SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/fbi_hosty.htm

CASE DISMISSED

      4   Altering Walker back yard photo. (3 times)  see walker page

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

45  Changing Walker bullet from “Steel-Jacketed” to Copper Jacket

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

6  Changing transcript of Oswald’s radio debate.  

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/altering_evidence.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

7   Lying when claiming Paper for gun bag matched TSBD paper.  

    CASE DISMISSED

8   Lying by stating Oswald had No connection to CIA. (see Spy Stuff))

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

9  Lying about Oswald going to Mexico City.

     SEE>>>    http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

10   Washing out Limo at Parkland Hospital thus Destroying evidence within minutes.  

     SEE>>>     http://whokilledjfk.net/you_asked_for_it.htm (items 31-3)

    CASE DISMISSED

11  Stealing body from Dallas jurisdiction under Gun Point.  

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/videopg.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

12  Stealing Limo from Dallas Jurisdiction under Gun Point..  

      SEE>>>   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01oaxb00dIE

     CASE DISMISSED

13  Destroying part 3 of P O Box Rental Application.  

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

14  Showed LHO 133A BEFORE (sat. noon-Sat evening) it was Found.  WCR App XI  

Showed Mike Paine back yard photo on Friday night.  it wasn't fopund until sat afternoon.

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm  (ITEMS 15-16)

     CASE DISMISSED

15  Dry Cleaning/Pressing JBC’s Clothing.  

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/cleaned_and_pressed.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

16 Switch Entrance/Exit wounds on JBC’s Wrist would.  

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/john_connally.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

17  JFK’s brain missing.  

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/missing_brain.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

18  Autopsy slides missing.  

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/hsca_volume_vii_____missing_slid.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

19  Alteration of “Z” film.  See Zapruder Film Page

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/zapruder%20film.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

20  Suborning Perjury from a witness. 

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/volume_v_sgt.htm

  CASE DISMISSED

21  Impersonating Oswald BEFORE Assassination.

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/ODIO.htm

      CASE DISMISSED

22   Intimidating Witnesses

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/SYLVIA.htm

23  Locking up records for 75 years     

      CASE DISMISSED

24  Lied about "Re-using" Mexico City audio tapes.

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm

      CASE DISMISSED

25  Destroyed Oswald's Postal Records Illegally.

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm

26.  Leibler's attempt to seduce Sylvia Odio incident

  CASE DISMISSED 

27.  refused legal representation for Oswald

CASE DISMISSED

28. FORCING A WIFE TO TESTIFY AGAINST HER HUSBAND

  CASE DISMISSED

29. why did the fbi lie about loren hall, gonzales & seymour being at sylvia odio's's "  case    CASE DISMISSED

look at this one about wcr supporters.

WHO was todd vaughan?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm

His claim to be well read on the subject not only maskes him a LIAR;

It makes him a "Criminal Liar" ! ! !

Which explains why he's posted under Aliases for the past year.






"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2005@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d317b8fb-fe26-44b5-a58d-60eb81864620@y19g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...

Same ole' same ole' - little Benny Nancy Pants.

I told you I'd answer you when the time was right, and on my terms,
not yours.



On Jul 18, 1:32 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> Time to repost this updated classic... First, a recap: I mentioned the FBI
> intimidation that occurred for so many of the eyewitnesses, and Toddy
> demanded
> some examples... so I was happy to oblige. Toddy then claimed that he
> could
> demolish all these examples, but his refutations were all in a file
> cabinet that
> was in storage.
>
> Of course, this was years ago, and still no refutation.
>
> Toddy *asked* for this post. Now, he's too gutless to respond to it.
>
> Toddy simply lied. First posted in 2005 - Toddy keeps telling everyone
> that
> he'll answer it when he 'gets around to it'. Of course, he never will.
>
> Although Toddy's been running from this post for quite some time, others
> have
> too, Eddie "Disgrace to the Corps" Dolan, and Chuckie Schuyler, to name
> just
> two. Other LNT'ers are too smart to get close to this post.
>
> All you ever need to shut up the LNT'ers is the evidence...
>
> ********************************
> Todd, just like other LNT'ers, refuse to see what is right before their
> eyes,
> and refuse to attempt to explain it when it becomes clear that they can't
> refute
> it.
>
> Todd didn't like it very much when I asserted:
>
> ********************************
> Since the FBI, as early as Saturday, was *telling* eyewitnesses that there
> were
> only three shots, coaching eyewitnesses to say what the FBI wanted to
> hear, it's
> amazing that we have as many accounts as we do that there were more.
>
> Mr. BELIN. How many shots did you hear, if you remember?
> Mr. EDWARDS. Well, I heard one more than was fired, I believe.
>
> And considering the number of people who've come forward to state that
> their
> affidavits and even *testimony* was changed, again, it's simply amazing
> that as
> much evidence as we have is still left in the record.
> ********************************
>
> But Todd won't actually *respond* to this... s




You're lying.

I did respond to this.

Why do you lie?


o let's add some more accounts to
> the fire. That way, Todd can ignore even *more* accounts:
>
> Richard Randolf Carr was a steelworker watching the motorcade from the
> Courthouse building. He testified:
>
> Q: Mr. Carr, did you talk to any FBI agents about this incident?
> A: Yes, I did.
> Q: Did they tell you to forget about it?
> MR. DYMOND: I object to that as hearsay.
> BY MR. GARRISON:
> Q: Were you threatened in any way --
> THE COURT: I sustain the objection. You cannot tell us the words used by
> someone
> who spoke to you because of hearsay; however, you can state that you had
> conversations with them and what did you do as a result of the
> conversation, I
> will permit that.
> BY MR. GARRISON:
> Q: As the result of the conversations with the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation,
> what did you do?
> A: I done as I was instructed, I shut my mouth.
> Q: Were you called to testify before the Warren Commission?
> A: No, sir.
>
> Carr told researchers Gary Shaw and Larry Harris: "The FBI came to my
> house-there were two of them-and they said they heard I witnessed the
> assassination and I said I did. They told me, 'If you didn't see Lee
> Harvey
> Oswald up in the School Book Depository with a rifle, you didn't witness
> it.'" I
> said, 'Well, the man I saw on television that they tell me is Lee Harvey
> Oswald
> was not in the window of the School Book Depository. That's not the man.'
> And
> (one of the agents) said I better keep my mouth shut. He did not ask me
> what I
> saw, he told me what I saw."
>
> But perhaps Todd doesn't find anything strange about reports such as this.
> After all, he's questioned eyewitnesses himself, and has the solution to
> the
> case. Yet explaining why eyewitnesses were threatened poses a problem ...
> one
> that he won't address.
>
> Ed Hoffman, the deaf mute who belatedly came forward and claimed to have
> seen
> two men with a rifle behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll, stated
> that
> he'd been warned by an FBI agent to keep quiet "or you might get killed."
>
> Then we have an attorney, Carroll Jarnagin, who reported being an
> eyewitness to
> a meeting between LHO and Ruby. According to an interview he gave Marrs,
> FBI
> agents, instead of investigating his potentially explosive revelations,
> tried
> accusing him of hallucinating. Jarnagin asserted that their conduct was
> "clearly abuse of a witness."
>
> Moving along to more august eyewitnesses, Senator Ralph Yarborough was
> shocked
> at the treatment he received from the Warren Commission staff (admittedly
> not
> the FBI, but related). He stated that they "walked in like they were a
> couple
> of deputy sheriffs and and I was a bank robber." They tried to pressure
> him to
> sign a statement that closed with "This is all I know about the
> assassination"
> and when he refused, they kept pressuring him, saying "you're holding this
> up,"
> and demanded he sign the statement. As Yarborough told Jim Marrs in 1986,
> "...I
> typed one up myself and put basically what I told you about how the cars
> all
> stopped. I put in there, 'I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings but for
> the
> protection of future presidents, they should be trained to take off when a
> shot
> is fired."
>
> If a United States Senator can be treated this way, imagine the lack or
> respect
> those "investigating" the assassination accorded the average citizen.
> David
> Powers, as I previously mentioned, was another who asserted that he'd been
> "pressured" to lie to the Warren Commission. Interestingly, he must have
> resisted quite well, since his deposition is certainly not one that the WC
> would
> have welcomed. Perhaps this is why he was never questioned... or more
> accurately - when he *WAS* questioned by Arlen Spector, why his testimony
> was
> never put in the record.
>
> (Now is perhaps a good time to mention that Todd had no response to make
> when I
> mentioned an example of the tremendous coverup going on, that: "As just
> one of
> the simple examples, care to defend the fact that the *closest* non-limo
> eyewitness to the murder, *a policeman* at that, was never questioned by
> anyone
> prior to the WCR being released?
>
> Nor can you argue that the WC was unaware of him - Anyone can view the
> Altgen's
> photo, and see him for themselves."
>
> Todd couldn't find the strength to respond to this... but perhaps this
> isn't
> covered in the "Lone Nutter's Handbook".
>
> Moving on... David Lifton reports Tomlinson's account, who history has
> recorded
> as the finder of CE 399, and who was called by the FBI that night - after
> midnight, and being told to keep his mouth shut about what he'd found.
> Tomlinson
> noted that "And they have a way to make a believer out of you".
>
> Mark Lane records this statement of Jean Hill: "For two years I have told
> the
> truth, but I have two children to support and I am a public school
> teacher. My
> principal said it would be best not to talk about the assassination, and I
> just
> can't go through it all again. I can't believe the Warren Report. I know
> it's
> all a lie, because I was there when it happened, but I can't talk about it
> anymore because I don't want the FBI here constantly and I want to
> continue to
> teach here. I hope you don't think I'm a coward but I cannot talk about
> the case
> anymore." But noooo... we must listen to Todd, he carefully coaches us
> that
> there has not been any FBI intimidation in this case.
>
> Another good example is also given by Mark Lane, the curious incident of
> Mrs.
> Tice - and considering that the Warren Commission flatly lied about her
> testimony, it's quite interesting indeed: "Mrs. Tice told the FBI that she
> had
> been visited by a man who claimed to be a reporter and who asked her to
> repeat
> the story about seeing Ruby at Parkland Hospital which she had previously
> told
> to Ruby's sister. After Mrs. Tice related the incident to him, the man
> advised
> her 'not to talk about this'. Shortly before her WC testimony, Mrs. Tice
> received the following anonymous phone call:
>
> Tice: Hello.
> Male Caller: Mrs. Tice?
> Tice: Hello.
> Male Caller: It would pay you to keep your mouth shut.
> (Rush to Judgment, pg 273)
>
> Another example given by Mark Lane is eyewitness Jean Hill:
>
> "Jean hill said that after she had originally spoken with me in February
> 1964
> 'the FBI was here for days. They practically lived here. They just didn't
> like
> what I told them I saw and heard when the President was assassinated.' She
> declined to permit a filmed interview, stating, 'For two years I have told
> the
> truth, but I have two children to support and I am a public school
> teacher. My
> principal said it would be best not to talk about the assassination, and I
> just
> can't got through it all again. I can't believe the Warren Report. I know
> it's
> all a lie, because I was there when it happened, but I can't talk about it
> anymore because I don't want the FBI here constantly and I want to
> continue to
> teach here. I hope you don't think I'm a coward, but I cannot talk about
> the
> case anymore." (Rush to Judgment, pg 285)
>
> In Tip O'Neill's book Man of The House, O'Neill describes a conversation
> with
> O'Donnell, who told him he was sure that two shots had come from the fence
> behind the grassy knoll. (As does Powers) O'Neill said to O'Donnell,
> "That's not
> what you told the Warren Commission." O'Donnell responded, "You're right,
> I told
> the FBI what I had heard, but they said it couldn't have happened that way
> and
> that I must have been imagining things. So I testified the way they wanted
> me
> to. I just didn't want to stir up any more pain and trouble for the
> family." But
> nooooo... we must listen to Todd... who will tell you that no such thing
> ever
> happened. (or, more accurately, will simply refuse to respond.)
>
> While I'm quite sure that this is an incomplete list, when we have a
> record of
> eyewitness intimidation such as this - what explanation does Todd offer?
>
> Why... none at all.
>
> Congratulations, Todd!
I BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF TOAD SO MANY TIMES WITH OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY THT HE NO LONGER POSTS HERE.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ben Holmes
> Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com
 

one of these days he'll run into someone who will kill the bastard..

Contact Information  tomnln@cox.net

Page Visited

Times