed NEGATIVE on Oswald's
>>>>>>>> cheeks?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indicating he did NOT fire a rifle thast day?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you aware that the authorities Withheld/Altered/Destroyed
>>>>>>>> evicence & suborned Perjury?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know that there have been questions raised about various matters
>>>>>>> in the case but I still think the bulk of the evidence points to
>>>>>>> Oswald being the shooter. I am yet to be convinced that Oswald was
>>>>>>> not working in conjunction with others. I am also not convinced that
>>>>>>> he wasn't just another nutcase hoping to get his name in the papers
>>>>>>> either. After all he did seem to try quite hard to be noticed on
>>>>>>> quite a few occasions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm quite fascinated by the US in the 60's. I admit I don't have a
>>>>>>> lot of emotion invested in the assassination, its another watershed
>>>>>>> event in a decade that seems littered with them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4659228e$0$11985$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oswald lone gunman. Yep
>>>>>>>>> Conspiracy? Not sure.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:%O76i.317053$2Q1.191829@newsfe16.lga...
>>>>>>>>>> Sam;
>>>>>>>>>> Please tell us your position on the Assassination.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you believe in a Lone Assassin?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or, do you believe in a Conspiracy?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:4658eb13$0$2869$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:f3anje0fgc@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>> <1180154867.453991.280960@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> aeffects
>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On May 25, 7:39 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:f37dc402taq@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > In article <H5mdnZdoUNnHtcrbRVny...@pipex.net>, Clairybums
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>"cdddraftsman" <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>news:1180116059.223339.43040@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >><snipped>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I already addressed the issue that I could have used a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>better word than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>"entertainment"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I don't post as I don't feel that I have either knowledge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>or experience
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>enough to give a reasoned argument. I also don't come from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>the USA. I AM,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>however, very interested in history and crime and have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>reading this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>newsgroup for the past few years as I have an avid interest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>in the JFK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Assassination. I like to read from the American point of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>view.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Posts like yours detract from that and your new thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>here, addressed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>me, as if to try and embarrass me into an argument or to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>state whose side
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I'm on simply confirms my initial thoughts about you. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>off back to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>reading and will try to filter out your negative and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>abusive posts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>wherever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>possible. Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Claire McConville
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Try locating a "killfilter" setting on your newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > reader. It depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > on how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > you access the newsgroups. I use a paid service, so I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > filter out the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > trolls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > - but there are also many excellent free newsreaders that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > can filter out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > so you never see their posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It's a virtual necessity in this forum, as there are many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > who've sometimes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > honest enough to admit that their intent is to shut down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > any reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > debate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > on the JFK assassination.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Keep lurking... I'm sure that you'll enjoy the group once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > you get rid of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > trolls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And for Gods sake dont ever disagree with his Benship or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'll killfile you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How silly! LNT'ers who aren't trolls (or, for that matter,
>>>>>>>>>>>> CT'ers who are not
>>>>>>>>>>>> trolls) don't get killfiled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Only trolls.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Liar. You kill filed me because you were in the wrong. You have
>>>>>>>>>>> no idea of my position on the assassination. And you leave your
>>>>>>>>>>> pathetic little lapdog healy to defend you. Coward.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to see another female here however. Also another non
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> american, welcome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but dont expect much rational discussion here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course not... When LNT'ers are unable to respond to serious
>>>>>>>>>>>> points raised
>>>>>>>>>>>> about the evidence, and are unable in many cases to *CITE*,
>>>>>>>>>>>> there can be no
>>>>>>>>>>>> "rational" discussion. Particularly when those such as
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugliosi simply labels
>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone who fails to believe the WCR as a "kook". There is no
>>>>>>>>>>>> "rational"
>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion where ad hominem reigns supreme.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yawn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>nor believe you're of the female type....

as you can see, the Insults originated with Sam

I wonder if she realizes that her "Name-Calling" opens the door for others
to RETALIATE?

"Bud" <sirslick@fast.net> wrote in message
news:1180990075.422285.271980@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> aeffects wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> > "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>> >
>> > news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>> > > Marsh
>> > > says...
>> >
>> > >>Bud wrote:
>> > >>> Speed wrote:
>> > >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my question
>> > >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>> > >>>> Here
>> > >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>> >
>> > >>>    Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>> > >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>> > >>> prior
>> >
>> > >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were changes.
>> >
>> > >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a conspirator,
>> >
>> > >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning
>> > >>the
>> > >>assassination.
>> >
>> > > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>> > > why
>> > > Tony
>> > > tries to make this point.
>> >
>> > > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>> > > is...
>> >
>> > They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>> > Dickhead.
>>
>> oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>
>   I thought when she said "Dickhead", she was only giving you notice
> that it was your turn to comment.
>
>> > >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>> > >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>> > >>> dissuade
>> > >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>> >
>> > >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>> > >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>> > >>>> understood we
>> > >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>> > >>>> We
>> > >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you probably
>> > >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>> > >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>> > >>>> truck.
>> > >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>> > >>>> was
>> > >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news nature...and
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish the
>> > >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the ground,
>> > >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>> > >>>> cars
>> > >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>> > >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor view
>> > >>>> of
>> > >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade started."
>> > >>>> The
>> > >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been changed.
>> >
>> > >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>> > >>>> 1993,
>> > >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>> > >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>> >
>> > >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom always
>> > >>>> was
>> > >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>> > >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>> > >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>> > >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it was
>> > >>>> canceled."
>> >
>> > >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and photographers
>> > >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>> > >>>> House
>> > >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>> > >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>> > >>>> 21,
>> > >>>> 1963.
>> >
>> > >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>> > >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>> > >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>> > >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>> > >>>> shoved
>> > >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>> > >>>> was
>> > >>>> too late."
>> >
>> > >>>    The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>> > >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>> > >>> portruding
>> > >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>> > >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>> > >>> everyone in Dallas.
>> >
>> > >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>> > >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured
>> > >>an
>> > >>image of the rifle being fired.
>

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180973169.797954.24900@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 3:25 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> "RICLAND" <blackwr...@lycos.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:oqydnfRKoqBcFP7bnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> > Kenneth A. Rahn wrote:
>> >> Ricland, is there something seriously wrong with you? Pat Lambert is
>> >> traveling now, without access to the Internet.
>>
>> >> Ken Rahn
>>
>> > No disrespect, Ken. Just doing my job.
>>
>> WTF???? Are you mad? Who employs you? It's not your job you pompous fool
>> ,
>> it's your hobby.
>>
>>
>>
>> > It was your comment about her not having internet access because she's
>> > going away for weeks that did it.
>>
>> Why? What is so hard to believe about this?
>>
>>
>>
>> > Of course that's an insult to our intelligence. Where can she possibly
>> > be
>> > going where she doesn't have access to the internet?
>>
>> Any number of places. She is NOT obliged to reveal her whereabouts to
>> anyone, least of all you.
>>
>>
>>
>> > My sense is that she's not being completely forthcoming with you, that
>> > she's stalling.
>>
>> Now theres a surprise. Sinister isn't it? She's sitting in her living
>> room,
>> curtains drawn, lights out and phone unplugged, a loaded 38 in one hand
>> and
>> a tumbler of whiskey in the other. Tell me Ric, ever feel afraid to leave
>> the house?You should they're all out to get you. Kook
>>
>
> something tells me ole Sammy boyo isn't a CT.... LMFAO! moron......

Shows how crap your powers of deduction are doesn't it Healy? I don't know
if there was a conspiracy. I do believe that Oswald was the gunman. Oh and
once again I am a female. I know this confuses you as you only have Ben as a
reference point. And don't you know its rude to speak with your mouth full?

>
>
>>
>> > This thing must be dealt with now. She should have dropped what she was
>> > doing and fired off a post explaining why her fingerprints are all over
>> > Vinny's Garrison chapter.
>>
>> > She should have done that immediately.
>>
>> Oh Grow up Ricland. She has a life and is entitled to spend her time in
>> anyway she sees fit.
>>
>>
>>
>> > ricland
>>
>> > --
>> > "Vince Bugliosi wrote "99.9%" of the book himself. He confirmed this on
>> > a radio or TV interview this month."
>> > --David Von Pein 6/3/07
>>
>> > Reclaiming History -- The Rebuttals
>> > The Rebuttals to Bugliosi's JFK Assassination Book
>> >http://jfkhit.com
>
>

Above her insults start becoming sexual

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180994985.967672.168410@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 3:02 pm, chuck schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 11:38 am, aeffects <aeffe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hell, I'm going to give you 5 stars too.....5 stars for FAILURE to
>> > deal with reality....LMFAO!
>>
>> OK, where are my five stars?
>>
>>
>>
>> > So Chuckie daShoe.... does it look like there's any Conspiracy let up
>> > hereabouts? Does it look and sound like the CT cause has went up in
>> > flames....
>>
>> No. There will always be a conspriacy POV regarding this case. It's a
>> religion based on faith and belief and not facts.
>>
>
> here all along I thought only the Warranistas had a lock on JFK/WCR
> religion
>
>>
>> > You moron Bugliosi and his book went into the tank... explain THAT
>> > away.... Yo and your ilk failed, A G A I N!
>>
>> Interest in the case is waning, but his book is/has sold respectable
>> numbers, Healy.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Where's our resident Bugliosi idolator Von Pein, btw? Taking a
>> > *seppuku* class?-
>>
>> He's probably wondering why he even bothers to trade jibes with mental
>> midgets like you.
>>
>> Do you even have a theory? Mr. Mustard in the library with the
>> candlestick? Professor Plum in the study with the rope?
>
> get your head outt'a your ass, speak Englisha.....
>
>
>> Come up with something...anything. 44 years is plenty of time to
>> figure it out.
>
> have, so wake up douche bag.... the Zapruder film was altered, that's
> all I need, 6 years and counting little feller --
>
> How do YOU spell C O N S P I R A C Y?????

How do you spell FITZGERALD????? Seems to me anyone who confuses it with
FRANCIS should probably stick to servicing Ben. Knobend.
>
>

Above, she spews her Venom on ANYONE

She thought I was Great Here below

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180986989.699856.290640@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 11:19 am, Ben Holmes <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote:
>> In article <1180978323.170996.274...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>> aeffects
>> says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> >> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>
>> >> > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>> >> > Marsh
>> >> > says...
>>
>> >> >>Bud wrote:
>> >> >>> Speed wrote:
>> >> >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my
>> >> >>>> question
>> >> >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>> >> >>>> Here
>> >> >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>
>> >> >>> Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>> >> >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>> >> >>> prior
>>
>> >> >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were
>> >> >>changes.
>>
>> >> >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a
>> >> >>> conspirator,
>>
>> >> >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning
>> >> >>the
>> >> >>assassination.
>>
>> >> > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>> >> > why
>> >> > Tony tries to make this point.
>>
>> >> > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>> >> > is...
>>
>> >> They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>> >> Dickhead.
>>
>> >oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>>
>> There's far too many things to spend time on in this short life, to
>> bother
>> reading such trolls... Sam was killfiled, you really should do the same!
>
> I believe your correct--point taken and will follow the advice...

Of Course you will you pointless little sycophant. Tomln has more cred than
you, at least he thinks for himself.
Bye Bye you'll be missed whatsamacallit.

>
>
>> Sam's only purpose is to demonstrate the character divide between CT'ers
>> and
>> LNT'ers... for lurkers who are beginning to learn the facts about the
>> assassination.
>>
>> >> >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>> >> >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>> >> >>> dissuade
>> >> >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>
>> >> >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>> >> >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>> >> >>>> understood we
>> >> >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>> >> >>>> We
>> >> >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you
>> >> >>>> probably
>> >> >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>> >> >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>> >> >>>> truck.
>> >> >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>> >> >>>> was
>> >> >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news
>> >> >>>> nature...and the
>> >> >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish
>> >> >>>> the
>> >> >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the
>> >> >>>> ground,
>> >> >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>> >> >>>> cars
>> >> >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>> >> >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor
>> >> >>>> view of
>> >> >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade
>> >> >>>> started." The
>> >> >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been
>> >> >>>> changed.
>>
>> >> >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>> >> >>>> 1993,
>> >> >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at
>> >> >>>> the
>> >> >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>> >> >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>
>> >> >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom
>> >> >>>> always was
>> >> >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>> >> >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>> >> >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>> >> >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>> >> >>>> the
>> >> >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it
>> >> >>>> was
>> >> >>>> canceled."
>>
>> >> >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and
>> >> >>>> photographers
>> >> >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>> >> >>>> House
>> >> >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>> >> >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>> >> >>>> 21,
>> >> >>>> 1963.
>>
>> >> >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>> >> >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>> >> >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>> >> >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>> >> >>>> shoved
>> >> >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>> >> >>>> was
>> >> >>>> too late."
>>
>> >> >>> The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>> >> >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>> >> >>> portruding
>> >> >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>> >> >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>> >> >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>
>> >> >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>> >> >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured
>> >> >>an
>> >> >>image of the rifle being fired.

"Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
news:f41l4601mnd@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <1180978323.170996.274540@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> aeffects
> says...
>>
>>On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>>> > Marsh
>>> > says...
>>>
>>> >>Bud wrote:
>>> >>> Speed wrote:
>>> >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my question
>>> >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>>> >>>> Here
>>> >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>>
>>> >>> Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>>> >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>>> >>> prior
>>>
>>> >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were changes.
>>>
>>> >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a conspirator,
>>>
>>> >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning the
>>> >>assassination.
>>>
>>> > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>>> > why
>>> > Tony tries to make this point.
>>>
>>> > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>>> > is...
>>>
>>> They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>>> Dickhead.
>>
>>oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>
>
> There's far too many things to spend time on in this short life, to bother
> reading such trolls... Sam was killfiled, you really should do the same!
>
> Sam's only purpose is to demonstrate the character divide between CT'ers
> and
> LNT'ers... for lurkers who are beginning to learn the facts about the
> assassination.

And yor only purpose is to illustrate how SOME CT Kooks get far too
emotional about the topic to be rational. Now continue with your verbal
masterbation.
>
>
>
>>> >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>>> >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>>> >>> dissuade
>>> >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>>
>>> >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>>> >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I understood
>>> >>>> we
>>> >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>>> >>>> We
>>> >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you probably
>>> >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>>> >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>>> >>>> truck.
>>> >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>>> >>>> was
>>> >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news nature...and
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish the
>>> >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the ground,
>>> >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>>> >>>> cars
>>> >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>>> >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor view
>>> >>>> of
>>> >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade started."
>>> >>>> The
>>> >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been changed.
>>>
>>> >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>>> >>>> 1993,
>>> >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at the
>>> >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>>> >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>>
>>> >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom always
>>> >>>> was
>>> >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>>> >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>>> >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>>> >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it was
>>> >>>> canceled."
>>>
>>> >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and photographers
>>> >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>>> >>>> House
>>> >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>>> >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>>> >>>> 21,
>>> >>>> 1963.
>>>
>>> >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>>> >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>>> >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>>> >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>>> >>>> shoved
>>> >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>>> >>>> was
>>> >>>> too late."
>>>
>>> >>> The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>>> >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>>> >>> portruding
>>> >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>>> >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>>> >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>>
>>> >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>>> >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured an
>>> >>image of the rifle being fired.

HERE is the Curteous Warning...

"tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
news:37%8i.18244$gM1.7750@newsfe21.lga...
>I wonder if she realizes that her "Name-Calling" opens the door for others
>to RETALIATE?

Oh Tom, say it isn't so. I didn't insult you. As I said in an earlier post I
place your opinion WAAAYYYY above Healy and Benny the dwarfs(love that
term). Healy is a mindless sycophant and Ben is a narcissist with a small
penis.

> "Bud" <sirslick@fast.net> wrote in message
> news:1180990075.422285.271980@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> aeffects wrote:
>>> On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> > "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>> >
>>> > news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>, Anthony
>>> > > Marsh
>>> > > says...
>>> >
>>> > >>Bud wrote:
>>> > >>> Speed wrote:
>>> > >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my
>>> > >>>> question
>>> > >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the motorcade.
>>> > >>>> Here
>>> > >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>> >
>>> > >>>    Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person who
>>> > >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person had
>>> > >>> prior
>>> >
>>> > >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were
>>> > >>changes.
>>> >
>>> > >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a
>>> > >>> conspirator,
>>> >
>>> > >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with planning
>>> > >>the
>>> > >>assassination.
>>> >
>>> > > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may wonder
>>> > > why
>>> > > Tony
>>> > > tries to make this point.
>>> >
>>> > > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing, that
>>> > > is...
>>> >
>>> > They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand clothing.
>>> > Dickhead.
>>>
>>> oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here yet!
>>
>>   I thought when she said "Dickhead", she was only giving you notice
>> that it was your turn to comment.
>>
>>> > >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling this
>>> > >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>>> > >>> dissuade
>>> > >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere. Get on
>>> > >>> the
>>> > >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>> >
>>> > >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the Warren
>>> > >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>>> > >>>> understood we
>>> > >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the President].
>>> > >>>> We
>>> > >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you
>>> > >>>> probably
>>> > >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things and
>>> > >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with the
>>> > >>>> truck.
>>> > >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car that I
>>> > >>>> was
>>> > >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news
>>> > >>>> nature...and the
>>> > >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only distinguish
>>> > >>>> the
>>> > >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the
>>> > >>>> ground,
>>> > >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in the
>>> > >>>> cars
>>> > >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty well
>>> > >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor
>>> > >>>> view of
>>> > >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade
>>> > >>>> started." The
>>> > >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been
>>> > >>>> changed.
>>> >
>>> > >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November 20,
>>> > >>>> 1993,
>>> > >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled at
>>> > >>>> the
>>> > >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>>> > >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>> >
>>> > >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom
>>> > >>>> always was
>>> > >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>>> > >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was standard
>>> > >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the selected
>>> > >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was understood
>>> > >>>> the
>>> > >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment it
>>> > >>>> was
>>> > >>>> canceled."
>>> >
>>> > >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and
>>> > >>>> photographers
>>> > >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including White
>>> > >>>> House
>>> > >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>>> > >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including November
>>> > >>>> 21,
>>> > >>>> 1963.
>>> >
>>> > >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in the
>>> > >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House pool
>>> > >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on that
>>> > >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>>> > >>>> shoved
>>> > >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested, but it
>>> > >>>> was
>>> > >>>> too late."
>>> >
>>> > >>>    The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on film
>>> > >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>>> > >>> portruding
>>> > >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of the
>>> > >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just about
>>> > >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>> >
>>> > >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that the
>>> > >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer captured
>>> > >>an
>>> > >>image of the rifle being fired.

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180992818.889123.86660@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 1:43 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>> aeffects wrote:
>> > On Jun 4, 11:19 am, Ben Holmes <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote:
>> > > In article <1180978323.170996.274...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>> > > aeffects
>> > > says...
>>
>> > > >On Jun 4, 2:32 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> > > >> "Ben Holmes" <bnhol...@rain.org> wrote in message
>>
>> > > >>news:f3vcub06um@drn.newsguy.com...
>>
>> > > >> > In article <L4CdnezwkN39mv7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vn...@comcast.com>,
>> > > >> > Anthony Marsh
>> > > >> > says...
>>
>> > > >> >>Bud wrote:
>> > > >> >>> Speed wrote:
>> > > >> >>>> I see the lone-nutters abandoned any attempt to answer my
>> > > >> >>>> question
>> > > >> >>>> about the last-minute switch of the press car in the
>> > > >> >>>> motorcade. Here
>> > > >> >>>> it is again, if they feel brave:
>>
>> > > >> >>>    Heres a novel approach, kook. Get the name of the person
>> > > >> >>> who
>> > > >> >>> ordered the switch, and if you are correct, and that person
>> > > >> >>> had prior
>>
>> > > >> >>It is not necessary to know the name to know that there were
>> > > >> >>changes.
>>
>> > > >> >>> knowledge of the assassination, you have the name of a
>> > > >> >>> conspirator,
>>
>> > > >> >>The changing of the motorcade may have nothing to do with
>> > > >> >>planning the
>> > > >> >>assassination.
>>
>> > > >> > Since it *greatly* facilitated the assassination, lurkers may
>> > > >> > wonder why
>> > > >> > Tony tries to make this point.
>>
>> > > >> > Lurkers who don't know that Tony is a LNT'er in CT'er clothing,
>> > > >> > that is...
>>
>> > > >> They should also know that Ben is a simpleton in second hand
>> > > >> clothing.
>> > > >> Dickhead.
>>
>> > > >oh---- what-a-nasty bitch, LMAO, she may serve some purpose here
>> > > >yet!
>>
>> > > There's far too many things to spend time on in this short life, to
>> > > bother
>> > > reading such trolls... Sam was killfiled, you really should do the
>> > > same!
>>
>> > I believe your correct--point taken and will follow the advice...
>>
>>    <snicker> Just say the word, Ben, and Healy will light his
>> genitals on fire.
>
> gawd its balls you fucking idiot... not that you wingnut, tin-foil
> beannie north of the Charles River over-educated morons know what
> balls are used for... I bet you still read PlayGirl & Hustler (in that
> order), don't ya? <snort-snort>

Oh dear, perhaps it's time to shut your yap. Not too quickly! Give Ben a
chance to withdraw! That was probably the worst response I have ever seen
from you Healy.

>
>
>> > > Sam's only purpose is to demonstrate the character divide between
>> > > CT'ers and
>> > > LNT'ers... for lurkers who are beginning to learn the facts about the
>> > > assassination.
>>
>> > > >> >>> and from that person, you can proceed to others, unraveling
>> > > >> >>> this
>> > > >> >>> conspiracy you imagine. Kooks demanding that rational people
>> > > >> >>> dissuade
>> > > >> >>> you of your suspicions is boring, and really leads nowhere.
>> > > >> >>> Get on the
>> > > >> >>> trail of those conspirators, time is slipping away!
>>
>> > > >> >>>> Dallas Morning News reporter Tom Dillard testified to the
>> > > >> >>>> Warren
>> > > >> >>>> Commission: "We lost our position out at the airport. I
>> > > >> >>>> understood we
>> > > >> >>>> were supposed to have been quite a bit closer [to the
>> > > >> >>>> President]. We
>> > > >> >>>> were assigned as the prime photographic car which, as you
>> > > >> >>>> probably
>> > > >> >>>> know, normally a truck precedes the President on these things
>> > > >> >>>> and
>> > > >> >>>> certain representatives of the photographic press ride with
>> > > >> >>>> the truck.
>> > > >> >>>> In this case, as you know, we didn't have any and this car
>> > > >> >>>> that I was
>> > > >> >>>> in was to take any photographs which was of spot-news
>> > > >> >>>> nature...and the
>> > > >> >>>> whole parade, the whole trip to town, I could only
>> > > >> >>>> distinguish the
>> > > >> >>>> President's car on very few occasions in high rises in the
>> > > >> >>>> ground,
>> > > >> >>>> when we got on hills. It was difficult because the people in
>> > > >> >>>> the cars
>> > > >> >>>> ahead of me were sitting on the backs of cars which pretty
>> > > >> >>>> well
>> > > >> >>>> covered the President's car for me. We had a very, very poor
>> > > >> >>>> view of
>> > > >> >>>> the President's car at any time from the time the parade
>> > > >> >>>> started." The
>> > > >> >>>> WC didn't ask him if he knew why the car's order had been
>> > > >> >>>> changed.
>>
>> > > >> >>>> Dillard forcefully said the same thing on C-Span on November
>> > > >> >>>> 20, 1993,
>> > > >> >>>> telling the TV audience that the flatbed truck was "canceled
>> > > >> >>>> at the
>> > > >> >>>> last minute" and that the photographers were put in Chevrolet
>> > > >> >>>> convertibles "which totally put us out of the picture".
>>
>> > > >> >>>> Dillard later said: "The sad thing news-wise was the custom
>> > > >> >>>> always was
>> > > >> >>>> that a selected group of press people [photographers] were to
>> > > >> >>>> ride a flatbed truck in front of the president. That was
>> > > >> >>>> standard
>> > > >> >>>> procedure in all presidential parades. I was one of the
>> > > >> >>>> selected
>> > > >> >>>> photographers. I was the head man at my paper...It was
>> > > >> >>>> understood the
>> > > >> >>>> flatbed truck was going to be there. But at the last moment
>> > > >> >>>> it was
>> > > >> >>>> canceled."
>>
>> > > >> >>>> All previous trips, including Florida, had press and
>> > > >> >>>> photographers
>> > > >> >>>> very close in front and behind JFK's limousine, including
>> > > >> >>>> White House
>> > > >> >>>> photographer Cecil Stoughton, who rode in the Secret
>> > > >> >>>> Service follow-up car from July 1963 until and including
>> > > >> >>>> November 21,
>> > > >> >>>> 1963.
>>
>> > > >> >>>> AP photographer Henry Burroughs, who rode in Camera Car #2 in
>> > > >> >>>> the
>> > > >> >>>> Dallas motorcade, wrote: "I was a member of the White House
>> > > >> >>>> pool
>> > > >> >>>> aboard Air Force One when we arrived with JFK in Dallas on
>> > > >> >>>> that
>> > > >> >>>> fateful day. We, the pool, were dismayed to find our pool car
>> > > >> >>>> shoved
>> > > >> >>>> back to about #11 position in the motorcade. We protested,
>> > > >> >>>> but it was
>> > > >> >>>> too late."
>>
>> > > >> >>>    The press car was in excellent position to capture Oz on
>> > > >> >>> film
>> > > >> >>> shooting JFK from the TSBD, some saw the barrel of the gun
>> > > >> >>> portruding
>> > > >> >>> from that building. They just didn`t, probably on orders of
>> > > >> >>> the
>> > > >> >>> conspirators. Hundreds of people got orders that day, just
>> > > >> >>> about
>> > > >> >>> everyone in Dallas.
>>
>> > > >> >>And explain how the cameramen in the camera knew beforehand that
>> > > >> >>the
>> > > >> >>rifle would be in the TSBD and explain why no photographer
>> > > >> >>captured an
>> > > >> >>image of the rifle being fired.

INTRODUCE "LEZBO" HERE>>> (by Sam)

"aeffects" <aeffects@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181097655.893124.119070@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 5, 7:20 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> <ecag...@tx.rr.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1181081212.397138.91220@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > DVP True Story re The QuestionMan Healy:
>> > I badgered him for 2, 3 days to post his
>> > "conspiracy theory".. Perhaps 6-8 times..
>> > I even humilated him by pointing out he
>> > was a CTer sans the CT. Finally The Q Man
>> > stepped forward and presented his (har-har)
>> > "conspiracy theory":
>>
>> >             ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>> > "We've got a conspiracy here!!! What are YOU
>> > going to do about it?"
>> >   -Question Man Healy explaining his CT OFF
>> >             ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>>
>> > (THIS was David Healy's "conspiracy theory.)
>>
>> >             MR :~? ED
>>
>> Perhaps he's waiting for Ben to tell him what the conspiracy was. We all
>> know independent thought is beyond
>> the poor wee mite.
>>
>
> Love you too, snookum's. Certainly hope you have more men in your
> miserable life than what you find here. I doubt it, however!

There are plenty of Men here silly! You are just not one of them.
Anyway like you I am a big homo. Yes that's right, big lesbo! Any other
questions?

>
> So, what's the story with Z-132/133?

You tell me.
>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 5, 6:21 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> What's the "evidence" you're talking about, David H.?
>>
>> >> You NEVER present anything. Period.
>>
>> >> And even if you DID present anything, you cannot possibly present any
>> >> hard physical evidence pointing toward conspiracy....because none
>> >> exists. Period.
>>
>> >> You have no bullets leading to a plot.
>> >> You have no guns.
>> >> You have no witnesses who saw anyone with a gun other than an Oswald-
>> >> like person with a gun.
>> >> You have no bullet shells.
>> >> You have no fingerprints either. (And I love what Vince Bugliosi does
>> >> to Mac Wallace in his book. He talked to the man who compared the
>> >> supposed "Wallace box print". You want me to tell you what the result
>> >> was? It's a howl. .... I'll let you look it up....if you dare read
>> >> RH.)
>>
>> >> Simple question.....
>>
>> >> Why don't you think all of the above is even the slightest bit ODD if
>> >> the multi-gun conspiracy you aspire to really occurred?
>>
>> >> The only evidence points to Oswald. And the only thing you can
>> >> possibly hang your hat on is guesswork that somebody put Oswald up to
>> >> it. And even that is weaker than 20-year-old coffee.
>>
>> >> Why not just admit you're wrong and start up another hobby? That's
>> >> easier than being embarrassed day after day by relying on nothing
>> >> substantive re. a conspiracy.

HER ATTITUDE SWITCHES HERE.

Sam;
Your use of the words "cherry-picking" is called "Reasonable Doubt" in the
Legal System.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:466618f0$0$994$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
> news:f44tdp082n@drn.newsguy.com...
>> In article <1181084645.742652.131460@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>> justme1952@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>>On Jun 5, 6:46 pm, cdddraftsman <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jun 5, 12:53 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > lowery admits that thew WCR is Phony.
>>>>
>>>> > So I guess you'll have to remove your web site off the net asshoe !
>>>>
>>>
>>>Tomnln,
>>>If the WCR is phoney then why do you constantly quote evidence/
>>>testimony (lord I've grown to hate those words it's all that ever
>>>comes out of his mouth) from it???? Your so confused you don't know
>>>what your talking about anymore. No surprises there....
>>
>> There's a big difference between the evidence that the WC put in it's 26
>> volumes
>> (despite evidence that's *missing* unaccountably from these volumes) and
>> the use
>> that the WCR made of them.
>>
>> For simple examples that anyone can follow, simply look up the series of
>> posts
>> entitled "Provable Lies of the Warren Commission" - where I look at the
>> evidence
>> that the WC published, then look at what they *said* they had.
>>
>> Unfortunately, most LNT'ers do indeed hate the evidence & testimony ...
>> for it
>> simply doesn't support their theories. (Note the plural)
>
> That's just fancy talk for "cherry picking" you are just too idiotic to
> realise it.

Sam;
Find it HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46663357$0$22416$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi Tom,
>
> I think its disgusting and innappropriate if true. I think lawyers have
> done much to sully their own reputations with this kind of behaviour. It
> is not unheard of. But can you offer me proof of it happening in this
> case? And would it, in and of itself prove Oswald innocent or that there
> was a definite conspiracy?
> Cheers
> Sam
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:xkq9i.49015$NU1.42356@newsfe13.lga...
>> Hi Sam;
>> How do you feel about a WC Lawyer suborning Perjury from a witness??
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46662f6b$0$17153$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:SVp9i.168003$mJ1.29547@newsfe22.lga...
>>>> Sam;
>>>> Your use of the words "cherry-picking" is called "Reasonable Doubt" in
>>>> the Legal System.
>>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> We'll have to agree to disagree here. I thinks its inconsistent to refer
>>> to WCR as a lie but somehow its ok as a cite when it does not preclude
>>> Oswald as the lone gunman or point to a possible conspiracy.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:466618f0$0$994$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ben Holmes" <bnholmes@rain.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:f44tdp082n@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>>>> In article <1181084645.742652.131460@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> justme1952@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jun 5, 6:46 pm, cdddraftsman <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 12:53 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > lowery admits that thew WCR is Phony.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > So I guess you'll have to remove your web site off the net asshoe
>>>>>>>> > !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tomnln,
>>>>>>>If the WCR is phoney then why do you constantly quote evidence/
>>>>>>>testimony (lord I've grown to hate those words it's all that ever
>>>>>>>comes out of his mouth) from it???? Your so confused you don't know
>>>>>>>what your talking about anymore. No surprises there....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's a big difference between the evidence that the WC put in it's
>>>>>> 26 volumes
>>>>>> (despite evidence that's *missing* unaccountably from these volumes)
>>>>>> and the use
>>>>>> that the WCR made of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For simple examples that anyone can follow, simply look up the series
>>>>>> of posts
>>>>>> entitled "Provable Lies of the Warren Commission" - where I look at
>>>>>> the evidence
>>>>>> that the WC published, then look at what they *said* they had.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, most LNT'ers do indeed hate the evidence & testimony
>>>>>> ... for it
>>>>>> simply doesn't support their theories. (Note the plural)
>>>>>
>>>>> That's just fancy talk for "cherry picking" you are just too idiotic
>>>>> to realise it.

Nobody has to get into insults like "big lezzo & carpet munching".

Scripture already did that in cleaner language.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469841ec$0$14405$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Doncha just love it when they start lecturing about hatred, and then start
> in on the homophobic insults. Priceless.
> Oh and Gil, its me Slammy who's the big queer. Congratulations on
> maintaining your lousy accuracy stats. Please feel free to launch into the
> "big lezzo" & "carpet munching" insults.
>
> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1184355244.503967.236300@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> the same hatreds, the same stupidity and the same body. He/she is a
>> gender bender. Str8 from the J Edna Hoover School for transvestites.
>>
Above Sam claims that Scripture is Homophobic.

Sam;
If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave those who
Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>> It works for me every day.
>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>
>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>
> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse, doncha
> think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a plate by now
> Tom?
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>
>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>
>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>
>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a time.
>>>>
>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20 years,
>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With the
>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames into
>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted -- squashed
>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>> > good --
>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is enlarged
>>>> > onto
>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of that
>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>
>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket holes,
>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image files
>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all frames
>>>> > that
>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the film
>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the actual
>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>
>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

MORE DENIAL FROM SAM

Where can I read up on Your GOD???

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46986c73$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Tom
>
> We will never agree on this God business, you stick to your beliefs and
> I'll stick to mine.
> My God is a loving one.
>
> Sam
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:7YZli.20770$wG2.15633@newsfe17.lga...
>> Sam;
>> If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave those
>> who
>> Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>>>> It works for me every day.
>>>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>>>
>>> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse, doncha
>>> think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a plate by now
>>> Tom?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20 years,
>>>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With the
>>>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames into
>>>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted -- squashed
>>>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>>>> > good --
>>>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is enlarged
>>>>>> > onto
>>>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of that
>>>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket
>>>>>> > holes,
>>>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image files
>>>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all frames
>>>>>> > that
>>>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the film
>>>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the
>>>>>> > actual
>>>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

START THE RIDE HERE>>>

Do you REALLY wanna trade insults with me Sam???

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4698724b$0$844$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> I'm not sure if theres a childrens edition, I'll get back to you.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Ql_li.20780$wG2.13209@newsfe17.lga...
>> Where can I read up on Your GOD???
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46986c73$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> We will never agree on this God business, you stick to your beliefs and
>>> I'll stick to mine.
>>> My God is a loving one.
>>>
>>> Sam
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:7YZli.20770$wG2.15633@newsfe17.lga...
>>>> Sam;
>>>> If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave
>>>> those who
>>>> Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>>>>>> It works for me every day.
>>>>>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>>>>>
>>>>> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse,
>>>>> doncha think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a
>>>>> plate by now Tom?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>>>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20 years,
>>>>>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With
>>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames into
>>>>>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted --
>>>>>>>> > squashed
>>>>>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>>>>>> > good --
>>>>>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is enlarged
>>>>>>>> > onto
>>>>>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of
>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket
>>>>>>>> > holes,
>>>>>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image files
>>>>>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all frames
>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the
>>>>>>>> > film
>>>>>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the
>>>>>>>> > actual
>>>>>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

THIS IS THE FUTURE (below)

Your last reply sure sounded like it.

>> I'm not sure if theres a childrens edition, I'll get back to you.

I'll keep it on file for future use.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4699a60c$0$26579$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Do you REALLY think I give a shit Tom?
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:pvhmi.36591$LE1.23663@newsfe13.lga...
>> Do you REALLY wanna trade insults with me Sam???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:4698724b$0$844$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> I'm not sure if theres a childrens edition, I'll get back to you.
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Ql_li.20780$wG2.13209@newsfe17.lga...
>>>> Where can I read up on Your GOD???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:46986c73$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> We will never agree on this God business, you stick to your beliefs
>>>>> and I'll stick to mine.
>>>>> My God is a loving one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sam
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7YZli.20770$wG2.15633@newsfe17.lga...
>>>>>> Sam;
>>>>>> If you knew anything about GOD you would realize that HE even gave
>>>>>> those who
>>>>>> Choose to become Abominations the gift of Choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:46985033$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:h8Yli.20725$wG2.12594@newsfe17.lga...
>>>>>>>> It works for me every day.
>>>>>>>> It works for those I send it to every day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe GOD interceded in your case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OOOhhhhhh! Scary capitalisation. If God really gave a rats arse,
>>>>>>> doncha think she'd have handed you the mythical conspirators on a
>>>>>>> plate by now Tom?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:1184384494.914450.10640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 11:24 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/film/Zapruderstable.mov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This Z film starts in Motion. (Clear, made from the original)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hit your space bar & it Stops.
>>>>>>>>>> Starts/Stops every time you hit space bar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In Stop position use arrow keys to Forward/Back 1 frame at a
>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "SteveF" <steve...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:139fd896f26mp68@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >I have been studying Zapruder's film off and on for over 20
>>>>>>>>>> >years,
>>>>>>>>>> > and recently bought the DVD "Image of an Assassination". With
>>>>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>>>>> > video software I have, I was able to extract all the frames
>>>>>>>>>> > into
>>>>>>>>>> > image files. The problem is, 1) the image is distorted --
>>>>>>>>>> > squashed
>>>>>>>>>> > so that tall people look fat; and 2) the resolution is not very
>>>>>>>>>> > good --
>>>>>>>>>> > in the video story they tell at length how each frame is
>>>>>>>>>> > enlarged onto
>>>>>>>>>> > a 4x5 sheet of film, and that is scanned at 1600 dpi. None of
>>>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>>>> > extra detail gets through to the 720x480 pixel video frame.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > It was really great to see all that image between the sprocket
>>>>>>>>>> > holes,
>>>>>>>>>> > but does anyone know where one can obtain the actual image
>>>>>>>>>> > files
>>>>>>>>>> > (supposedly TIFF or GIF or some other image format) of all
>>>>>>>>>> > frames that
>>>>>>>>>> > were processed? I thought the whole reason for preserving the
>>>>>>>>>> > film
>>>>>>>>>> > digitally was so researchers didn't have to risk damaging the
>>>>>>>>>> > actual
>>>>>>>>>> > film. So are the digital images available?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > -- Steve F.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That link came from Wim Dankbaars site, no wonder it doesn't work.

Thet beats the Hell outta an "Abomination in the eyes of the Lord"

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4699c26a$0$13845$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:g2jmi.12142$Sb4.9619@newsfe21.lga...
>> I'm not one to say "I told you so".
>>
>> In this case I'll make an exception.
>>
>> I told you Yo(Momma)Harvey is a Criminal Lying
>> Faggot who FEARS evidence/testimony.
>
> Now theres that lovely christian sentiment shining through again. What a
> phoney.
>
>>
>> WHO is Spiffy?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1184435637.891692.214180@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>>>I just shows what a hypocritical piece of shit you really are. You
>>> took a complete article that was COPYRIGHTED and copied it off of a
>>> website and posted it here.
>>>
>>> You could have simply posted a link and given the author credit, but
>>> you didn't.
>>>
>>> It just proves how slimy you really are.
>>>
>>> The fact that I was able to once again out you as the fraud that you
>>> are makes my day. The fact that I found it that quickly should tell
>>> you something.
>>>
>>> Some of us "kooks" are a lot smarter than say, you.

ANOTHER WARNING below

Your claim that I think I'm anyone's Representative makes YOU "deluded".

All I do is post official evidence/testimony.

It's you LN's who RUN from it.

Last Warning.......
Continue the Insults & I'll Bury you with Insults.

Wanna try this one?>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469adf7b$0$19339$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Ipymi.12193$Sb4.5459@newsfe21.lga...
>> It figures that you cite a Discredited professor who sends his
>> adversaries
>> computer Viruses rather than debate evidence/testimony.
>
> Tom, you are deluded. McAdams doesn't consider you his adversary. You are
> a joke. You can't really believe that anyone takes you seriously. Hands up
> all Cters who think Tom would be a suitable representative for them in any
> JFK debate? Anyone? Hello? Anybody?...........................
>
>>
>> PROOF is HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
>>
>> A Discredited proffessor who STEALS student Tuition by Force-Teaching
>> Lies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1184502320.549677.71280@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jul 15, 2:25 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> Start with the THREE Alterations of the Wal;ker back yard photo.
>>>>
>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>>
>>>> "YoHarvey" <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:1184440314.297624.196270@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Each time Jesus, Holmes, Ricland, Healey et all post more untruths,
>>>> > we will bury you!! Let the games begin.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> Try reading this entire post moron.....NO evidence of these photos
>>> being altered. Once again you ignore the facts and stay suspended in
>>> that world of conspiracy you know and love so well.
>>> The only life you have nutsack...when conspiracy is over...so are
>>> YOU!
>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/infojfk/jfk6/hscbkyd.htm

Here ya go Sam>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469c52fb$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:S5Xmi.74663$tL1.69106@newsfe22.lga...
>> Lattimer was a Urologist (Penis Dr.) (lowery proposed to him)
>
> Your poor poor wife, you do know that girls have to go too doncha genius?
>
>
>>
>> Who actually claims to own a MC with the Serial Number 2677.
>> (Supposedly Oswald's rifle)
>>
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm

RETALIATION TIME below

Eat Another little Girl DYKE.

You woud really be better off addressing evidence/testimony.

http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469c54f7$0$7152$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Smoke another crack pipe Tom.
>
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:HQWmi.74657$tL1.12454@newsfe22.lga...
>> The Value of Opinions is based on the amount of information one has taken
>> in on a given subject.
>>
>> On the Kennedy Assassination, justme has NEVER address any issue of
>> evidence/testiomony.
>>
>> He limits his posts to personal insults until he gets the shit beat outta
>> him with insults.
>> (like pimping his kid sister @ $0.25 a whack)
>>
>> He'll NEVER address these>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/altering_evidence.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/altgens.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/gil_jesus_page.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/videopg.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/AUDIO%20PAGE.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/zapruder%20film.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/you_asked_for_it.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/autopsy.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/characters.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/croft_photo_with_anaylisis.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/VEITNAM.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/CIA.htm
>>
>>
>>
>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1184624285.416235.280510@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jul 16, 4:27 pm, MSwanberg <MSwanb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 13, 12:53 pm, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > > - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> > You have to claim evidence tampering for your
>>>> > conspiracy to exist. Is there proof? Of course
>>>> > not. The x-rays and photos have been verified
>>>> > by numerous authorities. You simply refuse
>>>> > to accept what Humes is saying. Scientifically
>>>> > speaking, JFK COULD ONLY HAVE BEEN
>>>> > shot from the behind. This is scientific fact.
>>>> > I actually agree (can't believe I'm saying this)
>>>> > with David Lifton. The body is "the best
>>>> > evidence". The body proves unconditionally
>>>> > that JFK was shot from behind and ONLY
>>>> > from behind.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> I think the big question is how does one define proof.
>>>>
>>>> If you define proof as something that has been officially sanctioned,
>>>> then no, all you will ever see is "proof" of no conspiracy.
>>>>
>>>> But if you define proof as a body of evidence that demonstrates and
>>>> supports a specific conclusion, then yeah, there is a lot of that kind
>>>> of proof to lead to the conclusion that JFK may very well have been
>>>> shot from the front. And there is also the same kind of proof that
>>>> the "officially-sanctioned" proof is mostly bogus.
>>>>
>>>> -Mike- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> Mike,
>>> Proof is not made up of speculation. Just because a number of people
>>> may agree with a theory does not prove it is correct. The CT community
>>> have come up with so many different scenerios of what happend since
>>> JFK's murder that they are starting to overlap. It's been a viscious
>>> circle for them for 44 years. 75% of Americans can agree there was a
>>> conspiracy, but there is still no proof.
>>> There is no other shooter, no other weapon etc. At this point in time
>>> it boils down to a matter of what you want to believe. You have 3
>>> choices:
>>> 1. Oswald is guilty and shot JFK on his own there was no conspiracy.
>>> This does not mean that
>>>   the gov't didn't coverup some vital information from the puplic due
>>> to national security.
>>> 2. There is a massive conspiracy involving hundreds of officials not
>>> to mention handfuls of innocent
>>>   people that witnessed JFK being shot. This is far fetched. After
>>> all these years someone would
>>>   have broken the silence. 44 years have gone by and there is still
>>> no concrete evidence.
>>>   (Nutsacks stfu, we don't need you posting your damn website again)
>>> 3. You can be a fence sitter...and probably remain that way until the
>>> day you die. Unless locked up
>>>   documents are released in our lifetime that will change history for
>>> everyone, there will never be
>>>   a new break through proving conspiracy.
>>> The choice is yours to make, by doing your own research and coming to
>>> your own conclusions.
>>> Some of the conspiracy theories out there are pretty convincing. But
>>> none of them are solid or proven beyond a reasonable doubt. I once
>>> considered conspiracy...until I learned more about Oswald and what he
>>> was capable of. He had the means, motive and was crazy enough to pull
>>> it off despite what the CT community says. That's my opinion.
>>> Good luck
>>> justme

Go for it you toothless little in-bred.

"tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
news:AUNmi.13256$Sb4.12336@newsfe21.lga...
> Your claim that I think I'm anyone's Representative makes YOU "deluded".
>
> All I do is post official evidence/testimony.
>
> It's you LN's who RUN from it.
>
> Last Warning.......
> Continue the Insults & I'll Bury you with Insults.
>
> Wanna try this one?>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>
>
>
>
>
> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:469adf7b$0$19339$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:Ipymi.12193$Sb4.5459@newsfe21.lga...
>>> It figures that you cite a Discredited professor who sends his
>>> adversaries
>>> computer Viruses rather than debate evidence/testimony.
>>
>> Tom, you are deluded. McAdams doesn't consider you his adversary. You are
>> a joke. You can't really believe that anyone takes you seriously. Hands
>> up all Cters who think Tom would be a suitable representative for them in
>> any JFK debate? Anyone? Hello? Anybody?...........................
>>
>>>
>>> PROOF is HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
>>>
>>> A Discredited proffessor who STEALS student Tuition by Force-Teaching
>>> Lies.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <justme1952@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1184502320.549677.71280@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Jul 15, 2:25 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> Start with the THREE Alterations of the Wal;ker back yard photo.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> "YoHarvey" <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:1184440314.297624.196270@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > Each time Jesus, Holmes, Ricland, Healey et all post more untruths,
>>>>> > we will bury you!! Let the games begin.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> Try reading this entire post moron.....NO evidence of these photos
>>>> being altered. Once again you ignore the facts and stay suspended in
>>>> that world of conspiracy you know and love so well.
>>>> The only life you have nutsack...when conspiracy is over...so are
>>>> YOU!
>>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/infojfk/jfk6/hscbkyd.htm

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

In addition to being a Little Girl Sucker, You're Also a KOOK-SUCKER! ! ! !

In the eyes of the ONLY real Judge....

You're an "Abomination".

Yer better off sticking with evidence/testimony>>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469c5611$0$18984$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:pZNmi.13258$Sb4.874@newsfe21.lga...
>> Tom is NOT trying to be anyone's spokesman.
>
> Do you always refer to yourself in the third person? Kook.
>
>>
>> Because you NEVER address evidence/testimony, are you trying to be
>> Satan's spokesman?
>
> Uh huh, now THAT has to be the most rational explanation. Dribbling idiot.
> <snip>

I only make you RUN from evidence/testimony>>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm

The fact that you're a DYKE only kills your credibility.
The fact that you're an ABOMINATION only kills your credibility.

Those two facts just show that your whole being is BACKWARDS.

Reminder>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469c5ace$0$14405$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Do you really think a toothless little in-bred like you could offend me?
> Sorry Tom, been called better names by far better people. Now back to
> decaying from age you sad old fart.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:k2Omi.13259$Sb4.2105@newsfe21.lga...
>> Ooooooh Profanity from a DYKE.
>
>>
>> No wonder nobody treats you like a Woman.
>>
>> The subject here is evidence/testimony.
>>
>> You prefer insults......you'll Get them.
>>
>> Along WITH Q's on evidence/testimony.
>>
>> YOU may be Easily led but, I'm NOT.
>>
>> START HERE>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:469ae1a5$0$1462$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:1fymi.12190$Sb4.2980@newsfe21.lga...
>>>> Thet beats the Hell outta an "Abomination in the eyes of the Lord"
>>>
>>> Bet the priest told you that while you were sucking his dick last week.
>>> And you Tom are an abomination in the eyes of humanity.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:4699c26a$0$13845$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:g2jmi.12142$Sb4.9619@newsfe21.lga...
>>>>>> I'm not one to say "I told you so".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case I'll make an exception.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I told you Yo(Momma)Harvey is a Criminal Lying
>>>>>> Faggot who FEARS evidence/testimony.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now theres that lovely christian sentiment shining through again. What
>>>>> a phoney.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHO is Spiffy?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1184435637.891692.214180@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>I just shows what a hypocritical piece of shit you really are. You
>>>>>>> took a complete article that was COPYRIGHTED and copied it off of a
>>>>>>> website and posted it here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You could have simply posted a link and given the author credit, but
>>>>>>> you didn't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It just proves how slimy you really are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact that I was able to once again out you as the fraud that you
>>>>>>> are makes my day. The fact that I found it that quickly should tell
>>>>>>> you something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some of us "kooks" are a lot smarter than say, you.

Are you here to address evidence/testimony or just attack CT's?
I Love BOTH.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469dafaf$0$29024$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> No Mohammed, now go diddle your grandkids, theres such a thing as family
> tradition you know.
> Best wishes
> Sam the dyke
> Carpet muncher
> Muff diver etc etc
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:wg5ni.77026$tL1.9192@newsfe22.lga...
>> You're Welcome "Abomination".
>>
>> Are you gonna respond to them?
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:469c5b92$0$14986$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> Thanks toothless.
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:ouYmi.269506$dC2.201152@newsfe13.lga...
>>>> Here ya go Sam>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:469c52fb$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:S5Xmi.74663$tL1.69106@newsfe22.lga...
>>>>>> Lattimer was a Urologist (Penis Dr.) (lowery proposed to him)
>>>>>
>>>>> Your poor poor wife, you do know that girls have to go too doncha
>>>>> genius?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who actually claims to own a MC with the Serial Number 2677.
>>>>>> (Supposedly Oswald's rifle)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469dabbf$0$14986$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:3G5ni.77039$tL1.49764@newsfe22.lga...
>>I only make you RUN from evidence/testimony>>>
>>http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>
>> The fact that you're a DYKE only kills your credibility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Does it? Whys that child molestor?

Scripture states that yoyu shall be cut off from your people & put to death.

You've been Rejected by your own Creator.
"Repentance" is always an option.

Then you may address evidence/testimony.>>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> The fact that you're an ABOMINATION only kills your credibility.
>
> You sound just like one of those Islamic Terrorist types. Why dont you do
> yourself a favour and strap a bomb to your chest at your next family get
> together. You are all from the shallow end of the gene pool. Mohammed Tom.
>
>>
>> Those two facts just show that your whole being is BACKWARDS.
>>
>> Reminder>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:469c5ace$0$14405$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> Do you really think a toothless little in-bred like you could offend me?
>>> Sorry Tom, been called better names by far better people. Now back to
>>> decaying from age you sad old fart.
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:k2Omi.13259$Sb4.2105@newsfe21.lga...
>>>> Ooooooh Profanity from a DYKE.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> No wonder nobody treats you like a Woman.
>>>>
>>>> The subject here is evidence/testimony.
>>>>
>>>> You prefer insults......you'll Get them.
>>>>
>>>> Along WITH Q's on evidence/testimony.
>>>>
>>>> YOU may be Easily led but, I'm NOT.
>>>>
>>>> START HERE>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:469ae1a5$0$1462$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1fymi.12190$Sb4.2980@newsfe21.lga...
>>>>>> Thet beats the Hell outta an "Abomination in the eyes of the Lord"
>>>>>
>>>>> Bet the priest told you that while you were sucking his dick last
>>>>> week. And you Tom are an abomination in the eyes of humanity.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:4699c26a$0$13845$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:g2jmi.12142$Sb4.9619@newsfe21.lga...
>>>>>>>> I'm not one to say "I told you so".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In this case I'll make an exception.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I told you Yo(Momma)Harvey is a Criminal Lying
>>>>>>>> Faggot who FEARS evidence/testimony.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now theres that lovely christian sentiment shining through again.
>>>>>>> What a phoney.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WHO is Spiffy?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:1184435637.891692.214180@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>I just shows what a hypocritical piece of shit you really are. You
>>>>>>>>> took a complete article that was COPYRIGHTED and copied it off of
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> website and posted it here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You could have simply posted a link and given the author credit,
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> you didn't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It just proves how slimy you really are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fact that I was able to once again out you as the fraud that
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> are makes my day. The fact that I found it that quickly should
>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>> you something.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some of us "kooks" are a lot smarter than say, you.

The saving Grace is that you won't ever have Grandkids.

TRY THESE>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469dada1$0$15276$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Kp5ni.77032$tL1.68812@newsfe22.lga...
>> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
>>
>> In addition to being a Little Girl Sucker, You're Also a KOOK-SUCKER! ! !
>> !
>
> Only if they're good lookin, and over the age of consent, unlike you. Stop
> rubbing up against your grandkids you toothless kiddy fiddler.
>>
>> In the eyes of the ONLY real Judge....
>
> Guess What Mohammed, it aint gonna be you.
>
>>
>> You're an "Abomination".
>
> God I hope so, Chester the child molestor.
>
>>
>> Yer better off sticking with evidence/testimony>>>
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:469c5611$0$18984$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:pZNmi.13258$Sb4.874@newsfe21.lga...
>>>> Tom is NOT trying to be anyone's spokesman.
>>>
>>> Do you always refer to yourself in the third person? Kook.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because you NEVER address evidence/testimony, are you trying to be
>>>> Satan's spokesman?
>>>
>>> Uh huh, now THAT has to be the most rational explanation. Dribbling
>>> idiot.
>>> <snip>

Even GOD Rejected you Loser.

Try these>>> ttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469ebfe2$0$10708$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> NO.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:ldsni.2853$2X6.149@newsfe19.lga...
>> Man am I GOOD.
>>
>>
>>
>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:Btgni.16$2X5.6@newsfe13.lga...
>>>I think the fatal shot came from YOUR Ass.
>>>
>>> You've had So Many Criminals/Murderers up there it could'a been any one
>>> of them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "cdddraftsman" <cdddraftsman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1184670953.128294.173590@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>     One person has a assassin shooting from the sewer drain , a
>>>> impossible shot , another from the grassy knoll , a equally
>>>> preposterous proposition , a sea of cars behind to block egress , a
>>>> man in a RR control tower watching from behind , a three o'clock
>>>> shooting position , the most disadvantages of all shot positions .
>>>>
>>>>     Yet another from the SS follow up car , expecting the naive to
>>>> believe that of the ten thousand possible places a errant shot could
>>>> of gone , it hits in the exact place LHO is trying to shoot at . There
>>>> is a proported firing position from the overpass , several more from
>>>> various locations along the picket fence , the Dal-Tex Building , top
>>>> and bottom and the TSBD left and right ?
>>>>
>>>>     Yet for all the opportunity's squandered to earn respect and the
>>>> money they've taken for books and video's , very few are
>>>> intellectually or morally inclined to spot the only position and
>>>> person who fits all the available evidence withot invoking extr-
>>>> ordinary circumstances , one Lee Harvey Oswald . How curious it is to
>>>> have everyone else but LHO shooting and still not have a mystery worth
>>>> it's salt .......................tl

GOD Rejects you because you're an ABOMINATION.

Hohoho

Try this one>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

This is about the JFK Assassination
NOT buy sam a ticket to Hell.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:469ec01d$0$31086$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Terrorist, religious fundamentalist, freakshow, bigot.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Mbsni.2852$2X6.74@newsfe19.lga...
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:469dabbf$0$14986$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:3G5ni.77039$tL1.49764@newsfe22.lga...
>>>>I only make you RUN from evidence/testimony>>>
>>>>http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>>>
>>>> The fact that you're a DYKE only kills your credibility.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Does it? Whys that child molestor?
>>
>> Scripture states that yoyu shall be cut off from your people & put to
>> death.
>>
>> You've been Rejected by your own Creator.
>> "Repentance" is always an option.
>>
>> Then you may address evidence/testimony.>>>
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> The fact that you're an ABOMINATION only kills your credibility.
>>>
>>> You sound just like one of those Islamic Terrorist types. Why dont you
>>> do yourself a favour and strap a bomb to your chest at your next family
>>> get together. You are all from the shallow end of the gene pool.
>>> Mohammed Tom.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Those two facts just show that your whole being is BACKWARDS.
>>>>
>>>> Reminder>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:469c5ace$0$14405$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>> Do you really think a toothless little in-bred like you could offend
>>>>> me? Sorry Tom, been called better names by far better people. Now back
>>>>> to decaying from age you sad old fart.

Sam didn't believe me & wanted ANOTHER Opinion>>>

Homosexuality is a form of idol worship. (Deut. 4:16)

"..they which commit such things are worthy of death" and those who
"have pleasure in them that do them" as well. (Rom 1:32)

Any practicing homosexual is on the highway to Hell.

Not my words:

Might I suggest you read Romans 1:21-32 and see a description of
yourself.

"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
John 8:32

"tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
news:kFCni.1897$Zn1.671@newsfe22.lga...
> Speaking of Homo's;
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/tom_lowery.htm
>
> Not to mention his Co-Conspirator Sam Admitted ABOMINATION.

Yeah thats me. Terrorist.

Ellen is a Woman with 4 kids (5 countin me)

You're a SHIM.

SHe hIM

Oh Yeah
You're an ABOMINATION TOO.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2b6ce$0$6925$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Did you ask Ellen?
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:u9qoi.1612$WP1.153@newsfe19.lga...
>> Dykes are very defensive.

>> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1185027479.888211.259370@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jul 21, 9:47 am, daytonac...@webtv.net (Neil Coburn) wrote:
>>>> I think Ruth Paine was a Den Mother.
>>>> Neil Coburn
>>>
>>> Neil, if you ever get to see that silly "trial" of Lee Harvey Oswald,
>>> pay attention to the cross-examination of Ruth Paine. She gets very
>>> defensive when Gary Spence starts probing into her personal
>>> relationship with Marina. She is visibly shaken and upset at this line
>>> of questioning and seems to have something to hide.
>>>
>>> Not a normal reaction from someone who is just a friend.

You cheap DYKE;

They ALL had to bring an 8 year old for your Brunch.

Wanna try this NOW?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm

Did you supply ALL the Dildo's?

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2b2be$0$18304$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:fEpoi.1011$WP1.910@newsfe19.lga...
>> After being Rejected by GOD;
>> What makes you think people will accept you?
>
> I have spent this weekend so far with 14 friends, its 11.30am Sunday. How
> many people have travelled two hours to visit you? Terrorist.
>
>>
>> Address this>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46a1d378$1$25982$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> Oh hurry up and die toothless.
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Cb3oi.23030$EZ1.22573@newsfe18.lga...
>>>> Wise Choice on Your part Martin;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Martin Shackelford" <mshack4@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:HjZni.38909$YL5.30676@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>I don't want to trade anything with an idiot who can't come up with
>>>>>anything better to do than
>>>>> to accuse a long-time conspiracy researcher of being a "WCR
>>>>> Apologist."
>>>>> What a maroon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:9zNni.2951$2X6.1063@newsfe19.lga...
>>>>>> Looks like I Hit a Nerve with the WCR Apologist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this indicate that you wanna trade insults with me Shack???
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Martin Shackelford" <mshack4@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:XjFni.9513$eY.6664@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>>> It seems that tomln doesn't know much about Islam either. He doesn't
>>>>>>> know the difference between Mohammed and Allah, though it is Allah
>>>>>>> who is essentially the same as Jehovah.
>>>>>>> He prefers to prattle on about another of his cherished myths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:qGzni.102991$aP2.1598@newsfe16.lga...
>>>>>>>> My GOD rose from the dead Sam.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your god Mohammed is STILL DEAD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TRY THESE>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
>>>>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:469ec1a7$0$14825$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>> You just like your Islamic fundamentalist friends can shove YOUR
>>>>>>>>> god up your arse. Bigot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:PArni.2835$2X6.1094@newsfe19.lga...
>>>>>>>>>> sam has been Rejected by his/her GOD by choosing to be a
>>>>>>>>>> ABOMINATION.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sam is here ONLY to change Focus OFF of the evidence testimony.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's WHY sam never addresses evidence/testimony.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
>>>>>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:469db481$0$30511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>>>> Tom is a notorious dribbling idiot Martin. He is mere background
>>>>>>>>>>> noise. Not unlike Holmes in a lot of respects.

SAM IS WRONG AGAIN

Dear DYKE;

The Jews Do Indeed believe in Christ.
They also believe he did the Miracles.

Most, just never believed he was the Son of GOD.

How many times have you been to the Holy Land?
(mecca maybe)

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2b199$0$29024$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> They dont believe in Christ Moron. So you are a hypocrite too.
> Haha.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:gHpoi.1058$WP1.66@newsfe19.lga...
>>I Never hated Jews.
>>
>> Jews are GOD's chosen people Dyke.
>>
>> Try this one>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46a1d377$1$25982$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:iKzni.103212$aP2.35644@newsfe16.lga...
>>>>I do NOT Lie
>>>> Glad to hear I terrorize you
>>>> Scripture is NOT Biggoted
>>>> Seeking Truth is NOT Traitor.
>>>>
>>>> You being Anti-Scripture puts YOU kin the Koran Camp Dyke.
>>>
>>> So that means you hate Jews too! Nazi Terrorist bigot freakshow. Go fuck
>>> your daughter some more.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, try these>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:469ec0df$0$14986$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>> Liar. Terrorist Bigot. Traitor. Go live in Iran with all the other
>>>>> religious nuts. You'd fit right in.
>>>>>
>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:FXrni.2845$2X6.2377@newsfe19.lga...
>>>>>> ONLY to those who try to defend the Crimes of the WCR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try inserting THESE in your FILTHY mouth>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/danrather.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/horne__report.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/RACE%20TO%20TSBD.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/single_bullet.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/media_page.htm
>>>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/orders_of_silence.htm
>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tramps.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:469db072$0$31086$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:m6ini.26$2X5.12@newsfe13.lga...
>>>>>>>>I really thought this woukld have attracted some concerned
>>>>>>>>Americasns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are retarded Mohammed. You should know. YOU are the terrorist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:wm6ni.77066$tL1.19315@newsfe22.lga...
>>>>>>>>> As of July 2007, we are told that the Terrorists are stronger now
>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>> Sept. 11, 2001.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We have already spent over 3,300 American LIVES.
>>>>>>>>> We have already spent $12 Billion per month for over 5 YEARS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As of July 2007, we are told that the Terrorists are stronger now
>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>> Sept. 11, 2001.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WHAT's WRONG with THis Picture???

You Really are Stumpier than a DUMP DYKE.

GO FOR IT>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2b256$0$29024$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> You really are dumber than a stump. Terrorist.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:R9woi.2201$WP1.2081@newsfe19.lga...
>> If the DYKE resad Scripture rather than the Koran she would have known
>> that
>> the Jews are GOD's Chosen People.
>>
>> .
>> If the DYKE had read the WCR she could address>>>
>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

GREAT way to Honor your Dad;

You Force him to Reject his daughter OR spend Eternity in Hell.

GREAT way to Honor your Dad;

Honor your Country by addressing evidence/testimony>>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2b973$0$12802$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> My father fought in WWII for me to be free of the tyranny that you
> advocate Gil. You are a nothing. An anomaly. You are illustrating
> perfectly why your views should be dismissed as so much nonsense. Please
> continue. You make it easier for LNers to destroy what little credibility
> you ever had. Thank you.
>
> "Gil Jesus" <gjjmail@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1185065757.822032.194800@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>> Under the guise of "Freedom of Religion", which none of us has ever
>> denied or said should be denied, the God-hating trolls seek to find
>> acceptance that will allow them to practice their "same-sex" religion--
>> homosexuality.
>>
>> There is no established religion ANYWHERE in the world that condones
>> or promotes homosexuality. In Islam, the penalty for engaging in
>> homosexual acts is death. In Catholicism, it is not allowed, evident
>> by the millions of dollars the Church has had to pay out to victims of
>> gay pedophile priests. They KNOW it's wrong.
>>
>> When God sent two angels into Sodom to remove Lot and his family, the
>> men of Sodom wanted the angels to have sex with. Lot offered his
>> virgin daughters, but the men insisted on having what they thought
>> were men (the angels) instead. (Genesis Chapter 19 )
>>
>> No man or woman, calling himself or herself a Christian, can condone
>> or support homosexuality because it is in CONFLICT with God's Word.
>> Either God's Word is in your heart or it isn't.
>>
>> This doesn't mean that Christians are called to hate the sinner. We
>> are called to love the sinner, but hate the sin.
>>
>> If a homosexual were drowning, who would you say cared for that person
>> more: the one who stood there and helplessly watch him/her drown, or
>> the one who threw that drowning homosexual a life preserver ?
>>
>> What I've posted here is scripture:
>>
>> Read Genesis 19
>> Read Romans Chapter 1
>>
>> Sex was given to mankind to allow us to feel the joy and love that God
>> has for us. God created opposite sexes for that purpose. The joining
>> of a man and woman as one flesh is symbolic of the uniting of Jesus
>> Christ (man) and his church (woman). God even directs husbands to love
>> their wives as Christ loves the church and for wives to be obedient
>> and faithful to their husbands as the church is to Christ.
>>
>> And now you know why God was so angry with Sodom and Gemorrah. The
>> practicing of same-sex acts not only perverts the natural order, it
>> also makes a mockery of Jesus' return for his church.
>>
>> But there is a way out. There is a way to escape the bondage of
>> homosexuality and the chains of sin. There is a love without shame. (I
>> Corinthians Ch 13)
>>
>> There is one who loves you so much that he died for you on the cross,
>> he paid the price for your sins, past, present, and future.
>>
>> Read about what GOD'S lamb did for you. It's not too late to call on
>> His name and claim victory by His blood.
>>
>> Read John 3:3, John 3:16. Romans 10:9.
>>
>> This message was brought to you in Jesus' name by a repentent sinner.

Oh how Quickly you Forget.

You don't know the difference between Man/Woman.

Like your Faggot friend Yo(Momma)Harvey.
He don't know the difference between an Entrance/Exit hole.

Neither one of you will address evidence from YOUR Report>>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2de01$0$6925$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:H1Boi.427$hs1.12@newsfe13.lga...
>> The ABOMINATIONS made personal attacks rather than address
>> evidence/testimony.
>>
>> So, I RETALIATED against the Admitted DYKE.
>
> WELL,if thats not a good THATS A GOOD EXCUSE FOR weird capitilisation THEN
> I'M Tomlns THIRD Nipple!

AIDS knows NO Age DYKE.

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2dbfd$0$13888$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Yeah? But I'm still young Terrorist. Just turned 39 and I'm damned hot.
> Hows your back toothless? Is the light fading fast? Eat Shit Bigot.
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:3TAoi.421$hs1.12@newsfe13.lga...
>> You Really are Stumpier than a DUMP DYKE.
>>
>> GO FOR IT>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

WELL WELL WELL

Scripture beats the shit outta your chosen lifestyle.
I beat the shit outta you on evidence/testimony.

Yer sure havin a Baaaaad Day.

Here, make a comeback>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2d74a$0$22253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Fuck off Bigot. Terrorist. Traitor.
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:OBAoi.412$hs1.78@newsfe13.lga...
>> Ellen is a Woman with 4 kids (5 countin me)
>>
>> You're a SHIM.
>>
>> SHe hIM
>>
>> Oh Yeah
>> You're an ABOMINATION TOO.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46a2b6ce$0$6925$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> Did you ask Ellen?
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:u9qoi.1612$WP1.153@newsfe19.lga...
>>>> Dykes are very defensive.

Then "HE" also turned his back on GOD.
Matthew 10, 34-40.
(if you need me to spell it out for you I will)
(you most likely don't have a Bible either)
If you do, you didn't read that any more than the evidence/testimony)

At least you'll be together in HELL.

ps;
You forgot this one>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm

"Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:46a2f6b3$0$16207$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Of course he does. He loves me. Are you really this emotionally crippled
> Terrorist?
>
> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:zGBoi.442$hs1.440@newsfe13.lga...
>> GREAT way to Honor your Dad;
>>
>> You Force him to Reject his daughter OR spend Eternity in Hell.
>>
>> GREAT way to Honor your Dad;
>>
>> Did he accept you being a DYKE or NOT?
>>
>> and don't forget>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>
>>
>>
>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:46a2e454$0$14986$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> You are not fit to inhabit the same world as him. Your mere existence is
>>> an insult to him. Amoeba.
>>>
>>> "tomnln" <tomnln@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:keBoi.430$hs1.413@newsfe13.lga...
>>>> GREAT way to Honor your Dad;
>>>>
>>>> You Force him to Reject his daughter OR spend Eternity in Hell.
>>>>
>>>> GREAT way to Honor your Dad;
>>>>
>>>> Honor your Country by addressing evidence/testimony>>>
>>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sam Brown" <samjbrown68@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:46a2b973$0$12802$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>> My father fought in WWII for me to be free of the tyranny that you
>>>>> advocate Gil. You are a nothing. An anomaly. You are illustrating
>>>>> perfectly why your views should be dismissed as so much nonsense.
>>>>> Please continue. You make it easier for LNers to destroy what little
>>>>> credibility you ever had. Thank you.

MORE TO FOLLOW

Page Visited

Hit Counter

Times